ASE 18.104.22.168 / SWR 8775 UPGRADE TO ASE 22.214.171.124/EBF 10628 PERFORMANCE PROBLEM
We recently upgraded ASE 126.96.36.199/SWR 8775 to ASE 188.8.131.52/EBF 10628.
Some queries stopped returning resultsets. Recompiled the stored procs which
fixed the issue.
But the queries are running slower now. The overall performance of the app
has become sluggish.
The CPU is generally running higher as well!
Have also set LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 to include the new Solaris 8 threads
Anybody any insights into this? How can we get back to the pre-upgrade
performance levels short of rolling back the EBF.
I guess 184.108.40.206 requires some Solaris ...Upgrade from ASE 220.127.116.11 to ASE 12.5.1
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I've just upgraded from ASE 18.104.22.168 to ASE 12.5.1. I tried
to start the server, but it won't startup.
Here is the message:
sybase(ASE1250)328 /app/sybase/ASE-12_5/install -->
startserver -f RUN_AMXDB
sybase(ASE1250)329 /app/sybase/ASE-12_5/install -->
00:00000:00000:2004/01/05 21:37:44.10 kernel Use license
00:00000:00000:2004/01/05 21:37:44.10 ker...A Possible fix for Suse 8.0 and ASE 22.214.171.124 (upgrade from 126.96.36.199)
Hi All, I had a similar problem to what a lot of you were experiencing...
with regards to glibc issues with ASE and Suse 8.0, and the server not
After a lot of reading up, and running stack traces, and various other
things to try and get my ASE 188.8.131.52 esd#2 upgraded to 184.108.40.206 esd#1 (and
of course ready for when 220.127.116.11 comes out),
I came to the conclusion that the 2.2.5-55 and 2.2.5-158 were both not
suitable for running 18.104.22.168 (my 22.214.171.124 worked well tho).
I found the following article from SuSe...
ftp://ftp.is.co.za/linux/distributions/suse/8.0/unsorted...Upgrading from ASE (32-bit) 126.96.36.199 on Solaris 2.8 64-bit to ASE(64-bit) 12.5.1 on Solaris 64-bit
We are planning to upgrade our ASE servers from a 32-bit ASE 188.8.131.52 to
64-bit ASE 12.5.1 on Solaris 8. Could you please give what are the steps to
be taken care and how do I start with ( Do I have to first upgrade to
32-bit12.5.1 and then upgrade to 64-bit ASE 12.5.1, or directly upgrade from
32-bit 184.108.40.206 to 64-bit 12.5.1 ?).
Could you also please point to some documentation (about upgrading 32-bit
220.127.116.11 to 64-bit 12.5.1).
...Upgrading from ASE 12.0 to ASE 12.5.2
I am basically thinking of upgrading ASE 12.0.x to ASE 12.5.2.
How would the migration process be. Is it straight dump and load or
> Hi everyone,
> I am basically thinking of upgrading ASE 12.0.x to ASE 12.5.2.
> How would the migration process be. Is it straight dump and load or
> otherwise ??
see the upgrade/installation guide
Senior Consultant Sybase Professional Services
New address per 21 November 2005:
Zo...ASE 18.104.22.168 to ASE 12.5.4 upgrade path
I would like to know if the migration from ASE 22.214.171.124 to
12.5.4 a direct migration or is there an intermediate
upgrade to be performed in between?
Take a look at the release bulletins and installation guides for your
platform. These are the first steps to any upgrade.
<passerby> wrote in message news:firstname.lastname@example.org...
>I would like to know if the migration from ASE 126.96.36.199 to
> 12.5.4 a direct migration or is there an intermediate
> upgrade to be performed in between?
...Can't construct query plan in ASE 12.0
Error 325 is being returned when trying to execute a stored procedure on
Adaptive Server Enterprise/12.0/P/SWR 8773 ESD 1/RS6000/AIX
4.3.2/1580/64bit/FBO/Tue Dec 7 03:29:32 1999 ...
this is the code causing the error when running on version listed above...
it's a sub-query within a stored proc
AND SBSB.HIST_ROW_ID = (select
SBSB2.SBSB_CK = SBSB.SBSB_CK
AND CONVERT(CHAR(10),SBEL.SBEL_INSQ_DT,101) = CONVERT(CHAR
When executing same stored procedure on AS...Performance Degradation after ASE 12.0 upgrade to ASE 12.5
There was a issue posted on 08/06/2002 by 'Bob' related to performance
degradation after upgrade of ASE 11.9.2 to ASE 12.5. I would like to know
whether anyone has found any solution/workaround
to resolve those issues without making any changes in the application code.
We are also facing the same problems here after upgrade of ASE 12.0 to ASE
12.5. The program which takes 10 mins. on ASE 12.0 is taking more than 3
hrs to finish on ASE 12.5 despite of using the same indexes and the program
which takes 3 hrs on ASE 12.0 is taking more than 24 hours on ASE 12.5. ...Migration from ASE-64 bits 188.8.131.52 to ASE 64 bits 12.5.3 for AIX 5.3
Here there someone to indicate me the road tasks in order to
migrate an ASE 184.108.40.206 to ASE 12.5.3 on unix 5.3 ? (64
> Here there someone to indicate me the road tasks in order to
> migrate an ASE 220.127.116.11 to ASE 12.5.3 on unix 5.3 ? (64
> Thank you
Apply 12.5.2 IR then 12.5.3 esd 5.
Jason L. Froebe
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 07:18:22 -0800, kamel wrote:
> Here there someone to indicate me the road tasks in order to migrate an
> ASE 18.104.22.168 ...Migrating from ASE 12.0 32-bit to ASE 12.0 64-bit
Has anyone run into any problems migrating from 32-bit to 64-bit?
...Migrating from ASE 12.0 32-bit to ASE 12.0 64-bit
Has anyone run into any problems migrating from 32-bit to 64-bit?
...Migration from ASE 12.0 ( HPUX ) to ASE 12.5 ( Solaris 8 )
I'd like to migrate an ASE 22.214.171.124 (roman8) on HPUX 11 with many DBs
to an ASE 126.96.36.199 (*roman8*) on Solaris 8. I know it's not the default charset on solaris.
I've made dump on HPUX, copy it on Sun box and load it. I know it's not supported by Sybase ( cross plateform dump ).
However, it seems to be OK, the upgrade works well, the dbcc (check table, alloc) did not reveal error. I think it's not
supported only because the charset deffers ( by default ) on the plateform.
What do you think of this ? is there others checks to do ?
What kind of corruption or...SQLRemote Problem with 7.0.2-1 and 6.0.2-1 on Linux [ASE 11.9.2-3 and ASE 12.5 eval]
I got the following problems using sql-remote.
on ASE 12.5 eval:
I got the following RPMs installed on RedHat Linux 7.2 - Kernel 2.4.17 -
After the execution of ssxtract or ssremote I got an error like:
../ssxtract: /opt/sybase-12.5/SQLRemote/lib/libsstasks7_r.so: version
`libdbtasks7_r.so' not found (required by ./ssxtract)
The file libsstasks7_r.so exists and the path is correctly specified in
There'...ASE 12.5.2 to ASE 188.8.131.52
I have to return to ASE 184.108.40.206 from ASE 12.5.2.
I created a new server and did a dump/load of a user database and
that seems to be fine.
Is this a safe way to downgrade ?
Is it necessary to create a new server (master database) or should it
also be possible to shutdown the 12.5.2 server and start it again with
the 220.127.116.11 binary ?