Installed VS.NET 2002. That installed 1.0, but I HAD 1.1 installed. How to remove 1.0?
I haven't seen this anywhere, so I figured I would add it here. First of all, it is incorrect to recommend to anyone that who has VS.NET 2002 to do ANYTHING but first install VS.NET 2002. The installl order for VS.NET 2002 and .Net Framwork 1.1 SHOULD BE:
0. Install ALL windows updates for your pc EXCEPT FOR .NET Framwork 1.1
1. Install VS.NET 2002
2. Install MSDE that comes w/VS.NET 2002 (USE A NAMED INSTANCE! Never usee the default instance)
2. Install MDAC 2.8
3. Install .Net Framework 1.1
4. SOMEHOW GET RID OF .NET Framework and get VS.NET and IIS 5.x to work w...
superreview requested: [Bug 283181] installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175188] Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org> has asked Ben Goodger <bugs@bengoodger.com>
for superreview:
Bug 283181: installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283181
Attachment 175188: Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175188&action=edit
...
superreview granted: [Bug 283181] installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175188] Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6Ben Goodger <bugs@bengoodger.com> has granted Chase Phillips
<cmp@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview:
Bug 283181: installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283181
Attachment 175188: Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175188&action=edit
...
superreview granted: [Bug 283224] mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175211] Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org> has granted Chase Phillips
<cmp@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview:
Bug 283224: mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283224
Attachment 175211: Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175211&action=edit
------- Additional Comments from Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org>
thanks chase
...
superreview requested: [Bug 283224] mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175211] Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org> has asked Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org>
for superreview:
Bug 283224: mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283224
Attachment 175211: Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175211&action=edit
...
installing .net 1.1 framework after .net 2.0 framework has already been installed
I am configuring my server 2003 (standard edition) to host a service application that will be accessed with mobile devices. The requirement for the mobile licenses to work properly is that I install the 1.1 framework. I downloaded the redistributable file and went to install it and was prompted, "The product you are trying to install has already been installed with your operating system. Use Windows update to install the latest updates."
Through the "add/remove programs" window there is no indication the .net 1.1 framework is installed. When I navigate to C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft .NET...
Install 1.0 and 1.1 side-by-side and use the 1.1 csc to compile a 1.0
Hi,
I have the following (tricky) questions:
1. Can I install the 1.0 and 1.1 .NET Framework side-by-side with NO drawbacks on MY PC where I develop the .NET applications? (I do NOT use VS.NET)
2. After installing the 1.1 version, am I STILL ABLE to compile a 1.0 version, since our
production web-server still runs on 1.0 (our development web-server was upgraded to 1.1) ??
thx
Eau
.... as long as you compile DLLs with the right csc.exe/vbc.exe from 1.0 or 1.1
Free ASP.NET Version Switcher may interest you.DNN skins ForumTressleworks modulesDNN & webhostingIEWCtrls...
Can I install dot net framework 2 if 1.1 is already installed?
I notice my development laptop has dot net Framework (presume 1.0) and dot net Framework 1.1 installed.
I'd like to start gettting familiar with dot net Framework 2. Can I add this in or do I need to uninstall the 1.x versions first?
I presume that my previous dot net framework 1.x apps will still function if I install dot net Framework 2. Is this the case?
Thanks,
For sure you can have both on one machine.
Just install the .NET framework 2.0, then you will have an additional
tab in the IIS MMC, which allows you to specify the framework
each application would under.
Regards
...
how to install .ner framework 1.1 after .net framework 2.0 has been installed?
hello everyone!I got a problem, I have installed .net framework 2.0 in my computer, but now I need to install .net framework 1.1.The install process of .net framework 1.1 halt when it is stoping the IIS Admin.Can I install .net framework 1.1 after .net framework 2.0 has been installed?Or I have to remove 2.0 and install 1.1 and 2.0 in sequence?Thank you very much!
There is no sequence in .net framework 1.1 and 2.0 installation.You can look into the installation log and check what's the problem.Can you post your installation errors?Maybe I can help you to fix the error through your...
can't install kernel-desktop-3.1.9-1.4.1.x86_64 in opensuse 12.1
Good day eveyone:
Long story short, after running "zypper update"command, there's a
particular update called kernel-desktop-3.1.9-1.4.1.x86_64 which for
some strange reason won't install. All other updates install without
hiccups, but this particular one has the following output:
> Retrieving: kernel-desktop-3.1.9-1.4.1.x86_64.rpm [done (731.3 KiB/s)]
> Digest verification failed for kernel-desktop-3.1.9-1.4.1.x86_64.rpm.
> Expected
> 34158356c78aa4fd42d74d4aea850d8f15a6bd0d5f5e765e703ff211eca9ad66, found
> fd5a5fee9eca8a89317d3cce413a486c3d717e6...
Installation of both .net framework 1.0 & 1.1
I've already installed .net Visual Studio 2002 into my server and by installing this it was also installed 1.0 .net framework SDK into my server I have already download the .net framework 1.1 not the SDK pack and installed it to my server.And my problem is that when I'm trying to open an ASP page to my server which have to do with database let's say MS ACCESS database it bring me this error:
The page cannot be displayed
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Installation of both .net framework 1.0 & 1.1
I've already installed .net Visual Studio 2002 into my server and by installing this it was also installed 1.0 .net framework SDK into my server I have already download the .net framework 1.1 not the SDK pack and installed it to my server.And my problem is that when I'm trying to open an ASP page to my server which have to do with database let's say MS ACCESS database it bring me this error:
The page cannot be displayed
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------...
Version 1.1.1 Hosed on InstallName: handily
Email: handily1athotmaildotcom
Product: SeaMonkey
Summary: Version 1.1.1 Hosed on Install
Comments:
I tried to update to the latest ver 1.1.1. It did not install, kept
getting 239 chrome error. Did an uninstall, looked up solution on
mozilla.org for chrome error. Tried everything-nothing works. Did a
system restore using xppro. Still nothing works, even the previous version.
You had a perfectly good working program till this update. I do not
believe you were ready to release it.
How do I completely remove any and all references to SeaMonkey on my
system? I wou...
Never done upgrade before. Have a 2.1.2 site w/many custom (purchased) modules, some of which are no longer supported. Don't see *any* info in 3.1 install docs for 2.1.2 upgrade?
Hey folks:
I'm about to try something very scary, and I've spent the last 5 or so
hours reading DNN 3.1 docs and doing searches here (sure which the
search worked better, like allowed sort by date??). Anyway, I
don't see *any* info on updating a 2.1.2 site to a 3.1 site. The
only examples all have machine key stuff and other stuff that's not an
issue (or is it?) w/2.1.2
Here's the situation:
1 I have localhost access to the site via remote desktop
2. I have disconnected backed up data and log files and reconnected
3. I have made a copy of the virtual folder.
No...