From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 3.0.1, 3.1.1, 2.22.3, and 2.20.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Today the Bugzilla project has four releases!
3.0.1 is the first bug-fix release for the 3.0 series. 3.0 was very
stable, but 3.0.1 adds a lot of little polish fixes that greatly improve
the experience of using Bugzilla.
3.1.1 is our first development release toward Bugzilla 3.2. It has
a huge number of new features, but is EXTREMELY UNSTABLE. It has not
been tested, and should not be used in a production environment. It may
fail in critical ways, or destro...Enigmail-1.0.1 for OS/2 TB-3.0.x and SM-2.0.x available at enigmail.mozdev.org
I'm glad to announce that after a while, where some smaller quirks had
to be ironed out, enigmail-1.0.1 can be downloaded from
enigmail.mozdev.org. Thanks to the developers for the upload to their
site. Enigmail-1.0.1 works only with Thunderbird-3.0.x and
Seamonkey-2.0.x. If you still use TB-2.0.0.x or SM-1.1.x you should
stick to enigmail-0.95.7.
In case of trouble please post to this list here.
Have Fun, Walter
...enigmail-1.0.1 for TB-3.0.x and enigmail-1.1.2 for TB-3.1.x available
enigmail-1.0.1 (TB-3.0.x) and enigmail-1.1.2 (TB-3.1.x) are available
at http://enigmail.mozdev.org. Note for Seamonkey-2.0.x you can
download and install enigmail-1.0.1.
Have fun, Walter
...Bug DNN 3.1.1 Upgrade from 2.1.2 -> 3.1.0 ->
Somewhere along the process, (I missed when) a portal upgrade created a problem with portal creation. The site is created fine, but the password for the admin is never correct. I have to use host to correct it. Anyone faced this ?Do you know the truth when you hear it?
are you using the same hash keys in your web.config? this got me one time-DarrenNeese.com-DNN ROCKS!-DeveloperSchool.com
Thanks, this helped me narrow it down and realize it was possibly the upgrade from DNN2 to DNN 3. Since there are no hash keys in DNN2 because it uses an encryption key, how did you solve it?Do you know ...Automated cleanup tool to remove the .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, 2.0, 3.0 and 3.5
"I have posted an updated version of the .NET Framework cleanup tool
that now contains support for automatically cleaning up the .NET
Framework 1.0, the .NET Framework 1.1, the .NET Framework 2.0, the
..NET Framework 3.0 and the .NET Framework 3.5.
This tool automates the manual cleanup steps for the .NET Framework
2.0 that I posted a while ago. These steps have helped solve most of
the known .NET Framework 2.0 beta uninstall issues that I know of. In
addition, the tool can be useful to return your system to a known
(relatively clean) state in case you run into any .NET Framew...SeaMonkey 1.0.1 and Firefox 1.5, 2.0, 3.0 version can be said to be a same at code level
I am pursuing my research in the field of sotware maintainence at
preventive level. i had published some of my research paper in ACM SIGSOFT
SEN. As per my research i designed the metrics model for smelly classes
with the help of firefox three versions and then i had validated or tested
the metrics model with the one version of SeaMonkey.
I got the review upon my research that SeaMonkey and Firefox are same at
the code level. These cannot be treated as two different data set. But what
i had read is they both only usage the same Gecko engine from your website.
Some more from yo...1)Version 220.127.116.11.3 License fee? 2)IE Autofill equivalent available in FF?
Name: Will Ozier
Summary: 1)Version 18.104.22.168.3 License fee? 2)IE Autofill equivalent available in FF?
I have two issues:
1) About three weeks ago, on the recommendation of a friend, and because
I was having problems with Internet Explorer (IE), I went online to
order Firefox. Somehow, in the process, I was hooked into a website
(either http:www.mysoftwareprovider.com or My XP Tools) that required a
credit card number and which billed me for a "3 year membership for a
total of 39 $ USD" and for "My XP Tool...Differences between .net 1, .net 1.1, .net 2.0 and .net 3.0 #2
Hi, This seems to be a common question, but i havent got an answer yet:(Can, any one please explain me the differences between these versions.If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have trouble putting on your pants!
There are too many differences for one email - - from 1.0 to 1.1 (not a whole lot of real change, other than fixes, at least compared to 1.1 to 2.0)
With 2.0, there were many new declarative controls, with many new ideas added in
With 3.0, it's a superset of 2.0 - instead of replacing the installation completely, it just 'added on' new functionality - I would...D.O.S. with Groupwise Messenger 1.0.1, 1.0.2 and 1.0.3
I reported this in the Groupwise Mesenger forum to no avail. I'll try my
luck here :-)
If you run a 'snmpwalk' on a Netware server running Groupwise
Messenger V1.0.1 to V1.0.3) with _MESSENGER_ SNMP enabled, it will abend the
server. With version 1.0.2 and 1.0.3, if you disable the Messenger SNMP,
server won't abend but will only report SNMP info for Netware (and Groupwise
if loaded and SNMP enabled).
Can be easily tested by running the win32 snmpwalk from
like this :
snmpwal...selecting ? selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6. is slow (1-3 second) then selecting of 7.,8.,9. go on is so fast (0.1 second or more fast).. how can i get fast for selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6
selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4.(sometime even 5., 6.) is slow (1-3 second) then selecting of 7.,8.,9.(sometimes 5., 6.,) go on is so fast (0.1 second or more fast).. how can i get fast for selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6. is slow ?? recordcount is almost 1.050.000.. i do selecting 1.2.3. go on same page with treeview1.. treeview1 in masterpage.master..
gridview1 and datasource1 are in pagelist.aspx (it connets datasource1)..productnumber is primarykey for index.. kategori, kategori1 and kategori2, price, datemin are index from keys/index in table1 (right clicking menu)....kaffeine 1.0, amarok 2.3.1 and ktorrent 4.0.0 for openSUSE 11.3?
Does anyone knows if kaffeine 1.0, amarok 2.3.1 and ktorrent 4.0.0 will
make it in time for openSUSE 11.3's release?
11.3 toolchain is already frozen, so no, they will not.
"Лучше молчать и прослыть дураком, чем
открыть рот и развеять все сомнения."
Minton's Profile: http://forums.opensuse.org/member.php?userid=15228
View this thread: http://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.p...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 3.2.1, 3.0.7, 2.22.7, and 3.3.2
Today we have some major security improvements for Bugzilla in the
form of four releases. We strongly recommend that all Bugzilla
administrators read the Security Advisory for these releases, which is
linked below in this email.
Bugzilla 3.2.1 is our latest stable release. It contains various
useful bug fixes in addition to major security improvements.
Bugzilla 3.0.7 and Bugzilla 2.22.7 are security updates for their
Bugzilla 3.3.2 is an unstable development release. In addition to the
security fixes that all the other releases contain, this release
contains n...unable to instal latest 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 upgrades due NO WIN32
Name: Miep Visser
Summary: unable to instal latest 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 upgrades due NO WIN32
What is going on here?
We have the layesy VISTA OS, and never had this response before.
Browser Details: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)
From URL: http://hendrix.mozilla.org/
Note to readers: Hendrix gives no expectation of a response to this feedback
but if you wish to provide one you must BCC (not CC) the sender for them t...