Bugzilla feature suggestion: more per-product & per component defaults
Name: David Matten
Product: Other (please state)
Summary: Bugzilla feature suggestion: more per-product & per component defaults
per product: OS, Hardware, Component, (Product) Version
(designated "current version" for bugs, "unspecified" for enhancements)
per component: OS, Hardware, (Component) Version (designated "current
version" for bugs, "unspecified" for enhancements), Milestone
Browser Details: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50...Additional Bugzilla components for SeaMonkey.
Proposed additional Bugzilla components for SeaMonkey.
Comparison Firefox (left column) and SeaMonkey (right column).
Excluding components that already have equivalents in SeaMonkey.
Downloads Panel Download & File Handling
File Handling Download & File Handling
Help Documentation Help
Page Info Window Page Info
Plugin Click-To-Activate Whitelist Passwords & Permissions?
Private ...Bugzilla and localizations components/products
we're having two bugs open right now  that may or may not merge, and
I wonder where the off-the-bug discussion should be. Trying .governance.
We may want to have more than one bug component per locale on the one
hand, and we have more and more stuff tracked in bugs that's not
strictly "Client Software", like website bugs etc.
I'm wondering if we should move "Mozilla Localizations" from being a
product to being a category, and to have a product per locale. That's
default to just a single "General" component, but would have ...Can we get a bugzilla product/component?
I'd love to be able to watch all the bugs being filed, we should get our own product or component or whatever.
...Bugzilla Product component count limited ?
Are we limited in product's component count and name size, character
When I create a lot of components (42 for exemple) with accent (I'm french
... sorry) no warning, no error. I can edit, remove them ...
But I can't see them in the bug search query.cgi page.
The component list is empty ...
How strange, isn't it ?
...Error in Bugzilla adding a component to a Product
I was on 5.0 and had a problem adding a component to a Product. I was adding a
number of components and the first 3 worked but after that I got an error. I
upgraded to 5.0.1 to see if that had maybe cured the problem, but I'm afraid
I'm not a perl programmer so I'm a bit unsure of this and didn't find much on
a search for the problem. I'm also a bit confused by the error message given
that I was allowed to add components a few minutes before. If it thinks
something isn't installed then it wasn't installed before. Perhaps there's a
limit to the num...Bugzilla kills server on add product component
I tried installing Bugzilla 4.0.2 on Debian with apt-get, but it was quite d=
ifferent from the install from source so I installed it from source with Pos=
tgreSQL. It worked well. After some trying I dropped the db and re-run the P=
ERL configuration script to create a clean db.
Now all works well except that on create product component lately the whole D=
ebian hangs, one cannot even sash into it. Apparently this is due to many in=
stance of jsonrcp.cgi (or similarly named) running.
Is this enough information to pinpoint a possible problem?
Le 24....Localizing new bugzilla product and component names
we've set up a project on localize.m.o,
gather the translated bugzilla component names.
You won't need all strings if you're just doing Firefox, or just two of
the projects. If you're interested in localizing weave sync, start
filling that out already.
If you're localizing more than one of Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey,
please translate the toolkit component, too.
The translation don't need to be verbatim (lol), use something that
helps users to file new bugs right. The ...App manager and Dev Apps
I am experiencing problems to debug apps loaded in the App Manager. I don't
have this problem if the App is downloaded from the Marketpalce and
debugged with the App Manager. Is there a known problem to debug Dev Apps,
loaded from a directory in your computer?
...Should we rethink the set of components in the Toolkit bugzilla product?
It seems to me that any component shipped with XULRunner should have a
corresponding place to file bugs either in the Core product or the Toolkit
product. Right now, at least password manager is in the Firefox product
instead; I wouldn't be surprised if there are others.
Is my assumption about XULRunner correct? If so, someone who knows what we
actually ship in XULRunner should probably check on what things need to move to
Toolkit (or Core?).
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> It seems to me that any component shipped with XULRunner should have a
> corresponding pla...Can a bug in bugzilla belong to multiple products/components?
As it is not easy to generate a solid model of some very complex
real-world situations, sometimes a bug may be related to more than one
product and / or components of a product
Can a bug in bugzilla belong to multiple products/components?
Victor Sinceac wrote:
> As it is not easy to generate a solid model of some very complex
> real-world situations, sometimes a bug may be related to more than one
> product and / or components of a product
> Can a bug in bugzilla belong to multiple products/components?
No. That way lies madness :-) People ...Bugzilla Configuration, best practice for classification, product, component
is there a best practice guide for configuration usage of the
hierarchy classification, product and component?
I want to use Bugzilla not only for Bug Tracking, but also for
The Idea is:
an requirement is handled pretty much the same as a bug, its an issue
handled by Bugzilla.
Later on a requirement can lead to a Change Request ore several Change
requests which are tracked by Bugzilla and
attached to this initial requirement issue.
Has anybody worked with such approach and can point me to some
documentation how to setup such
a system or to an...DB2/NT Development App vs.Test App vs. Production App
We are encountering a situation where we are using a unique owner name
(DEVLDBA.tablenames) for our DB2/NT tables in our development
environment. We don't want to change the DW SQL <owner name> when we
move the application to test(TESTDBA.tablenames)environment and again
when we move to production(PRODDBA.tablenames).
Any suggestions on how to accomplish this? Thanks.
The key to this is having datawindows created without qualifying the table
names. This is done by default whenever you create a datawindow against
tables owned by the current user. For instance, if you...