From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...SeaMonkey 2.2 #2
I have just re-installed 2.0.14 and it works a treat.
Don't mess with wot ain't broke.
...SeaMonkey 1.1.18 vs SeaMonkey 2.1 (if/when 2.1 is released)
I will clearly state that I am not a computer whiz...thus, I have a
number of concerns regarding SeaMonkey 2.0 installation on my system.
I have been reading the many SeaMonkey 2.0 messages on this newsgroup
with some concern about my ability to fix the problems that could occur
with the installation of 2.0. It seems that the move from 1.1.18 to 2.0
is not happening without a number of glitches along the way. Thus, in
light of what I have read, I am wondering if it would wise for me to
wait for a future release of SeaMonkey before upgrading my system...I
suppose I am hoping tha...Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty!
Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabled by nightly
build and I don't speak english fluently.
St=E9phane Gr=E9goire schrieb:
> I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launc=
> Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookm=
ark...Same profile in Seamonkey 2.4.1 and Seamonkey 2.6.1 ?
I will switch a computer from windows to linux and from Seamonkey 2.6.1
to Seamonkey 2.4.1 (I don't know why Ubuntu only have 2.6.1 on Precise
I think there no big differences between these two releases that will
bring bug into profile. Am I false?
On my computer I directly use Seamonkey from Mozilla, on that computer I
don't want to have work, so I only keep Ubuntu repositories.
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
St�phane Gr�goire wrote:
> I will switch a computer from windows to linux and...SeaMonkey 2.1
An increasing number of features are diverging between Gecko 1.9.2 and
Gecko 1.9.3; this gives us a number of options, with pros and cons for
each, but please don't consider this an exhaustive list.
1. Stick with 1.9.2 for now, don't use 1.9.3 features at all
* Pro: We know what features we have to port
* Con: Lots of catching up on trunk after comm-central
forks/after releasing 2.1
2. Write code using feature detection for 1.9.3/backward
compatibility for 1.9.2
* Pro: More flexible than any other option
* Co...Seamonkey 2.1/2.2 breaking Java plugin support on Centos 5 Linux?
I'm a long-time user of Seamonkey, from since it was called Mozilla.
The recent 2.1 and 2.2 updates seem to have broken Java support on my Centos
5.5 box (32 bits) and I really can't figure this out.
Seamonkey is installed in /usr/local.
Starting from 2.1, the /usr/local/seamonkey/plugins directory is gone. As per
the release notes, plugins are now managed on a per-user basis in
So far, so good. I used to have a link in /usr/local/seamonkey/plugins pointing
to /usr/local/jre1.6.0_12/plugin/i386/ns7/libjavaplugin_oji.so (I install
Sun's...Dropping 1.9.2, Going 1.9.3 for SeaMonkey 2.1
here in the groups/lists]
I blogged on SeaMonkey 2.1 planning earlier in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-01/seamonkey_2_1_planning and also about
the fact that we have been unsure if we should go 1.9.2 or 1.9.3 in
terms of the platform there.
I sent mails to the SeaMonkey Council and a few quite active developers
in the last days, and asked for opinions on dropping support for 1.9.2
and going for firmly basing SeaMonkey 2.1 on Mozilla platform 1.9.3 instead.
Nobody was really against th...From 2.1.2 to 3.2 ?
Hi everyone!I've been away from DNN for quite some time, feels good to be back. Hi to anyone who remembers me.
Just starting to look at taking our intranet portal from 2.1.2 to, I guess, 3.2. We have 3rd party modules and custom code. Is there a best practice for the upgrade/migration? Just looking for some guidelines.
Thanks in advance.
I'm no expert, but I too had a 2.12 site in which I migrated to 3.1.1While researching the migration, many suggested that I had to remove all of my third party modules first. Then perform the upgrade. Then add as many third party DNN 3.x mod...Font rendering changes between SeaMonkey 2.1 and 2.3.3?
I finally decided to try updating from SeaMonkey 2.1. My first step was
to move to 2.3.3 because that's what I had in my download directory.
However, I immediately noticed that the rendering of my UI font (Midori)
is now wonky. Letters are spaced more widely, and rather unevenly,
making them quite uncomfortable to read.
Compare, SeaMonkey 2.1:
So, what changed in terms of font rendering between 2.1 and 2.3.3,
does anyone recall?
...Seamonkey 2.2-2.3.3 Individual History Item Will No Longer Delete :-(
I upgraded one of my installations of Seamonkey 2.0.14 to 2.2. Once I
had upgraded I noticed I was unable to delete history item in the
history window. I can however delete *.domain.com or www.doamin.com. I
figured this would have been fixed in a later Seamonkey update. But
after two or three more updates the problem continues. This happens on
clean installs as well as upgraded installations. Developers: Please
fix! I make heavy use of my history.
Bug 672429 - Deleting Browser History (Ctrl+H) is Fubar'd, Deleting
Far More then Wanted
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=...Never done upgrade before. Have a 2.1.2 site w/many custom (purchased) modules, some of which are no longer supported. Don't see *any* info in 3.1 install docs for 2.1.2 upgrade?
I'm about to try something very scary, and I've spent the last 5 or so
hours reading DNN 3.1 docs and doing searches here (sure which the
search worked better, like allowed sort by date??). Anyway, I
don't see *any* info on updating a 2.1.2 site to a 3.1 site. The
only examples all have machine key stuff and other stuff that's not an
issue (or is it?) w/2.1.2
Here's the situation:
1 I have localhost access to the site via remote desktop
2. I have disconnected backed up data and log files and reconnected
3. I have made a copy of the virtual folder.
No...updated 1.2.2 to 2.0.1 but still shows 1.2.2
I just reinstalled the SBS 6 with the NW6 SP3 Overly cd and i put web
access, iprint, dhcp/dns, naas on the initial install. I then proceded to
upgrade edir to 8.7.1 ( i updated jvm and the other stuff that 8.7.1
required first) and everything went great. I then udated imanager from
1.2.2. to 2.0.1 and the install went as expected no errors or anything.
Here is the problem when i surf to iManager with internet exploder 6 it
shows me i am using 1.2.2. I read the instructions and they talk about some
migrating but the direction don't match imanager 1.2.2 (i assume they are
reffe...SeaMonkey 2.1 release candidate 2 available for OS/2
I've uploaded the second release candidate for the upcoming SeaMonkey
2.1. There were no OS/2 specific changes compared to the recently
published release candidate 1. However, it should contain a few cross-
platform fixes for
bugs present in the first one.
You can get it from here:
BTW (from https://wiki.mozilla.org/SeaMonkey:Release_Process:2.1rc2)
"Version Number 'pre'
It was pointed out after our mirror push that the version 2.1rc2
reports as is 2.1p...