VB 5.0-based ActiveX control in PB 6.0 (build 189)Has anyone had luck using a VB 5.0-generated ActiveX control into a PB 6.0
(build 189) window? Even simple VB-based ActiveX controls (e.g., a label
control) choke, even when simply being placed on a window (error hex
80004005). Same problem when the window is opened from the library
painter. When the window runs, I get a PB run-time error 445 (object
doesn't support this action), even though my PB app makes NO calls to the
ActiveX.
Any ideas?
thanks,
nurk.
--
Tom Nurkkala, PhD
tom.nurkkala@powercerv.com
...
migrating from pb 5.0 -> pb 6.0/6.5 any potholeI am looking for any know potholes to avoid in migrating several PB 5.0
application to PB 6.0/6.5
using an Oracle 7.3 data base on Win 95 client?
Thanks
Brian,
Take a look at http://techinfo.sybase.com/css/techinfo.nsf/DocID/ID=47787
Also, do your own search on 'mirgrating' and you should come up with a few
other references.
Frank
Brian Scanlon wrote in message
<01be37fa$0aa527a0$4e4b8282@bscanlon.cdphp.com>...
>I am looking for any know potholes to avoid in migrating several PB 5.0
>application to PB 6.0/6.5
>using an Oracle 7.3 data base on Win ...
Bugfixes for PB 6.0? Back from 6.0 to 5.0?Hi there,
since there are so many troubles with PB 6.0, does anyone know if there
are any bugfixes for PB 6.0 out yet or even planned for the NEAR future?
Is there a way to migrate back from PB 6.0 to PB 5.0.0x?
Regards,
* gerald *
You sound pretty upset - if you don't mind me asking what are these troubles
you are having?
Gerald Znidaric wrote in message <34C86F5A.778A0197@mgm-edv.de>...
>Hi there,
>
>since there are so many troubles with PB 6.0, does anyone know if there
>are any bugfixes for PB 6.0 out yet or even planned for the NEAR future?
...
PB 7.0 or PB 6.5 or PB 6.0 or PB5.04We are using PB 5.04 Enterprise at this moment and are almost happy (uch)
with it.
Because we don't programming applications for the Internet (maybe in the
near future) we haven't upgraded to version 6.0 and 6.5. Now we are confused
what to do, keeping the old and 'stable' version (5.04) or upgrading to a
newer version. Are there features in the newer versions wich make it a
'must' to upgrade. What are this features. Or are there reasons to stay on
5.04 (buggy newer versions?).
What is doing the rest of the Powerbuilder world???
Greetings,
Hans Groeneveld
...
Can PB 5.0, 6.0, and 6.5 CoexistI currently support a couple of PB5.0 applications and I am looking to
upgrade them to PB 6 or 6.5. I read the 6.5 documentation that said you
need to remove all previous versions of PB before installing. I would
like to have 5.0 and 6.0 or 6.5 coexist so that I can still support the
old application while I work the 6.5 to learn and study the upgrade.
So, can they co-exist and what problems might I run into?
Thanks , Doug
I have PB5 16-bit, (5.03), PB5 32-bit (PB5.04), PB6.5 and PB7 on the
same machine - They live in different worlds. Make sure you keep backups
of code and main...
Running PB 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 on same PCI am attempting to run PowerBuilder 3, 4, 5 (both 16 and 32 bit), and 6
on the same PC. I know that sounds crazy but all of those releases are
still in use at my company.
The only problem I am having is I can't get 6.0 to use its own pb.ini
file. I am running NT 4.0 and have made the following entries in my
WIN.INI in the [Powerbuilder] section: INITPATH=c:\...... statement
for PB3, INITPATH040 for PB4, INITPATH050 for PB5, and INITPATH060 for
PB6. This method works for PB3, 4, and 5 but not 6. PB6 seems to be
using the INITPATH statement but ignores the INITPATH060 statement. M...
PB 5.0 to PB 6.5, 7.x, 8.0??I have a client who needs to move from an initial PB 5.0 release (no patches
applied) to a newer version of PB. This is a small internal application but
they would like to open it up via the internet in the future. They are
currently running on a SQL Anywhere DB but would be looking to change that
also.
I don't have any hands on experience with PB 7.x but from what I heard and
read it hasn't been that great. I've been using PB 6.5 since build 444 and
was thinking of recommending that they make the move to 6.5 first and then
wait for PB 8.0 later this year.
Any thoug...
Connection of PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0 & Version B/W PB 6.0 and PB 7.0Can anyone tell me about connecting PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0. Please
remember we are not planning to upgrade both software. When I was trying to
connect PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0, error occurred " SQLSTAT 1003".
OS=NT 4.0 Server
PB=6.0 Enterprise Edition
SQL SERVER=7.0 Corporate Edition
I also want to know the versions between PB 6.0 to PB 7.0
If your are using the ODBC, which I assume you are, include Disablebind=1 in
your DBParm. If your deployment environment is also NT, you will have to
turn SQLSPY=1 using PFC services. Autocommit=FALSE and SetTransObject()
ra...
Help me about connecting PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0 & Versions B/W PB 6.0 and PB 7.0Can anyone tell me about connecting PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0. Please
remember we are not planning to upgrade both software. When I was trying to
connect PB 6.0 to SQL Server 7.0, error occurred " SQLSTAT 1003".
OS=NT 4.0 Server
PB=6.0 Enterprise Edition
SQL SERVER=7.0 Corporate Edition
I also want to know the versions between PB 6.0 to PB 7.0
I don't believe this is going to be possible without at least upgrading to the
latest maintenance release of 6.x.
On Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:59:56 -0700,
in powersoft.public.powerbuilder.database
Abdul Lateef <abdul_lat...
Netware 5.0+Groupwise 6.0 -->> Netware 6.0+Groupwise 6.5Hi.
We've got a Netware 5.0 server running Groupwise 6.0 and we would like
to
upgrade it to Netware 6.0 with Groupwise 6.5. What's the safest way of
doing this? We've got a spare server where we can dump things
temporarily.
Should we upgrade Groupwise first or Netware?
Thanks...
Scott Le Brun
Computer Operations Co-ordinator
Mount Scopus Memorial College
slebrun@no-spam.scopus.vic.edu.au:
> Should we upgrade Groupwise first or Netware?
Personally, I'd upgrade Netware first, make sure GW works in it's
current config and then upgrade GW....
Upgrading 4.0 to 5.0 then 6.0 or go straight to 6.0Hi All,
I think the subject speaks for itself
Thanks in advance
Mustafa
You should have no trouble going straight to 6 from 4. Once you do this, go
back and get rid of the obsolete function calls.
--
Regards,
Millard[TeamPowersoft]
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
mf3@gatesys.com
Co-Author of
PowerBuilder 5.0: Object Oriented Design and Development
McGraw-Hill, ISBN 0-07-024469-3
Co-Author of
PFC Professional Reference (Block, Brown, Gasin, Green & Tauber)
McGraw-Hill, 0-07-913267-7
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+...
pb 6.5, pb 7.0, pb 8.0 and future releasesI have designed an app using PB 6.5.1 and feel quite confortable to write
another app using this version of Power Buulder. I am aware that there have
been many other releases after this but have heard many developers complain
about not being stable and so forth. I can't say how true this is cause I
never bothered to update to later releases. I recently got a contract for a
new app and quite likely will be using Power Biulder but I am wondering if
am cheating myself by not trying to upgrade myself to a later release of
Power Biulder.
Thanks.
Charlie.
Charlie
You...
Firefox 2.0.0.6 Reverts back to 2.0.0.5 reinstalls 2.0.0.6, wipes out user settingsFirefox is turning into a piece of crap.
First, there is only 1 profile, the default profile.
Second, after the first 2.0.0.6 update wiped out the profile settings
(again), the automatic check for updates was turned off.
This morning the customized profile settings went MIA again, Firefox
decided it was version 2.0.0.5 (per the help, about firefox) and
automatically downloaded 2.0.0.6; even though 2.0.0.6 had already been
installed on July 31.
It now thinks it is 2.0.0.6, the home page and other profile settings
have been reset, and automatic updates turned off for everyt...
Running PB 6.0 and PB 5.0 on Same MachineI would like to start reviewing PB 6.0. Will there be problems if I load
on the machine I used for PB 5.0 development? Any tricks or warnings I
should know about?
>I would like to start reviewing PB 6.0. Will there be problems if I load
>on the machine I used for PB 5.0 development? Any tricks or warnings I
>should know about?
>
I haven't seen any problems. The files are all named differently, so
there should be no problem.
Larry Cermak [Team Powersoft] | Moderator forums.powersoft.com.database
Branick Consulting,Inc. | Moderator forums.powersoft.com.pow...