Header and Footer user control contains <html>, <body>, and <form> elements
Hi,
I have read that we can not/should not use html, body and form tag in the user control. But here these tags are used in the Header control.
I would like to know that although we can use those tags in User Control, should we use or should we follow other alternative for this.
Thanks in advance,
----------------------------
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cpguide/html/cpconcreatingpageletcontrol.asp
|
0 |
|
nmahesh567
5/19/2004 11:35:34 AM
asp.net.issue-tracker-kit
722 articles. 
0 followers.
0 Replies
1000 Views
Similar Artilces:
How to strip a string of <html>, ,</html>, <body>, </body>, <form ... >, </form> tags?
I have stream which is the HTML input of a page. Now I want to use only that part of this page, that is within <form .....> and </form> tags, and excluding these tags.How would I go about stripping <html>, ,</html>, <body>, </body>, <form ... >, </form>, <head> and </head> tags? I have to make sure that <head ...javascript..> and its corresponding </head> tags are not stripped in this process.sun21170 Wait... you said you wanted to strip the head tags, and you're also saying you need to NOT strip the ...
>>>> Heads up <<<<
I just got a warning from Norton that "PamelaSetup-Basic.exe" has a virus in it. The name is "VirusBurst" Luckily, I did not install this software and Norton's quarantined it so I could delte it, which I have done. Symantec has not completed analysis of this particular piece of garbage but it did catch the sig. If you have installed Pamela, you may be in trouble. Duffy wrote: > I just got a warning from Norton that "PamelaSetup-Basic.exe" has a virus > in it. The name is "VirusBurst" > > Luckily, I did not install...
superreview granted: [Bug 57717] view-source on blank page shows <html><body></body></html> : [Attachment 150636] remove the generated stuff
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> has granted Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>'s request for superreview: Bug 57717: view-source on blank page shows <html><body></body></html> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57717 Attachment 150636: remove the generated stuff http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=150636&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> Looks good. ...
>>>> ROOT Exploit in SAMBA <<<<<<
"A flaw has been detected in the Samba main smbd code which could allow an external attacker to remotely and anonymously gain Super User (root) privileges on a server running a Samba server. This flaw exists in previous versions of Samba from 2.0.x to 2.2.7a inclusive. This is a serious problem and all sites should either upgrade to Samba 2.2.8 immediately or prohibit access to TCP ports 139 and 445." http://us3.samba.org/samba/samba.html Binaries are available from Samba for RedHat, and some other distributions. So far as I can tell, the RedHat update mirrors I norm...
C<< >> vs C<< >> vs C<< x >>
Ugh. So we all know that there's this syntax for formatting codes (n=E9s "interio= r sequences") like C<< x >>. And that tokenizes as three tokens: "C<< ", open-C code "x", content " >>" close-code matching the C open-code And this is explicated by what I wrote in perlpodspec where I say that such a code... * starts with a capital letter (just US-ASCII [A-Z]) followed by two or more "<"'s, one or more whitespace characters, * any number of characters * one or more whit...
>>>> BUY RAM <<<<
.. ~~~*@@@*~~~ ================================================== ================================================== ENTER HERE: >>> http://web-for-you.cn/about/buy-ram <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...
>>>> CAPITALS GAMES <<<<
.. ~~~!!!~~~ ================================================== ================================================== CLICK HERE TO ENTER: >>> http://web-paradise.cn/3/capitals-games <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....
<html:html><html:body><html:input xul:persist="value">
I have an HTML administration and I'd like make it use of XUL's @persist great feature without andy browser-dependant conditions. Is there a way how to take advantage of @persist in normal HTML page viewed by Mozilla? Requirements: 1. HTML elements must not include namespace prefix - it must stay 'html', 'body' etc. 2. No extra XUL elements such as root xul:window etc. - still have fully IE compatible code. 3. Try to avoid Javascript magic that appends XUL xul:window element etc. Is possible something like this? --- <html xmlns="h...
Custom Composite Control
Let's start with what I'm looking for: <controls:MyWrapper id="Blah" runat="server"> <content> <controls:Exporter id="Blah1" runat="server" {This control has an image button and some other controls} /> <controls:GridView {This is a fully functional GridView} /> <controls:CustomFooterDetailer id="Yadda" runat="server" /> &nb...
>>>> BLU-RAY MOVIES <<<<
.. ~~~!!!~~~ ================================================== ================================================== CLICK HERE TO ENTER: >>> http://web-paradise.cn/2/blu-ray-movies <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....
superreview granted: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redunda
neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> has granted Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net>'s request for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> >+ if...
superreview requested: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redun #3
Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net> has asked neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ...
superreview requested: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redun #2
Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net> has asked Robert O'Callahan (Novell) <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ...
[PATCH] correctly handle C<< >> and C<<< >>> in diagnostics
This is just a quick hack; ideally someone would make it use an actual pod parser. --- perl/lib/diagnostics.pm.orig 2003-12-30 15:48:47.000000000 -0800 +++ perl/lib/diagnostics.pm 2004-05-25 01:54:31.735904000 -0700 @@ -314,10 +314,10 @@ sub noop { return $_[0] } # spensive for a noop sub bold { my $str =$_[0]; $str =~ s/(.)/$1\b$1/g; return $str; } sub italic { my $str = $_[0]; $str =~ s/(.)/_\b$1/g; return $str; } - s/[BC]<(.*?)>/bold($1)/ges; + s/C<<< (.*?) >>>|C<< (.*?) >>|[BC]<(.*?)>/bold($+)/ges; ...
I have stream which is the HTML input of a page. Now I want to use only that part of this page, that is within <form .....> and </form> tags, and excluding these tags.How would I go about stripping <html>, ,</html>, <body>, </body>, <form ... >, </form>, <head> and </head> tags? I have to make sure that <head ...javascript..> and its corresponding </head> tags are not stripped in this process.sun21170 Wait... you said you wanted to strip the head tags, and you're also saying you need to NOT strip the ...
>>>> Heads up <<<<
I just got a warning from Norton that "PamelaSetup-Basic.exe" has a virus in it. The name is "VirusBurst" Luckily, I did not install this software and Norton's quarantined it so I could delte it, which I have done. Symantec has not completed analysis of this particular piece of garbage but it did catch the sig. If you have installed Pamela, you may be in trouble. Duffy wrote: > I just got a warning from Norton that "PamelaSetup-Basic.exe" has a virus > in it. The name is "VirusBurst" > > Luckily, I did not install...
superreview granted: [Bug 57717] view-source on blank page shows <html><body></body></html> : [Attachment 150636] remove the generated stuff
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> has granted Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>'s request for superreview: Bug 57717: view-source on blank page shows <html><body></body></html> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57717 Attachment 150636: remove the generated stuff http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=150636&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> Looks good. ...
>>>> ROOT Exploit in SAMBA <<<<<<
"A flaw has been detected in the Samba main smbd code which could allow an external attacker to remotely and anonymously gain Super User (root) privileges on a server running a Samba server. This flaw exists in previous versions of Samba from 2.0.x to 2.2.7a inclusive. This is a serious problem and all sites should either upgrade to Samba 2.2.8 immediately or prohibit access to TCP ports 139 and 445." http://us3.samba.org/samba/samba.html Binaries are available from Samba for RedHat, and some other distributions. So far as I can tell, the RedHat update mirrors I norm...
C<< >> vs C<< >> vs C<< x >>
Ugh. So we all know that there's this syntax for formatting codes (n=E9s "interio= r sequences") like C<< x >>. And that tokenizes as three tokens: "C<< ", open-C code "x", content " >>" close-code matching the C open-code And this is explicated by what I wrote in perlpodspec where I say that such a code... * starts with a capital letter (just US-ASCII [A-Z]) followed by two or more "<"'s, one or more whitespace characters, * any number of characters * one or more whit...
>>>> BUY RAM <<<<
.. ~~~*@@@*~~~ ================================================== ================================================== ENTER HERE: >>> http://web-for-you.cn/about/buy-ram <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ...
>>>> CAPITALS GAMES <<<<
.. ~~~!!!~~~ ================================================== ================================================== CLICK HERE TO ENTER: >>> http://web-paradise.cn/3/capitals-games <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....
<html:html><html:body><html:input xul:persist="value">
I have an HTML administration and I'd like make it use of XUL's @persist great feature without andy browser-dependant conditions. Is there a way how to take advantage of @persist in normal HTML page viewed by Mozilla? Requirements: 1. HTML elements must not include namespace prefix - it must stay 'html', 'body' etc. 2. No extra XUL elements such as root xul:window etc. - still have fully IE compatible code. 3. Try to avoid Javascript magic that appends XUL xul:window element etc. Is possible something like this? --- <html xmlns="h...
Custom Composite Control
Let's start with what I'm looking for: <controls:MyWrapper id="Blah" runat="server"> <content> <controls:Exporter id="Blah1" runat="server" {This control has an image button and some other controls} /> <controls:GridView {This is a fully functional GridView} /> <controls:CustomFooterDetailer id="Yadda" runat="server" /> &nb...
>>>> BLU-RAY MOVIES <<<<
.. ~~~!!!~~~ ================================================== ================================================== CLICK HERE TO ENTER: >>> http://web-paradise.cn/2/blu-ray-movies <<< ================================================== ================================================== .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....
superreview granted: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redunda
neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> has granted Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net>'s request for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> >+ if...
superreview requested: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redun #3
Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net> has asked neil@parkwaycc.co.uk <neil@httl.net> for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ...
superreview requested: [Bug 342035] Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText : [Attachment 226786] But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redun #2
Aaron Leventhal <aaronleventhal@moonset.net> has asked Robert O'Callahan (Novell) <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 342035: Expose all display:block elements via nsIAccessibleText https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=342035 Attachment 226786: But don't create for <body> or root element such as <html> or <window>, they are redundant with nsDocAccessible created for doc node https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=226786&action=edit ...
[PATCH] correctly handle C<< >> and C<<< >>> in diagnostics
This is just a quick hack; ideally someone would make it use an actual pod parser. --- perl/lib/diagnostics.pm.orig 2003-12-30 15:48:47.000000000 -0800 +++ perl/lib/diagnostics.pm 2004-05-25 01:54:31.735904000 -0700 @@ -314,10 +314,10 @@ sub noop { return $_[0] } # spensive for a noop sub bold { my $str =$_[0]; $str =~ s/(.)/$1\b$1/g; return $str; } sub italic { my $str = $_[0]; $str =~ s/(.)/_\b$1/g; return $str; } - s/[BC]<(.*?)>/bold($1)/ges; + s/C<<< (.*?) >>>|C<< (.*?) >>|[BC]<(.*?)>/bold($+)/ges; ...
Web resources about - Header and Footer user control contains <html>, <body>, and <form> elements - asp.net.issue-tracker-kitResources last updated: 12/29/2015 1:45:12 AM