Does PatchLink alter Microsoft patches?

A number of people in our shop are concerned that patches installed via
PatchLink are somehow causing computers to slow down. This happens
particularly on a Dell Precision 690. If we install Windows XP SP2 with
all patches coming directly from Windows Update, the system does not
slow down. In this scenario, PatchLink is not installed on the system.

But, if we use PatchLink to patch the same kind of computer starting
with just Windows XP SP2, after patches, the system is noticeably
slower.

A long time ago, we noticed that on this system, if we used PatchLink's
version of XP SP2, we had problems getting another app to run. But, if
we downloaded and installed SP2 directly from Microsoft, we didn't have
the problem.

Many in our organization suspect PatchLink is somehow changing/altering
Microsoft patches. Is there any truth to that suspicion?

-- 

0
Michael
12/18/2007 9:47:27 PM
novell.zenworks.patch 2914 articles. 0 followers. Follow

6 Replies
247 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 11
Get it on Google Play
Get it on Apple App Store

Michael,

absolutely not. There is not "Patchlink version" of patches, all they 
are doing is putting a wrapper around the provided install mechanism.

-- 

Shaun Pond


0
Shaun
12/19/2007 1:05:15 PM
Shaun Pond wrote:

> Michael,
> 
> absolutely not. There is not "Patchlink version" of patches, all they 
> are doing is putting a wrapper around the provided install mechanism.

I didn't believe there was a "PatchLink version" of Microsoft patches.
However, I am faced with some some forces that like to place blame on
PatchLink whenever a system begins to act up, slow down, behave
sluggishly, etc. I am having a difficult time convincing one person in
particular that XP SP2 from PatchLink is no different than what can be
downloaded directly from Microsoft. When he installed SP2 directly from
Microsoft, a third-party adaptation of ArcGis ran without any problems,
but the service pack through PatchLink caused big problems.

Now, I have another person who believes PatchLink patches are causing a
general slow down of a Precision 690. He bases his theory on the fact
that machines with PatchLink are slower than those without.

I'm not sure how to defend PatchLink against these kinds of unwarranted
attacks.

-- 

0
Michael
12/19/2007 2:57:13 PM
Michael,

stupidity will always find a way. All that the system does is place it 
in the temp directory, then run it with the usual switches. Get them to 
define "slowdown", what's taking the CPU at the time for example? I 
canunderstand if, for example, DAGENT.EXE is taking CPU...

-- 

Shaun Pond


0
Shaun
12/19/2007 4:36:08 PM
There are a couple of things you can do that will slow down a system running
the patchlink agent - we had a few issues crop up in the past. 

One potential problem is setting a policy that sets the "Agent Scan Mode" to
fastscan (might've had a different name in an earlier version?). It's not
fast / quick due to being more cursory, it's faster and quicker because it
uses more of the client PC's resources to finish more quickly. 

Secondly, setting the registry key to exclude mapped network drives helped
us out a lot. That was really beating up some slower computers. 


0
Paul
12/21/2007 2:37:36 PM
Can you elaborate on the registry key to exclude mapped drives?  I've
read a LOT of things regarding Patchlink and DAU in particular.  This
is the first I've seen something about excluding network drives.

DAU and its impact on systems is a very hot topic in our environment.


-- 
JamesWoods
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JamesWoods's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=269
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=304509

0
JamesWoods
1/9/2008 6:46:01 PM
Nevermind....I found it: 'Answer' (http://tinyurl.com/3a7kvs)

Can't believe I hadn't come across this before.


-- 
JamesWoods
------------------------------------------------------------------------
JamesWoods's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=269
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=304509

0
JamesWoods
1/9/2008 7:26:02 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Patches, patches, patches...
To forestall potential incidents of Warnock's Dillemma... I'm about to apply a whole heap 'o patches to Parrot. (With appropriate [APPLIED] responses, I hope) If, at the end of the day, I have *not* applied or commented on a patch you've sent, it means I've Officially Missed It, so give another try. Sorry 'bout this. Too much mail in the mailbox, and going back in time is tricky, as it can miss subsequent discussions on patches 'n stuff. -- Dan --------------------------------------"it's like th...

Microsoft patching its patches
While we're on the topic of zombies, security and patches..... George. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Exchange security patch needs patching" The patch needs a patch. The security update Microsoft rolled out last week to caulk a hole in Exchange 2000 server actually needs a patch itself. MS is also broadening its original Exchange 2000 security bulletin to include Exchange 5.5 Server deployments for the first time. Microsoft says if you've deployed Outlook Web Access, you need to patch ASAP. SOURCE: ENT Magazine http...

Patches, patches, patches... #2
OK, this is advance warning that I'm about to be reposting a bunch of patches of mine which appear to have succumbed to Warnock's Dilemma. The first three should be uncontroversial: there's a documentation fix-up for core.ops, and new tests for strings and stacks. The last one is rather larger, and consists of a greatly expanded set of tests for PerlString's, plus a bunch of bug-fixes. I'd be grateful if Jeff or Dan could take a look at this, as I have the feeling that a lot of the scalar PMCs are going to need similar fixes. Simon ...

Microsoft will patch the patch
RE: MS06-015 http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2006/04/microsoft-will-patch-patch.html -- js In grc.linkfarm john s. smith wrote: > RE: MS06-015 > > http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2006/04/microsoft-will-patch-patc > h.html > Glad I waited and read the results seen w Version 1.0! Thanks. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin/MS06-015.mspx ======================================= V1.0 (April 11, 2006): Bulletin published. V1.1 (April 15, 2006): Bulletin revised: �Caveats� section updated due to new issues discovered with the securi...

[PATCH] Patch to patch for callbacks in core
I should have tested this better before submitting it. This patch is to Perl 11722 after applying my previous patch. Now callbacks will actually work. :-) - D <dmlloyd@tds.net> --- mg.c-old Tue Aug 21 13:26:52 2001 +++ perl-devel/mg.c Tue Aug 21 15:09:16 2001 @@ -1068,7 +1068,18 @@ void Perl_despatch_signals(pTHX) { - PL_event_pending = 0; + if (PL_callback_head != NULL) { + CALLBACK *cur, *next; + + for (cur = PL_callback_head; cur != NULL; cur = next) { + next = cur->next; + (*cur->callback)(cur->data); + ...

Where are the ZENworks Patch Management server patches at?
According to this URL: http://www.novell.com/support/dynamickc.do?externalId=3540830&sliceId=SAL_Public&command=show&forward=nonthreadedKC&kcId=3540830 ZENworks Patch Management Patch 5 is out....I must be way behind because I still have the base product installed. Where are these patches at? I cannot seem to find any of them on Novell's website. Applying these patches could very well fix my issue with my server not being able to contact novell.patchlinksecure.net as well as the issue we are having regarding the Discovery Agent using vast amounts of client CPU...

Compression Custom Patch Zenworks Patch Management
Hello, Please I am testing Custom Patch ZPM 6.4, My problem is I don't know how many compress file. Please someone knows this, Please tell me. Regardess Ricardo Seris Guerra -- Ricardo_Seris ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ricardo, are you asking how to compress your files? In a custom package you would have to do this yourself, perhaps use winzip to compress, then use a script to decompress at the workstation. To make this automatic, you would need to buy the PDK (Patch Development Kit) -- Shaun Pond ...

[PATCH] todo patch
--- perltodo.pod.old Wed May 16 17:51:45 2001 +++ perltodo.pod Mon May 28 16:56:29 2001 @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ Artur Bergman's C<iThreads> module is a start on this, but needs to be more mature. +=head2 make perl_clone optionally clone ops + +So at pseduforking, mod_perl , iThreads and nvi will work properly (not as efficient) until regex engine is fixed + =head2 Work out exit/die semantics for threads =head2 Typed lexicals for compiler On Mon 28 May 2001 17:03, Artur Bergman <artur@contiller.se> wrote: > --- perltodo.pod.old Wed May 16 17:5...

[PATCH] perlhack on what to patch
--- pod/perlhack.pod.orig 2006-07-12 22:52:14.000000000 +0300 +++ pod/perlhack.pod 2006-07-12 23:05:40.000000000 +0300 @@ -598,14 +598,22 @@ =head2 Submitting patches but context diffs are accepted. Do not send RCS-style diffs or diffs without context lines. More information is given in the I<Porting/patching.pod> file in the Perl source distribution. Please -patch against the latest B<development> version (e.g., if you're -fixing a bug in the 5.005 track, patch against the latest 5.005_5x -version). Only patches that survive the heat of the development ...

[PATCH] patching for sunos
Hi coders, greetings from the stone age: This is perl, v5.9.4 built for sun4-sunos-stdio SunOS Release 4.1.3 (GENERIC) #3: Mon Jul 27 16:44:16 PDT 1992 $ uname -a SunOS xxx 4.1.3 3 sun4m If anyone is interested in patches for SunOS yet, I have some. Some are harmless, some may not be optimal. Help/hints/tips are always nice and appreciated. 1. SunOS realloc() does not like NULL pointers as parameters. (buf?realloc((buf), (size)):malloc((size))) 2. There is no strtoul(), alas. Some older code correctly uses the Strtoul() macro (capital S). Newer additions don't...

[PATCH] more pod patches
Yet more pod linting, this time on .pm files. I've touched things without fear or favour mostly - I think probably a few of these changes affect things that are also maintained outside the core. diff -urN perl-current.orig/configpm perl-current/configpm --- perl-current.orig/configpm Thu Mar 15 20:33:42 2001 +++ perl-current/configpm Thu Mar 15 21:10:59 2001 @@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ print CONFIG <<EOF; =head2 $c -=over +=over 4 EOF $text = 1; diff -urN perl-current.orig/ext/B/B/Bytecode.pm perl-current/ext/B/B/Bytecode.pm --- perl-current.orig/ext/B/B/B...

[PATCH] installperl patch
------=_Part_72778_11907270.1186149310146 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline The attached patch modifies installperl as follows: 1. Don't install lib/CGI/eg/*. (These files aren't installed by the CPAN version of CGI either.) 2. Don't install lib/ExtUtils/NOTES, and lib/ExtUtils/PATCHING. (These files aren't installed by the CPAN version of ExtUtils::MakeMaker either.) ------=_Part_72778_11907270.1186149310146 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=installperl.patch Content-Transf...

[PATCH] More Build patches
Two patches inline... A small change to Makefile.in so that 'make test' doesn't try to run without an interpreter or missing assembler libraries. Index: Makefile.in =================================================================== RCS file: /home/perlcvs/parrot/Makefile.in,v retrieving revision 1.24 diff -u -r1.24 Makefile.in --- Makefile.in 2001/10/14 10:58:19 1.24 +++ Makefile.in 2001/10/15 14:42:12 @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ cd t; make clean cd docs; make clean -test: .test_dummy +test: $(TEST_PROG) assemble.pl .test_dummy .test_dummy: ...

PATCH: clarify where to patch against
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Talking about Perl 5 git repo tonight, some questions came up about where development really happens. This patch is a bit of clarification about where/why patches go to blead/maint. -- rjbs --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-very-minor-tweaks-to-description-of-maint-blead.patch" From 1b7ad6bc0c93abd2d9fad847e8449824e529ba24 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ricardo SIGNES <rjbs@cpan.org> Date:...

Web resources about - Does PatchLink alter Microsoft patches? - novell.zenworks.patch

Lumension and FrontRange announce rebirth as Heat Software
US security firms Lumension and FrontRange have sprung a surprise by announcing a merger that will see the combined 350-employee firm rebrand ...

Seventeen Arizona firms make Inc. 500
... made the 2006 Inc. 500 list of fastest-growing private companies released Wednesday. Ranking the highest at No. 14 was Scottsdale-based PatchLink, ...

When to convert from Windows XP to Vista, part 2
Every new version of Windows includes hundreds of bugs. At what point do you consider Vista sufficiently debugged that you can depend on it? ...

Microsoft plugs 21 security holes
All but two of the 21 Windows, Office and Exchange flaws could let an intruder run code on a compromised computer. A CNET article by Dawn Kawamoto, ...

Application whitelisting review: Lumension Application Control
Lumension Application Control is a competitive product with a number of standout features and one significant omission

PatchLink born again as Lumension Security
Patch management company PatchLink is no more, but its demise is not bad news. The company has changed its name to Lumension Security.

Get Your IT Certification Easily. ExamsVIP Expert Team Is Ready to Help You with All Your IT Certification ...
Prepare for your IT certification exam easily with ExamsVIP guaranteed certification practice questions and answers. We have the most professional ...

Improve IT Security With Vulnerability Management - 480703
Vulnerability Assessment Vulnerability assessment (VA) provides baseline and discovery functions in support of vulnerability management. VA ...

IT vendor listing information on government information security
Expansive IT vendor listing, featuring contact information, security solutions, company description and related whitepapers on government information ...

GRC - SQL Sapphire / SQL-Hell / Slammer
The Anatomy of File Download Spyware

Resources last updated: 12/14/2015 2:54:21 AM