Hi, I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management system. Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff for books and provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via an email request to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. Phillip Flores
Phillip Flores wrote: > Hi, > > I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management > system. Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff > for books and provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via > an email request to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). > Since both Delphi for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop > the app, which one will allow me to deliver it in less time and also > increase (even how small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. PHP hands down for the marketing part. Delphi Prism is hardly known outside the Delphi community. --
Hi Phillip, > which one will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase > (even how small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. The Delphi Prism plugin inside Visual Studio should do the trick for you. Delphi for PHP may cause more confusion (it's not your average PHP) and may lock you into the VCL for PHP, which is a bigger problem than the Delphi Prism language will be for your ASP.NET projects or your marketability as developer. > Phillip Flores Groetjes, Bob Swart -- Bob Swart Training & Consultancy (eBob42.com) Forever Loyal to Delphi CodeGear Technology Partner -- CodeGear RAD Studio Reseller (BeNeLux) Delphi Win32 & .NET books on Lulu.com: http://stores.lulu.com/drbob42 Personal courseware + e-mail support http://www.ebob42.com/courseware Blog: http://www.drbob42.com/blog - RSS: http://eBob42.com/weblog.xml
Phillip Flores wrote: > Hi, > > I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management system. > Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff for books and > provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via an email request > to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. > > Phillip Flores May want to look at 3rd Rail instead of PHP. Rails is really, really good for getting sites up quickly! Plus scalability may be a tad better, since you can always take the Rails apps to JRuby and use the Java JVM to tie into any Java apps and libraries.
"Phillip Flores"wrote in message news:90315@forums.codegear.com... > to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. You dont offer much info... for example, are you even going to be using Windows-based servers? In any event, unless you have Delphi code you need to re-use, plain old PHP (not delphi for php) would be the better option for several reasons... - it doesnt require the library to have a proprietary development tool - your app can run on linux/unix/windows servers, so the library can use what they want for a web server (without **** around with mono). - php programmers are everywhere, so if you leave the project and the library needs someone else to work on it, a programmer can be found easily. - If you want to increase your web developer marketability, PHP's probably a better language to familiarize yourself with. (the above 'pros' for PHP also probably apply to Python and Ruby)
If speed is what you required. Nothing beats a fast development on a very familiar environment. I suggest taking a look at for VCL for the Web aka Intraweb. I can't wait to see what the guys at Atozed are preparing for their next release. > {quote:title=Phillip Flores wrote:}{quote} > Hi, > > I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management system. > Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff for books and > provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via an email request > to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. > > Phillip Flores
> {quote:title=Phillip Flores wrote:}{quote} Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Why don't you use Delphi 2008 with IntraWeb? We use it with great success! -- Roman
1- For Intraweb, third party component support nearly not exist. 2- Usually, delphi developer can't show intraweb future, but asp.net not same with delphi prism. 3- Intraweb develop speed very slow. With Best Regards. Ferruh Koroglu Web : http://www.teksdata.com Blog : Teksdata Blog "Roman KaÃebaum" <=?Utf-8?Q?Roman_Ka=C3=9Febaum?=> wrote in message news:90746@forums.codegear.com... >> {quote:title=Phillip Flores wrote:}{quote} > Since both Delphi >> for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one >> will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how >> small) my marketability as a web developer? > > Why don't you use Delphi 2008 with IntraWeb? We use it with great success! > > -- > Roman
Ferruh Koroglu wrote: > 1- For Intraweb, third party component support nearly not exist. TMS and Arcana provide a plethora of options. In particular, the way that TMS has Ajax-enabled their key IntraWeb components is tremendously useful. > 2- Usually, delphi developer can't show intraweb future, but asp.net not > same with delphi prism. It existed before asp.net, and is not only being maintained, but actively developed. And deployment options vastly better. > 3- Intraweb develop speed very slow. Huh? You must be confusing IntraWeb with InterDev. InterDev is no longer supported by Microsoft :) It's far faster than developing with PHP, Rails or any other framework I have used. Loren sZendre
Maybe.
developed. And deployment options vastly better.
0
![]()
Ferruh 3/10/2009 5:53:38 PM
Ferruh Koroglu wrote: > TMS and Arcana provide a plethora of options. In particular, the way > that TMS > has Ajax-enabled their key IntraWeb components is tremendously useful. > > Only two ! > Unfortunately not capable for advanced project Not capable for advanced project? You might have a hard time convincing the thousands of users that have created huge, complicated, highly-useful frameworks and large applications using IntraWeb, including myself. These large applications not only perform very well, they are also very scalable. > It existed before asp.net, and is not only being maintained, > Maybe. > > but actively developed. And deployment options vastly better. > > Yes, but where advanced features ? > Who is knowing ? What advanced features are you talking about? Are you referring to IntraWeb's Ajax support, or its ability to use JQuery, or Silverlight videos? What specifically are you talking about? Loren sZendre0
![]()
Loren 3/10/2009 6:13:01 PM
I'm respecting to your ideas. But I to be curious about interdev and intraweb both ! Is possible using intraweb on the interdev ? Please send to me document or simple movie (avi, mpeg or another !) With Best Regards. Ferruh Koroglu "Loren Szendre"wrote in message news:90956@forums.codegear.com... > Ferruh Koroglu wrote: >> TMS and Arcana provide a plethora of options. In particular, the way >> that TMS >> has Ajax-enabled their key IntraWeb components is tremendously useful. >> >> Only two ! >> Unfortunately not capable for advanced project > > Not capable for advanced project? You might have a hard time convincing > the > thousands of users that have created huge, complicated, highly-useful > frameworks > and large applications using IntraWeb, including myself. These large > applications not only perform very well, they are also very scalable. > >> It existed before asp.net, and is not only being maintained, >> Maybe. >> >> but actively developed. And deployment options vastly better. >> >> Yes, but where advanced features ? >> Who is knowing ? > > What advanced features are you talking about? Are you referring to > IntraWeb's > Ajax support, or its ability to use JQuery, or Silverlight videos? What > specifically are you talking about? > > Loren sZendre 0
![]()
Ferruh 3/10/2009 6:52:48 PM
> 1- For Intraweb, third party component support nearly not exist. We are using the TMS components. They are fantastic. > 2- Usually, delphi developer can't show intraweb future, but asp.net not > same with delphi prism. I'm not able to have a look to the future, but actually the intraweb components are developed. > 3- Intraweb develop speed very slow. We found for example a bug in the TMS components and they fixed it within a week. Our goal was to migrate the existing Delphi desktop application to a web application, so we first tried asp.net with Delphi.net but the Delphi.net compiler was horrible. Now it would be an idea to use the Prism compiler but it is difficult to compile the same code with Delphi and with Prism. But we will try it with the next version of Delphi. We also tried Delphi for PHP but then we have to rewrite the whole code. -- With best regards Roman0
![]()
Roman 3/10/2009 8:27:14 PM
Phillip Flores ha scritto: > Hi, > > I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management system. > Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff for books and > provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via an email request > to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. > > Phillip Flores Delphi + Intraweb +1 We have started with intraweb over older ASP model in last 4-5 months and it is far more productive (especially with TMS ones) and offer great code reuse. I am wondering however, apart IW for std web apps, what would you folks recommend, apart Delphi PRISM + ASP.NET for future webservices development. Would you count rather on websnap/win32 wservices or better on ASP.NET ones? Regards, B.0
![]()
Zlatibor 3/10/2009 11:31:39 PM
Zlatibor Urosevic wrote: > I am wondering however, apart IW for std web apps, what would you > folks recommend, apart Delphi PRISM + ASP.NET for future webservices > development. One of the following: RTC SDK http://www.realthinclient.com RO SDK: http://remobjects.com kbmMW: http://www.components4developers.com All 3 have good reputations and loyal users. RTC SDK - Probably a little more flexible, thus requires more hand coding, but it's very solid and has great performance. RO SDK - Great design time tools, built-in diversity for message formats and communication channels. Versions for Win32, .Net, and soon XCode (OSX). Great database framwork via their Data Abstract produt. It also has SOAP out of the box, if you need it. kbmMW - I've never used it, so can't comment, but a lot of people like it. I've used both RO and RTC since their first versions and continue to use both of their latest versions. Which one I prefer comes down to the task at hand. -- Kevin Powick0
![]()
Kevin 3/11/2009 12:49:42 AM
> I've used both RO and RTC since their first versions and continue to > use both of their latest versions. Which one I prefer comes down to > the task at hand. > If you don't mind to share... for which tasks you think is best suited RO and for which RTC?0
![]()
Roberto 3/11/2009 9:31:08 AM
Roberto Icardi wrote: > If you don't mind to share... for which tasks you think is best > suited RO and for which RTC? Most of my work is for clients, so it often comes down to their needs. Some have certain platform choices or communication and protocol requirements, such as SOAP (which RTC doesn't yet support out of the box). When looking at a new project, I don't automatically choose one product over the other, but tend to start with RTC because I can quickly prototype and code by composition. I find this is a little more difficult with RO becuase it is driven by interfaces generated by their "Service Builder", and making frequent changes to your design means a bit of messing around with updating the generated code. On the less tangible side, I feel RTC gives me more freedom/flexibility, while RO gives more structure and out of the box features. Over the life of a project, I don't find that I'm more productive in one over the other, but as I said in my previous post, RTC usually involves more hand-coding. As with most development tools, flexibility and convenience are usually inversely proportional to each other. -- Kevin Powick0
![]()
Kevin 3/11/2009 2:03:26 PM
Phillip Flores wrote: > Hi, > > I have the opportunity to develop a web-based library management system. > Nothing fancy, just being able to do the usual CRUD stuff for books and > provide a search facility. Borrowing is to be done via an email request > to the library admin who then sends out the book(s). Since both Delphi > for PHP and Delphi PRISM will enable me to develop the app, which one > will allow me to deliver it in less time and also increase (even how > small) my marketability as a web developer? Thanks. > > Phillip Flores If you are just aiming for basic CRUDE functionality then it would be better to go with PHP and use Dreamweaver CS3 or higher. You will be able to implement almost every operation without coding a single line of PHP. It is better than Delphi 4 PHP and Delphi PRISM is another beast altogether. For PRISM to work you will have to have a hosting provider supporting ..NET this means only Windows based servers will do. HTH0
![]()
Yogi 3/13/2009 4:23:21 AM
Yogi Yang wrote: > > For PRISM to work you will have to have a hosting provider supporting > .NET this means only Windows based servers will do. Mono on Linux is also an option for ASP.NET + Prism. http://mono-project.com/ASP.NET -- Regards Jens0
![]()
Utf 3/13/2009 9:47:52 AM
Reply:
(Thread closed)