VPN 3.8 Client behind Netgear Router and BM 3.8 behind Linux IPTABLES
I ve configured my BM 3.8 Client behind my Netgear DSL Router (NAT).
I ve configured my BM 3.8 SP1 Server behind Linux (IPTABLES NAT) not a
filter problem.
In this configuration I can do all at BM 3.8 server.
I ve configured my BM entry policies from Craigs Johnsons book
Authentication with NMAS (NDS).
Now if I connect to BM server I got following NMAS error (error
authentication gateway FFFFF996.
The same error if I configure my vpm client in same network like
my natted linux interface.
I m not sure where I should look at first. I ve heard BM is running
a linux na...
VPN Client 3.8 behind Netgear Router VPN Server C2S behind Linux IPTABLESI configured my vpn client behind a Netgear router in NAT modus.
MY BM 3.8 C2S is running behind Linux IPTABLES in static NAT Modus.
If configured my bm policies after the book from john craig
(NMAS / PASSWORD/ NDS)
If I connect from my VPN Client I get NMAS error "error authentication
FFFF996" but nothing in nmasmon (ver 1.21)
If I connect the client can read the name of Tree but then occured the
error.
The same error I get if I configure my vpn client in the same network
like linux public interface and attach from there my BM about linux
nat interface.
Does any...
BM 3.8 VPN Server behind NAT routerI've received different impressions from some of the information that I've
read about BM 3.8 and NAT. Then I see a post from Cat saying "yes,
provided that the CIsco is not doing NAt (for BM3.6). With BM3.8 should
work in any case."
So, to ask the question clearly of those most likely to know: Can a BM
3.8 server be positioned behind a NAT router, with a single interface, and
work correctly with a client PC which is also behind a NAT router
(assuming that the private network ranges are different, of course)?
I'm considering an upgrade to SBS6.5, which has BM...
BM 3.8 VPN Client Behind Firewall-1Hi,,
Got a customer running a BM 3.8 server,
he needs to place out a PC at another site where they run Firewall-1,
They have been trying to use the BM 3.8 VPN client from inside that
network ( behind the firewall-1) to connect to the BM 3.8 server.
No Luck..
Also,
by phone,, I've been trying to help out by getting him to test a
couple of our BM servers, 1 -BM3.7 and 1 - BM 3.8.
No luck there either,
Using the realtime monitor and aquire the detailed log from the BM 3.8
on our network does NOT reveal anything, no kind off traffic at all
from him...
Accordin...
BM 3.5 to BM 3.8 w/VPNBordermanager 3.5 server on Netware 5.1 providing firewall and proxy
services for users on internal network. This box is also acting as the
Master VPN server with multiple site-to-site VPN links to BM 3.5 slave
servers.
Primary Goal
Replace the existing Bordermanager 3.5 master VPN server hardware with a
new server running Bordermanager 3.8 on Netware 6.0. It is possible to
have both servers online during migration. Must minimize disruption to
firewall, proxy & VPN services.
Secondary Goal:
No changes (or minimial changes only) to the slave servers running BM
3.5. (T...
C2S VPN , BM 3.8 serverHello,
I had posted a question regarding this issue before, but nothing ever really came of it until now, because we have a customer who is needing this issue fixed. We have 1 server that runs NWSB 6.5 sp2. It has all the company files, information ,etc, basically everyone logs into this server. We want to run a C2S VPN server on it. I have the general setup, and install done. However when I log in to the VPN server using C2S, I can't get to any of the volumes or for that matter the BM server itself.
In my testing lab this wasn't an issue because I had two or more servers ...
BM 3.8 VPN C2S with ActivCardHello
After upgrading BM3.6 with VPN C2S and ActivCard One to 3.8 I can authenticate VPN without entering token password using backward compability. In the VPN-client 3.8.7 readme -file it states: The ActiveCard token
authentication method will work if the ActiveCard
token method is configured for the user in
eDirectory.
The only method i can find is the Universal smart card. Is there a way to make my ActivCard One tokens to work with BM 3.8 VPN? If not, whitch tokens work with 3.8 NMAS/VPN client and BM 3.8?
Thank you in advance.
Thomas Brod�n
...
Vpn routers as slave with BM 3.8HI
I need to setup a site to site with BM 3.8. I am tempted to install
another BM 3.8 server. Or I thought I could try a VPN router like
linksys or Netgear.
The goal is go a site to site and then also be able to do a client to be
able to remote control PC.
OR should I try that new Linux system Novell has? Can that do Site to
Site with BM?
Thanks
Will
In article <k57Ne.1314$_g4.306@prv-forum2.provo.novell.com>, Will k
wrote:
> Or I thought I could try a VPN router like
> linksys or Netgear.
>
A Linksys BEFSX41 works fine as a 3.8 slave server in a S2...
BM 3.8 sp2 VPN c2sWe have installed a NW 6 SP4 server, with BM 3.8 SP2, and are trying to get VPN C2S working. We do have Craig Johnson's book as a guide, but we are still experiencing the following problems.
1.) We are not able to login into the Netware server, we receive the following
Netware login attempt failed, user is not logged in to Netware(this happens after about two minutes of trying)
We thought that we had this fixed when we added a host entry into the PC's hosts file. This worked when the PC was connected to the internal side of the network(at least on our one test PC), however still...
Can I import VPN setting from BM 3.7 into BM 3.8Hi all,
we have a Netware 6.5 server with Bordermanager 3.7. (after migration from
NW 5.1) This worked fine for a year, but now the server abends several
times a day. Bordermanager is only used for Proxy and VPN.
I want to replace the server with a new installed NW6.5 with BM 3.8.
Can I quickly and easy import my current VPN settings from BM 3.7?
Greetz,
Erwin
hi Erwin,
You can't really "import" the VPN from a server to another one, unless
you image it (but at the end you would have an identical server, i.e. 3.7).
The safest way is to reconfigure the VPN in t...
BM 3.8 C2S VPN Server is not respondingHello,
I have some problems with VPN Client-to-site.
I installed BorderManager 3.8 with SP1a on a NW 6.5 server
and configure C2S in backward comp. mode (VPNCFG and rules
with iManager).
Client can connect and authenticate with eDirectory user/
password to BM server and I can ping the internal LAN
(172.16.x.x), BUT after 10 to 15 seconds a windows pops up
and says "Server is not responding. Connection will be
disconnected." and the client disconnects !
Problems occurs with different Client OS (W2K, XP) and
different VPN Clients (3.7 and 3.8.x).
Thank for help.
...
Microsoft VPN client Behind a BM 3.8We've got a client that has some users that needs to run some apps
through a MS vpn connection,
They have a Firewall 1 and a BM server,
they have issues with the Firewall 1 and almost no support for it,
so,, they like us to help them get the users going out through the BM
3.8 instead..
Any ideas if it'll work..??,, and if so,, which exceptions should be
needed on the BM..??
I've got craigs books,, but,, havent found the relavant info there yet
THanks,
MS VPN uses GRE encryption protocol. GRE does not work through
Novell's NAT.
Craig Johnson
N...
BM 3.8 VPN behind Sonicwall TZ170Has anyone had success setting up a BM 3.8 C2S VPN behind a Sonicwall TZ170 or any sonicwall for that matter. Some of my customers are looking for a two layered firewall solution and several purchased these before I had a chance to check functionality. Thanks in advance.
Reposted in VPN forum
> Has anyone had success setting up a BM 3.8 C2S VPN behind a Sonicwall
TZ170 or any sonicwall for that matter. Some of my customers are looking
for a two layered firewall solution and several purchased these before I
had a chance to check functionality. Thanks in advance.
...
VPN 3.6 slave to VPN 3.8 masterI have more or less gone through what I could to set this up.
I exported the BM 3.8 master encryption key (minfo.vpn) and imported that to
the BM 3.6 slave without any issue. I then created the slave (sinfo.vpn)
file.
I had setup the vpn tunnel ip's as 192.168.10.1 and when these were both
masters, clients could access either one perfectly. We know the VPN's
work.
I changed 1 to a slave, but I halted what I was doing as I noted that the
master and slave networks both are using 192.168.0.x for the private IP's.
Questions:
1. Can a 3.6 slave talk to a 3.8 master?...