Upgraded from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???

Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
is there a reason?
0
Dean
5/16/2007 5:45:58 PM
📁 mozilla.support.firefox
📃 24319 articles.
⭐ 10 followers.

💬 7 Replies
👁️‍🗨️ 1668 Views


On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> is there a reason?
I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not
weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems"
process, and then Microsoft told me there is an upgrade available for
Firefox...but the Check for Updates feature said I have the
latest....so I dont know what's up :P  Im using 2.0.0.3, Mozilla/5.0
(Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/
2.0.0.3
0
adamh
5/16/2007 11:31:56 PM
Dean Kay wrote:
> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> is there a reason?
> 
Don't know why you are getting that message
2.0.0.2 was released on 27 Feb 2007
2.0.0.3 was released on 20 Mar 2007
2.0.0.3 fixed several regressions in 2.0.0.2 in fact

Don't use 2.0.0.2!
0
Moz
5/17/2007 12:49:20 AM
adamh wrote:
> On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
>> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
>> is there a reason?
> 
> I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not
> weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems"
> process, and then Microsoft told me there is an upgrade available for
> Firefox...but the Check for Updates feature said I have the
> latest....so I dont know what's up :P  Im using 2.0.0.3, Mozilla/5.0
> (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/
> 2.0.0.3
> 

Well, ask Vista what it is doing then <g> Its the one claiming there is 
an update available.

Firefox 2.0.0.3 is the latest Firefox release
0
Moz
5/17/2007 12:50:18 AM
On 16/05/2007 1:45 PM, _Dean Kay_ spoke thusly:
> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> is there a reason?
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
-- 
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird
mozilla.test.multimedia moderator
(Please do not email me tech support questions)
0
Chris
5/17/2007 7:00:06 AM
Dean Kay wrote:
> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> is there a reason?
> 
"https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710"
0
Nir
5/17/2007 11:18:04 AM
Let me preface this by saying I am a huge FireFox fan and the first
thing I do with a new OS is install FF and delete IE...
But I'm having a similar problem.
I'm running FF 2.0.0.3 on XP and have been getting random lockups when
I use ebay - not always, but often. Today it happened in Flickr as
well. The MS error checker makes an error report and comes back and
tells me that it's a FF problem and there's a new version of FF - but,
as we know, there isn't.
Any ideas?
On May 16, 6:50 pm, "Moz Champion (Dan)" <moz.champ...@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
> adamh wrote:
> > On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
> >> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> >> is there a reason?
>
> > I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not
> > weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems"
> > process, and then Microsoft told me there is an upgrade available for
> > Firefox...but the Check for Updates feature said I have the
> > latest....so I dont know what's up :P  Im using 2.0.0.3, Mozilla/5.0
> > (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/
> > 2.0.0.3
>
> Well, ask Vista what it is doing then <g> Its the one claiming there is
> an update available.
>
> Firefox 2.0.0.3 is the latest Firefox release

0
melsmom
5/17/2007 7:16:14 PM
melsmom@gmail.com wrote:
> Let me preface this by saying I am a huge FireFox fan and the first
> thing I do with a new OS is install FF and delete IE...
> 
> But I'm having a similar problem.
> 
> I'm running FF 2.0.0.3 on XP and have been getting random lockups when
> I use ebay - not always, but often. Today it happened in Flickr as
> well. The MS error checker makes an error report and comes back and
> tells me that it's a FF problem and there's a new version of FF - but,
> as we know, there isn't.
> 
> Any ideas?
> 
> On May 16, 6:50 pm, "Moz Champion (Dan)" <moz.champ...@sympatico.ca>
> wrote:
>> adamh wrote:
>>> On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update.  I was running 2.0.0.3.  The
>>>> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> 
>>>> is there a reason?
>>> I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not
>>> weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems"
>>> process, and then Microsoft told me there is an upgrade available for
>>> Firefox...but the Check for Updates feature said I have the
>>> latest....so I dont know what's up :P  Im using 2.0.0.3, Mozilla/5.0
>>> (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/
>>> 2.0.0.3
>> Well, ask Vista what it is doing then <g> Its the one claiming there is
>> an update available.
>>
>> Firefox 2.0.0.3 is the latest Firefox release
> 
> 

Please bottom post in these newsgroups. That is quote previous messages 
(or portions thereof) then write your reply, such as I have done
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
"https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710"
0
Moz
5/18/2007 3:17:58 AM
Reply: