Amarok 2.0.1 does't play mp3's after upgrade to KDE 4.2.1
Today I've upgraded my openSUSE 11.1 for x86_64 to KDE 4.2.1 from
buildservice. As a result, Amarok 2.0.1 stopped playing mp3s. Clicking
on the same track several times results in a "Too many errors
encountered in playlist" message, and the ~/.xsession-errors file gets
the following line for each click on a track:
QString::arg: Argument missing: Amarok - No track playing., 0:00
kdeinit4: preparing to launch
xine is asking to seek behind the end of the data stream
xine is asking to seek behind the end of the data stream
QString::arg: Argument missing: Amaro...Darik's Boot and Nuke
Is Darik's Boot and Nuke, http://dban.sourceforge.net/ an effective
tool? Can you suggest alternatives?
On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:05:52 -0700, Neo Phyte <Neo_Phyte@invalid.com>
>Is Darik's Boot and Nuke, http://dban.sourceforge.net/ an effective
>tool? Can you suggest alternatives?
From somewhere on the University of Washington site...
I have a copy you can download if youwant to try it.
It may or may not be related in some way to Derik's
Rudy...Darik's Boot And Nuke
Has anyone successfully tried making a hard-disk wiping floppy with Darik's
Boot And Nuke?
In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Daze@microchip.com says...
> Has anyone successfully tried making a hard-disk wiping floppy with Darik's
> Boot And Nuke?
I have done that successfully form this one:
BE AWARE though that it will wipe ALL disks connected to the computer.
"Jaapvs&quo...Dban ( Darik's Boot and Nuke)
I think this is the correct forum to ask this question.
I want to completely erase a hard drive. Listening to "Security Now!", it
becomes clear that the tool to use is Darik's Boot and Nuke.
Where do I download this from?
In <email@example.com> from a foreign land far far away.....
Luc R responded:
| Hi all,
| I think this is the correct forum to ask this question.
| I want to completely erase a hard drive. Listening to "Security Now!", it
| becomes clear that the tool to use is Darik's Boot...Can I Execute An ASP.NET 1.1 Application's ASPX Page By Using Server.Execute From An ASP.NET 2.0 Application's ASPX Page
Hi All,Can someone help on this?I have 2 ASP.NET applications, 1 built in 1.1 and the other on 2.0In 1 of the aspx pages in my ASP.NET 2.0 application, I do Server.Execute and call another aspx page which is part of the ASP.NET 1.1 application. On doing this, I get this error: Invalid path for child request. A virtual path is expected.Is there any solution for this except for using Response.Redirect (WHICH I CANT USE). If not then can someone suggest a wayout for this:Whenever a new user signs up in my ASP.NET 2.0 application, I need to create a new user in my ASP.NET 1.1...Replace 1's and 0's in a gridview column with Yes's and No's
Is it possible to change the display of a column in a gridview to show a Yes for all 1's and a No for 0's that display in a particular column of a gridview bound to a database? If so, can someone share the way with me? I am using ASP.NET 2.0 with VB Code Behind.
One way you can do is thrrough CASE in your select statement:
Select YesNoColumn= CASE yourColumn
WHEN 1 THEN 'Yes'
WHEN 0 THEN 'No'
ELSE '' END
<Columns> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="yourHeader" SortExpression="yourDataField"> ...To Secure Boot or Not To Secure Boot...
I just bought a new desktop which of course had Windows 8 installed.
Just my opinion, but I don't think Windows 8 is the turd it's made out
be. I loaded Classic Shell to get the start menu back and it's
basically back to normal Windows--except that they've taken away Aero
and everything looks like Windows 3.1 again.
Regardless, after doing a lot of reading about Secure Boot and the
associated problems I wanted to try to dual boot Win 8 with Kubuntu.
I never got out of the gate. For some reason I can't get Kubuntu 13.04
to boot from usb or cd with secure ...Dual booting 11.2 & W7 while keeping W7's boot manager intact.
Hey guys, I'm finally decided to try Linux again and I chose to go with
Suse this time. I have a question about configuring Linux's boot
First, my Windows partition and the future Suse partition will be on
different HDDs, so this should ease things a bit.
What I want is:
Suse is on HDD 2 and Windows on HDD 1
HDD 2 will be the default Master drive, so I want GRUB to give me to
option to boot either on Suse, either on Windows 7
I want to keep Windows 7 boot manager intact. I.E. If I switch HDD 1 to
the Master drive, it will boot directly into Win 7.
What I wante...PC-BSD 9 dual booting in openSUSE's 12.1's GRUB
'Dual Booting - PC-BSD Wiki'
I add Other System, at SDA 3 partition (PC-BSD's ZFS parititon) in Yast
boot loader Window, but it won't work. The PC-BSD 9 installation said
completed, restart when ready. No errors
> 'Dual Booting - PC-BSD Wiki'
> I add Other System, at SDA...Firefox 184.108.40.206 breaks Replicon's WebTimeSheet 7.2 software.
Name: Chris Hecker
Summary: Firefox 220.127.116.11 breaks Replicon's WebTimeSheet 7.2 software.
The 18.104.22.168 release of Firefox stops this software (see
www.replicon.com) from working properly. Firefox 3 also won't work with
Firefox 22.214.171.124 and previous does work properly. IE 7 and previous
also works properly.
Apparently, 126.96.36.199 propagated something from Firefox 3 that breaks the
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/20080829 ...Boot.msg error:/boot/System.map-184.108.40.206-0.1-default
I recently updated my system from opensuse 11.0 to 11.1; by checking
the logs I noticed a boot.msg error that I wish to show below:
Cannot find map file.
No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled
The strange fact is that system booting is perfect and I am not
noticing any error or troubles, other than the failure of my laptop
soft-key (HP Pavillion DV6230) to control system audio (on/off and
volume stop to work).
By issuing a:
depmod -ae -F /boot/System.map-220.127.116.11-0.1-default
I see that some modul...18.104.22.168 Says it found new version, but it's 22.214.171.124
The Updated version dialog pops up and says the latest version is
126.96.36.199, but I'm running 188.8.131.52! I went ahead and did the update, and
sure enough, I now have 184.108.40.206. And when I check for updates, it
says there are no new versions. Did Mozilla do this on purpose? Is
this happening to anyone besides me?
> The Updated version dialog pops up and says the latest version is
> 220.127.116.11, but I'm running 18.104.22.168! I went ahead and did the update, and
> sure enough, I now have 22.214.171.124. And when I check for updates, it
> says there are no new...D.O.S. with Groupwise Messenger 1.0.1, 1.0.2 and 1.0.3
I reported this in the Groupwise Mesenger forum to no avail. I'll try my
luck here :-)
If you run a 'snmpwalk' on a Netware server running Groupwise
Messenger V1.0.1 to V1.0.3) with _MESSENGER_ SNMP enabled, it will abend the
server. With version 1.0.2 and 1.0.3, if you disable the Messenger SNMP,
server won't abend but will only report SNMP info for Netware (and Groupwise
if loaded and SNMP enabled).
Can be easily tested by running the win32 snmpwalk from
like this :
snmpwal...firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible with SM 2.26.1
firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not comaptible
with SM 2.26.1
I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
what ? :-)
Ray_Net wrote, On 14/07/2014 10:48:
> firebug-2.0.1-fx.xpi could not be installed because it's not
> comaptible with SM 2.26.1
> I just upgraded to SM 2.26.1 and i cannot use the FireBug addon - so
> what ? :-)
FireBug downloaded from
So normally it should be installable ...
On 07/15/2014 02:27 AM, Ray_Net wrote: