Which Version 12.5.0.3, 12.5.0.4, 12.5.1
We are currrently running 11.9.2 on an old HPUX server (development). We are getting a newer HPUX server and our DBA is asking us which version we should install. It will be a clean install. Are there any major problems we may encounter when the 11.9.2 databases are installed/upgraded to any of the above version. We have numerous stored procs, views and triggers. Once all applications are fully tested, we will be upgrading the production server to whichever version we choose. I hope that made sense. TIA Scott ...

1.5.0.0.3 vs 1.5.0.0.4
I have had numerous difficulties with FF 1.5.0.0.4, in particular, some sites often just hang when I click on links. A particularly bad site is Dell http://www.dell.com/, which - when I try to configure a computer - gets all kinds of "waiting for dell" status bar messages. I tried it with a clean profile, to no avail. It works flawlessly with IE. I downloaded fresh copies of 1.5.0.3 and 1.5.0.4 with the intent of uninstalling the latter and then trying the former. *The uninstall process hung*. So I installed 1.5.0.3 on top of 1.5.0.4. The Dell site now works fl...

superreview granted: [Bug 341583] Bump Thunderbird version to 1.5.0.5 : [Attachment 225643] 1.5.0.4 -> 1.5.0.5
David Baron <dbaron@mozilla.com> has granted superreview: Bug 341583: Bump Thunderbird version to 1.5.0.5 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341583 Attachment 225643: 1.5.0.4 -> 1.5.0.5 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=225643&action=edit ...

superreview granted: [Bug 341582] bump version numbers for 1.5.0.5 release : [Attachment 225641] 1.5.0.4 -> 1.5.0.5
David Baron <dbaron@mozilla.com> has granted superreview: Bug 341582: bump version numbers for 1.5.0.5 release https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341582 Attachment 225641: 1.5.0.4 -> 1.5.0.5 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=225641&action=edit ...

Migrating 12.5.0 GA to 12.5.0.1
I installed the generally available release on solaris 8. I then went to back up and got a an error about block zero being an invalid block. Looking at the web, this was a known problem on partitions > 4GB in size, fixed in 12.5.0..1 I then went and download EBF 10700 (interum release) . It was not clear to me what EBF I should download. This release did not contain loc OCS libraries for 12.5.0.1. So I then have downloaded EBF 10423. BTW: I gunzip'ed 10700 and gnu un tared and got a directory check sum error?? Have looked over sybase site and am still unclear how it...

12.5.0.1 to 12.5.0.3 upgrade
We are planning to upgrade from 12.5.0.1 to 12.5.0.3 on Win NT After the upgradation the Sybase service did not start. The error encountered was: "Error 1053: The service did not respond to the start or control request in timely fashion" We reverted back to the previous setup and the service started and we could connect to the server. What could be wrong?? Perhaps you could post the Sybase errorlog. You should be able to find it under %SYBASE%\%SYBASE_ASE%\install\errorlog, unless it was given a different name during installation. <Mihir> wrote in message...

sp_helpexternlogin 12.5.0.1 --> 12.5.0.3
Hi, we are at the point of upgrading to 12.5.0.3, and I wonder whether a bug we are experiencing has been fixed in this new version. We use DirectConnect ( to Oracle), and sp_addexternlogin to specify the userid/passwd to be used at the remote end. These settings are per Sybase login and per remote destination, and we have two or three dozen, as shown by sp_helpexternlogin. Trouble is, every now and then all these settings disappear from the system, and we have to re-enter them manually. We can exclude foul play by now, i.e. no one has come to delete them. We are on Sol...

Limited options on AIX going from 12.5.0.1 to 12.5.0.3
We find the upgrade options on AIX 4.3.3 and ASE 12.5.0.1 quite limiting and frankly, just want to hear if anyone else feels such frustration. Since ASE 12.5.0.3 64-bit requires OS levels of AIX 5.1, we must combine the OS upgrade with the ASE binary upgrade in one event. Then there is no easy ASE version rollback plan, without rolling back OS. Woo is me. USAdba wrote: > We find the upgrade options on AIX 4.3.3 and ASE 12.5.0.1 quite limiting and > frankly, just want to hear if anyone else feels such frustration. Since ASE > 12.5.0.3 64-bit requires OS levels of AIX 5...

upgrade problem 12.0.0.4 to 12.5.0.3
I have the following problem during upgrade, when I load the DB dump from 12.0.0.4 to 12.5.0.3, the following problem occurs and the isql session is quit Object 'FinCorpFwdPnL' in database 'Kustom' is owned by login '' who does not exist in this server. Object 'FinCorpFxsPnL' in database 'Kustom' is owned by login '' who does not exist in this server. Object 'SP_ImportSpotQuotes' in database 'Kustom' is owned by login '' who does not exist in this server. Object 'SP_SalesCaptCtrl' in database 'Kustom...

Sybase ASE 12.5.0.1 / ASE 12.5.3 -- SUSE 8.0
The ASE CD-Rom eval version, we receive from Sybase works with no problem on SUSE 8.0. After trying so hard to install Sybase ASE from the net with no success, I asked Sybase to send me a copy of their evaluation ASE Linux version, this one worked with no twiking whatsover, except for the usual change required for the shared memory. I am know, for those who want to run it indefinately, this solution won't be much of a help, since there is a 60 day trial period limit on this one, so I am told. But, you might wanna try this until sybase posts one that works on SUSE 8.0. ...

ASE 12.0.0.6 to ASE 12.5 and Rep Server 12.1
We are planning the upgrade of our ASE 12.0.0.6 64bit on AIX 4.3.3 to ASE 12.5 64bit on AIX 4.3.3. We are also using Rep Server 12.1 with these two servers. My question is do I need to upgrade Rep Server as well, or will 12.1 Rep Server Work with ASE 12.5. Also, we will be upgrading AIX to 5.1 as well. Any advice is appreciated. Thanks, Troy It will work, however you wont be able to use any of the 12.5 new datatypes, and the rep_agents will spit out annoying error/warning messages everytime they are restarted. Our production system has been running that way for about ye...

latest browser release 1.5.0.5. does not work. 1.5.0.4. works fine
Name: bill foster Product: Firefox Summary: latest browser release 1.5.0.5. does not work. 1.5.0.4. works fine Comments: your latest update has in my opinion a problem. but first your updater does not ask if you wish to update it automatically downloads and installs. i do not like this approach. i should be given the option to choose and there should be a 'return to previous version' option. the latest version installs and after reopening it cannot find the mozilla site (or any others) stating the site cannot be found with an option to try again. Browser Details: ...

Upgrading from 5.0.0 to 5.1.1
This is Hisham Ayoub from Nicola Abu Khader & Sons (Jordan). We are currently using S-Designor 5.0.0 and have a complete designs on it. Just recently we have received the new upgrades for S-Designor 5.1.1 and updated our dictionary to be used with the new version. Our problem is that when we generated physical models and also when we generated the database generation scripts we received some WILD unexpected results and error messages. Mainly, S-Designor gave a sorts of error messages on the (a) constraints and its naming (b) Foreign key indexes and (c) tables were populated with...

Smoke [5.11.0] v5.11.0-12-gb9fb583 FAIL(F) openbsd 4.5 (i386/1 cpu)
Automated smoke report for 5.11.0 patch b9fb583619490a0ded37e01402169cea64f6c91e v5.11.0-12-gb9fb583 p5openbsd: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor ("AuthenticAMD" 686-class, 256KB L2 cache) (909 MHz) (i386/1 cpu) on openbsd - 4.5 using cc version 3.3.5 (propolice) smoketime 12 hours 45 minutes (average 1 hour 35 minutes) Summary: FAIL(F) O = OK F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom X = Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness ? = still running or test results not (yet) available Build failures during: - = unknown or N/A c = Configure, m = ...

Smoke [5.12.0] v5.12.0-RC0-1-gf19b804 FAIL(F) MSWin32 Win7 (Intel64/4 cpu)
Automated smoke report for 5.12.0 patch f19b8045021653e8223735f6828018ca450= 71243 v5.12.0-RC0-1-gf19b804 monolith: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz(~2394 MHz) (Intel64/4= cpu) on MSWin32 - Win7=20 using gcc version 3.4.5 smoketime 6 hours 9 minutes (average 46 minutes 10 seconds) Summary: FAIL(F) O =3D OK F =3D Failure(s), extended report at the bottom X =3D Failure(s) under TEST but not under harness ? =3D still running or test results not (yet) available Build failures during: - =3D unknown or N/A c =3D Configure, m =3D make, M =3D m...