Edir 18.104.22.168\ 22.214.171.124\126.96.36.199
Ok Iam confused with the roll back issue. What is the Edir that is working
Iam hearing Novell rolled back 8.3.6 but I can only see that 188.8.131.52 is
stable but Iam not hearing if 184.108.40.206 is ok. Iam on 220.127.116.11 and Iam having
issue with keeping edir healthy. So is this my issue and or how do you roll
back if I need to. Also I see some said " dsrapir full attened is not the
preferred way of getting ds healthy so what is this about I have not heard
of this before.
Thanks to anyone who can clear this up while I wait for ssupport to get
back to me on the phone.
8735 came with N...eDir 8.7.3 and eDir 18.104.22.168
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
I have about 30 NW6 and 10 NW6.5 server. I want to upgrade to eDir 22.214.171.124
across the board.
I was also thinking of upgrading NICI 2.6.5 and adding the SECUPD2a and
This requires me to reboot the server 5 times fro the NW6 servers and 4
times for the NW65 servers.
Is there a consolidated support pack that I can build to upgrade all or
some of these together.
Just cycling the server 5 times will take about an hour!
--=_alternat...eDir 126.96.36.199 to eDir 8.7.3
I have NW5.1+SP7 servers and NW6+SP3 servers. All severs run edir
188.8.131.52 (2 run
Must I upgrade to eDir 8.7.3 ?
What are the changes ?
No, you don't HAVE to upgrade the NW5.1 servers.
8.7.3 comes with the NW6.5sp1a CDs (I only install with the overlay CD).
Novell Support Forums Sysop
...upgrade edir 8.7.3 to 8.8.2 or 8.8.3?
Our tree: Netware 6.5SP7 and OES2/Linux, edir 184.108.40.206b ftf1 and edir
I started to install new servers with edir 8.8 some month ago, some of the
edir 8.7.3 servers will be switched of before long. Now I want to upgrade
the remaining 8.7.3 servers to 8.8. It seemed clear to me that I wouldn't
install 8.8.2 if 8.8.3 is out. But after reading the postings here, I am
Isn't it dangerous to stay at 8.8.2? Some of the fixed problems are
overflows - these might be security relevant?
I saw two problems with 8.8.3 here: the ldap probl...[IDM 3] eDir 220.127.116.11 or 8.8
I'm going to install a IDM 3 on SLSE 9 in a production environment to
synchronize some systems. What is the best solution for the identity vault
version , eDir 18.104.22.168 or eDir 8.8 ?
This meta directory will be used only to consolidate some information that
will be accessed with a web interface and will do some provisioning. Are
there some known bugs with eDir8.8 ?
If you are ever going to want to go to 8.8 and above I would start with
it. It probably isn't quite as stable as 22.214.171.124, but upgrading to 8.8
once IDM is installed is problematic and requires ...eDir 126.96.36.199 Ugrade to eDir 8.8.2
Currently we have eDir 8.8.2 in our tree and I have several servers NDS
6.5.5 / eDir 188.8.131.52 and would like to upgrade all to NDS 6.5.7 / eDir
8.8.2. Is there a simple way to do this, it's not so simple from the
patch readme's and I'm unable to find a TID saying I can go directly to
8.8.2. Thanks for your help.
> Currently we have eDir 8.8.2 in our tree and I have several servers
> NDS 6.5.5 / eDir 184.108.40.206 and would like to upgrade all to NDS 6.5.7...Edirectory 8.8 compatible with 220.127.116.11
We are using Identity Manager and found out that Edirectory 8.8 and
Identity Manager 2.0.1 are not compatible. My question is can we back rev
to 18.104.22.168 on our one server running IDM and have 22.214.171.124 work well with
Edirectory 8.8 ? Thanks.
No, I don't think so you can backrev DS to 8.7.3.
However, if you don't use any of the new features of 8.8 (Encrypted sync,
data, multiple instance), you should be fine.
> We are using Identity Manager and found out that Edirectory 8.8 and
> Identity Manager 2.0.1 are ...EDIR 126.96.36.199 & EDIR 8.7.3
I am about to update to EDIR 188.8.131.52, i was wondering should i be
looking to update to EDIR 8.7.3 or newer? or is EDIR 8.7.3 NW6 specific
I will not be updating to NW6.5 till next year.
8.7.3 is supported on NetWare 5.1 with the current support packs.
Just be aware that the webapps that come with 8.7.x won't run on NW 5.1
because of the apache/tomcat requirements.
Jim Henderson, Novell Support Forums Volunteer SysOp
Homepage at http://hendersj.dyndns.org
eDirectory Training info at http://ediratt.dyndns.org
So...184.108.40.206 vs 220.127.116.11
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Before I get crazy and try to do any updates is 18.104.22.168 any better than =
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="____MNYJSHUJRUWPZYUTGMXP____"
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
<META content...Anyone running NIM on 8.7.3 in a mixed 8.7.3/8.8 environment
We are running NIM 3.5 on a NetWare 6.5 replica server with eDir
22.214.171.124. We will be introducing eDir 8.8 (not on THIS server!).
Question asked was will the 8.8 schema extension adversely affect our
NIM? So I am asking, has anyone running NIM 3.5 on 8.7.3 done the 8.8
schema extension and, if so, did anything bad happen--to NIM?
FYI, down the road, we'll be installing the current version of NIM on a
8.8 replica server.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
It shouldn...Insufficient Buffer 649
In Dstrace, I am repeatedly am seeing this error message:
11:08:32 599A2BB0 Agent: DSAGetServerNetAddress failed, insufficient buffer
I started looking closer at DS when co-workers complained about changes not
Anyone know what may be going on? Suggestions?
This message should be solved by DS itself. It is just an informational
message, not an error message. Do you have any problems?
> In Dstrace, I am repeatedly am seeing this error message:
> 11:08:32 599A2BB0 Agent:...Edir 126.96.36.199a
Does anybody know what is different between Edir 188.8.131.52a and
184.108.40.206? At least I hope, that the TID 7000100 issue has been resolved
- but it is nowhere mentioned, that this is the case.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
10a was released specifically to resolve those issues.
W_ Prindl wrote:
| Does anybody know what is different between Edir 220.127.116.11a and
| 18.104.22.168? At least I hope, that the TID 7000100 issue has been resolved
| - but it is nowhere mentioned, that this is the case.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Gnu...eDir 22.214.171.124 to 126.96.36.199
Can the 188.8.131.52 patch be installed on only one server of a multi-server
We currently have 6 5.1SP6 and 3 6.5SP2 servers all running 184.108.40.206 but
only one of the 6.5 servers is needing the patch at this time.
It can, but if your goal is to fix the dsloader memory leak in 6.5 sp2,
every 6.5 server requires the fix.
Andrew C Taubman
Novell Support Forums Volunteer SysOp
(Sorry, support is not provided via e-mail)
Opinions expressed above are not
necessarily those of Novell Inc.
Andrew C Taubman wrote:
> It can, but...Edirectory update from 8.7.3 to 220.127.116.11
I'm trying to update my Edirectory Linux machines from 8.7.3 to the next
When I run the install script, I get a lot of these messages :
The "./Linux/NOVLsubag-18.104.22.168-1.i386.rpm" package included in this patch
version of "." when it is expected to be "22.214.171.124".
To continue the installation past any errors use the --force switch.
And then the patch install fails.
This also happens when I attempt the same thing on another RedHat Linux
box running 126.96.36.199 > to 188.8.131.52
Well, the so...