Bordermanager vpn vs Cisco router vpn etcI have a small client with a Novell 5.x server with about 35 clients,
many
of which are needing some sort of vpn access. Trying to figure out if
it is
easier to setup border manager for vpn access on the server or simply
get a
router that will provide vpn access. Which would be easier or more
cost
effective in this scenario over a dsl connection. Any suggestions or
comments are appreciated.
Thanks
Paul
I guess it depends a lot on cost. Do you already have BMgr? (A copy
that includes client-site VPN?) If so, just install that and
configure
it.
As for using ...
Help With Setting a VPN With a Linksys VPN Capable RouterI have been trying to use our Linksys BEFSX41's VPN capabilities. VPN's are
something about which I know little and Linksys's information on the subject
is at best sparse. I was hoping that someone in our group here could point
me in the direction of some "how-to's" on the subject. Everything that I
have found to date seems like it starts on chapter 3, what I need is
chapters 1 and 2.
The only way of testing my setup is to attempt to contact the cable route
via an internet connection from a dialup account on my notebook.
I have download and tested Micr...
VPN using PTPP with a "VPN pass-through router"?Hi,
This is what i want to do:
Client (Internet)-------------> Router (192.168.0.1)--------------->Me
(192.168.0.3)
My ADSL router is a Dlink DSL-504 and it says it offers VPN pass through.
Specifically, there are two sections in the configuration that i can see:
(1) IP Masquerade Pass Through; (2) NAT ALGs. Both have boxes labelled PPTP
and i have both checked.
As I understand it PTPP requires TCP/IP on Port 1723 and GRE/IP on Port 47.
I have mapped TCP port 1723 on my router through to Me (192.168.0.3).
When my mate (Client) connects I get a TCP connection on Por...
Problems with VPN with Bordermanager over a Linux Router (NAT)Hi,
I have a little problem:
My Windows-Box is behind a Linux-Box (Mandrake 9.1 and iptables). The
linux-box is the gateway for all windows-boxes.
On the windows-box (IP: 192.168.1.12) I have installed BorderManager
3.7 R2.
When I try to connect to a VPN-Server (outside of my LAN - over the
Internet) I can connect, but no crypted packets were received.
When I use a dial-up connection to the internet direct on the
windows-box
(AVM-Fritz-card) the vpn-connect works fine.
So, can anyone help me which port I have to forward to my windows-box
?? And
how I can do this (with ip...
BorderManager VPN Stops working after ISP has router probsBM 3.6 VPN. We have two server to server VPN connections. Both have
been
trouble free for over a year. Recently, the ISP for one of the remote
offices had a router melt down. The router was repaired/replaced
several
hours later. Since then(3 days ago), we have not been able to
re-establish
the VPN. If I "reset" the VPN tunnel, the server on the other side
"hears"
it and states that the VPN has become disconnected and re-connected.
However, no traffic seems to be able to get through the tunnel.
I assume the ISP made some change to their router to cause...
VPN Client 3.8 behind Netgear Router VPN Server C2S behind Linux IPTABLESI configured my vpn client behind a Netgear router in NAT modus.
MY BM 3.8 C2S is running behind Linux IPTABLES in static NAT Modus.
If configured my bm policies after the book from john craig
(NMAS / PASSWORD/ NDS)
If I connect from my VPN Client I get NMAS error "error authentication
FFFF996" but nothing in nmasmon (ver 1.21)
If I connect the client can read the name of Tree but then occured the
error.
The same error I get if I configure my vpn client in the same network
like linux public interface and attach from there my BM about linux
nat interface.
Does any...
VPN ConfusionI've been following the SN podcasts and just finished listening to #19.
After reviewing the posts in this group, I must admit to being confused by
what to use. Hamachi, iPIG, OpenVPN, Remote Desktop, Tight-VNC, Real-VNC,
Ultra-VNC, etc. I realize that these are different products for different
purposes. My problem is that I'm trying to determine the right solution for
my company.
I have a Peer-to-Peer network (no servers) in the office with 12 users/PCs.
All of these PCs are Win XP of different flavors (Home, Pro, Media Center).
The XP Pro and XP Media Center PCs ha...
VPNWhere might I find/configure a log of who connects to our VPN, whether
or not they login to Netware once connected, etc. The login to Netware
portion is relatively unimportant, but I would like to track basic
information like remote IP, username, connect time, disconnect time,
etc.
Netware 6.5, BorderManager 3.8/SP4/IR3. Client is 3.8.11 for all remote
users. We currently have two working VPNs - different servers,
different OU's.
TIA.
-S-
I don't know if this has changed in later versions of BM but this is how I
monitor activity in BM 3.7.
Open NWADM...
VPN RouterGood day group, With all the VPN talk going around I would like to
know more about the VPN routers, namely the Linksys. How do these
routers compare to OpenVPN? What are the pros and cons of this? The cost
of each is not a consideration, that is relative. What can the routers
do or not do that the software can or can't do? I would like to hear the
experiences of this group. Some disscussion of both would be great.
David
David wrote:
> Good day group, With all the VPN talk going around I would like to
> know more about the VPN routers, namely the Linksys.
I...
legacy vpn + new vpnHi,
I am running a bordermanager nw6 3.7 server configured as a master vpn
server. The slave is also a nw6 3.7 server and is in another country.
Now we need to put another slave to this vpn, however w'd like to do that
with bordermanager 3.8.
The question is if we update this server from 3.7 to 3.8, will the legacy
vpn run without a problem, while 3.7 on the other side is running. (I think
this will be no problem, correct me if I am wrong)
On the other hand I want to configure a new master vpn on the same server by
use of imanager. The other slave will be the new company. I...
REPOSTBM 3.6 VPN. We have two server to server VPN connections. Both have
been
trouble free for over a year. Recently, the ISP for one of the remote
offices had a router melt down. The router was repaired/replaced
several
hours later. Since then(3 days ago), we have not been able to
re-establish
the VPN. If I "reset" the VPN tunnel, the server on the other side
"hears"
it and states that the VPN has become disconnected and re-connected.
However, no traffic seems to be able to get through the tunnel.
I assume the ISP made some change to their router to cause...
BorderManager VPNHi,
I have a customer who is looking for a VPN solution (No more details
yet...)
Anyhow they have Border Manager 3.8 for proxy. However another site of
theirs uses ISA.
I know very little about either products. and would like to know
peoples views?
is BM a good product for VPN, are their better 3rd Party products?
Thanks
Hi,
I use BM vpns all over the place & rate them highly. The 3.8 release
was a major step forward as we now use the ipsec standard for site to
site transport & can now talk to any other industry standard ipsec vpn
endpoint.
Client to...
VPN routerInterested in setting up a VPN router to access files at home but also
to tunnel through when browsing the internet on a smartphone or laptop
on a public wifi/ wired network. Any suggestions. I know there are alot
of options. Something easy to set up and manage, with maximum security.
I know true security is not always easy to manage.
David
http://www.dd-wrt.com/wiki/index.php/VPN_(the_easy_way)_v24%2B
...
vpn to vpn connection questionHello: I've been asked to look into a vpn to vpn connection with a third
party vpn server connection to our bm38sp2 vpn. Last week I had asked if
this was possible and the answer was yes (but).
Currently I have our vpn up and running to allow me secure access from home
for remote management. The vpn is setup as the master vpn server.
Now, if I try to connect to a third party vpn, will our server be a client
in this case (I assume so)? If so, how does this impact our current setup
as a master server?
Thanks in advance, Chris.
PS. Others have suggested (strongly) to si...