Hi! The "Subscribe to Remote Calendar" should have and option that says "Read-only Calendar" to prevent users from (accidentally?) adding events to remote calendars that they don't have any PUT-priviliges to. The current implementation lets the user do that, and then at the next refresh, the events are deleted without any error-messages or warnings. This behaviour could have nasty consequences if the user really meant to put the event in a local calendar, but accidentally put it in the wrong calendar. But, as I keep saying, your program is super, and please take my constant nagging for what it is meant to be: Constructive feedback to make it even more useful than it already is! Keep up the good work, guys! /Joel Hedlund
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Joel Hedlund wrote: > Hi! > > The "Subscribe to Remote Calendar" should have and option that says > "Read-only Calendar" to prevent users from (accidentally?) adding events > to remote calendars that they don't have any PUT-priviliges to. The > current implementation lets the user do that, and then at the next > refresh, the events are deleted without any error-messages or warnings. > This behaviour could have nasty consequences if the user really meant to > put the event in a local calendar, but accidentally put it in the wrong > calendar. I myself don't use webdav for the calendar but I think this is an essential feature and you should file it in bugzilla (if it's not there already). -- /Martin Bagge mail: martin@bagge.nu PGP: http://martin.bagge.nu/pgp.asc web: http://martin.bagge.nu
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Martin Bagge / brother wrote: > Joel Hedlund wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>The "Subscribe to Remote Calendar" should have and option that says >>"Read-only Calendar" to prevent users from (accidentally?) adding events >>to remote calendars that they don't have any PUT-priviliges to. The >>current implementation lets the user do that, and then at the next >>refresh, the events are deleted without any error-messages or warnings. >>This behaviour could have nasty consequences if the user really meant to >>put the event in a local calendar, but accidentally put it in the wrong >>calendar. > > > > I myself don't use webdav for the calendar but I think this is an > essential feature and you should file it in bugzilla (if it's not there > already). > I just did, now that I've found out how to :-) I also won't spam this newsgroup with this kind of messages from now on. Promise!
![]() |
0 |
![]() |
Joel Hedlund wrote: > > > I just did, now that I've found out how to :-) > I also won't spam this newsgroup with this kind of messages from now on. > Promise! Joel, Don't worry too much about descussions on this newsgroup about new features, if it is a bug no doubt bugzilla is great. If it is a new feature, or even close to it, sometimes this is good for descussion anyway. Though 99% of new feature requests [should] end up on bugzilla anyway. ~Justin Wood
![]() |
0 |
![]() |