eDir 8.8 or 8.8.1

--____PFHXATGSAXOEYDMZASIM____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Fri, 2 Nov 2006 04:58:20
	-0600"

Hello all,

I always seem to not get this right.  I am always confused about what =
means what.  I think it changes too much.

Is eDir 8.8.1 really eDir 8.8 sp1 or is there an 8.8.1?

I have 8.8 sp1 and am wondering if I need to upgrade to 8.8.1?

Tom
--____PFHXATGSAXOEYDMZASIM____
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="____IHFBHLEKCBLIDCAIXTDG____"


--____IHFBHLEKCBLIDCAIXTDG____
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Fri, 2 Nov 2006 04:58:20
	-0600"

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-15=
">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV>Hello all,</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I always seem to not get this right.&nbsp; I am always confused about =
what means what.&nbsp; I think it changes too much.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Is eDir 8.8.1 really eDir 8.8 sp1 or is there an 8.8.1?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>I have 8.8 sp1 and am wondering if I need to upgrade to 8.8.1?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
--____IHFBHLEKCBLIDCAIXTDG____--

--____PFHXATGSAXOEYDMZASIM____--
0
Tom
11/2/2006 4:58:20 PM
novell.edirectory.netware 7858 articles. 0 followers. Follow

9 Replies
1020 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 2

8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.

Jim

-- 
 Jim Henderson, CNA6, CDE, CNI, LPIC-1
 Novell Training Services

0
Jim
11/2/2006 5:22:13 PM
--____QKMDSEVYVKEACCMYWDDB____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Fri, 2 Nov 2006 05:30:20
	-0600"

I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  One =
labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.

Thanks Jim.

Tom


>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.

Jim

--=20
Jim Henderson, CNA6, CDE, CNI, LPIC-1
Novell Training Services
--____QKMDSEVYVKEACCMYWDDB____
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="____VOUIAUPRMEVEZOQABYPX____"


--____VOUIAUPRMEVEZOQABYPX____
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Fri, 2 Nov 2006 05:30:20
	-0600"

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-15=
">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV>I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the =
updates.&nbsp; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 =
sp1.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Thanks Jim.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; =
11/2/2006 11:22 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe =
what's different is that engineering made<BR>8.8.1 directly installable as =
well as upgradable from 8.8.<BR><BR>Jim<BR><BR>-- <BR>Jim Henderson, CNA6, =
CDE, CNI, LPIC-1<BR>Novell Training Services<BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></=
HTML>
--____VOUIAUPRMEVEZOQABYPX____--

--____QKMDSEVYVKEACCMYWDDB____--
0
Tom
11/2/2006 5:30:20 PM
Glad to help out, Tom. :-)

Jim

-- 
 Jim Henderson, CNA6, CDE, CNI, LPIC-1
 Novell Training Services

0
Jim
11/2/2006 6:30:11 PM
Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:

> I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.
> 
> Thanks Jim.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
>>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
> 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
> 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.
> 
> Jim

0
Jeff
11/2/2006 9:42:38 PM
--____ZTKCPRFGBHSKOVASVHOO____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Sat, 3 Nov 2006 03:06:07
	-0600"

Is that the new patch that came out last month?

>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/2/2006 3:42 PM >>>
Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.

On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:

> I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  =
One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.
>=20
> Thanks Jim.
>=20
> Tom
>=20
>=20
>>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
> 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
> 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.
>=20
> Jim
--____ZTKCPRFGBHSKOVASVHOO____
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="____ISXFFALNNXMHBKUDOCNC____"


--____ISXFFALNNXMHBKUDOCNC____
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Sat, 3 Nov 2006 03:06:07
	-0600"

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-15=
">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">Is that the new =
patch that came out last month?<BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijef=
fREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>Also you best =
be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR><BR>On =
Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; I thought =
so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbsp; One =
labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;=
&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM =
&gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is =
that engineering made<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as =
upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Jim<BR><BR><BR><BR></BODY></HTML>
--____ISXFFALNNXMHBKUDOCNC____--

--____ZTKCPRFGBHSKOVASVHOO____--
0
Tom
11/3/2006 3:06:08 PM
SS203 is only like a week old. In production I run 8.8.1+ss203+FTF1.

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:06:08 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:

> Is that the new patch that came out last month?
> 
>>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/2/2006 3:42 PM >>>
> Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.
> 
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:
> 
>> I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.
>> 
>> Thanks Jim.
>> 
>> Tom
>> 
>> 
>>>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
>> 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
>> 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.
>> 
>> Jim<HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">Is that the new patch that came out last month?<BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR><BR>On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbsp; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering made<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Jim<BR><BR><BR><BR></BODY></HTML>

0
Jeff
11/4/2006 12:13:18 AM
--____IFZVISTVJPEORKKAMVST____
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Sat, 3 Nov 2006 12:58:25
	-0600"

where can I find ss203?  I did all kinds of searches and they must be =
hidden.

Tom


>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/3/2006 6:13 PM >>>
SS203 is only like a week old. In production I run 8.8.1+ss203+FTF1.

On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:06:08 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:

> Is that the new patch that came out last month?
>=20
>>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/2/2006 3:42 PM >>>
> Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running =
881.
>=20
> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:
>=20
>> I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  =
One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.
>>=20
>> Thanks Jim.
>>=20
>> Tom
>>=20
>>=20
>>>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
>> 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
>> 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.
>>=20
>> Jim<HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-=
15">
> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">Is that the new =
patch that came out last month?<BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijef=
fREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>Also you best =
be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR><BR>On =
Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; I thought =
so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbsp; One =
labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt; =
<BR>&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;=
&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM =
&gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is =
that engineering made<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as =
upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Jim<BR><BR><BR><BR></BODY></HTML>
--____IFZVISTVJPEORKKAMVST____
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="____XDXAKNPIKHBMNSILBINZ____"


--____XDXAKNPIKHBMNSILBINZ____
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; modification-date="Sat, 3 Nov 2006 12:58:25
	-0600"

<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-15=
">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.2759" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
<DIV>where can I find ss203?&nbsp; I did all kinds of searches and they =
must be hidden.</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Tom</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; =
11/3/2006 6:13 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>SS203 is only like a week old. In =
production I run 8.8.1+ss203+FTF1.<BR><BR>On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:06:08 =
+0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; Is that the new patch that came out =
last month?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS=
@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; Also you best be =
running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; =
On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt=
; I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbs=
p; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt;=
&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; Tom<BR>&gt;&gt; =
<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps=
..NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 =
SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering made<BR>&gt;&gt; =
8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt;&gt; =
<BR>&gt;&gt; Jim&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;<BR>&gt; &lt;META http-equiv=3DCont=
ent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-15"&gt;<BR>&gt; &lt;META =
content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;<BR>&gt;=
 &lt;BODY style=3D"MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma"&gt;Is that the =
new patch that came out last month?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp=
;gt; Jeff Johnson&amp;lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&amp;gt; 11/2/2006 =
3:42 PM &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;Also you best be running SS202 =
or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;On Thu, 02 =
Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; I =
thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&amp;nbs=
p; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&amp;nbsp; Both contain 8.8 =
sp1.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Thanks Jim.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; =
&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Tom&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;=
gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Jim Henderson&amp;lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&a=
mp;gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; 8.8.1 =
is 8.8 SP1.&amp;nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering =
made&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable =
from 8.8.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Jim&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B=
R&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;<BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTM=
L>
--____XDXAKNPIKHBMNSILBINZ____--

--____IFZVISTVJPEORKKAMVST____--
0
Tom
11/4/2006 12:58:27 AM
download.novell.com

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:58:27 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:

> where can I find ss203?  I did all kinds of searches and they must be hidden.
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
>>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/3/2006 6:13 PM >>>
> SS203 is only like a week old. In production I run 8.8.1+ss203+FTF1.
> 
> On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:06:08 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:
> 
>> Is that the new patch that came out last month?
>> 
>>>>> Jeff Johnson<jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com> 11/2/2006 3:42 PM >>>
>> Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.
>> 
>> On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:
>> 
>>> I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.  One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.  Both contain 8.8 sp1.
>>> 
>>> Thanks Jim.
>>> 
>>> Tom
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>>> Jim Henderson<Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC> 11/2/2006 11:22 AM >>>
>>> 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.  I believe what's different is that engineering made
>>> 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.
>>> 
>>> Jim<HTML><HEAD>
>> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
>> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
>> <BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">Is that the new patch that came out last month?<BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR><BR>On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbsp; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Tom<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering made<BR>&gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; Jim<BR><BR><BR><BR></BODY></HTML><HTML><HEAD>
> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15">
> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.3790.2759" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
> <BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma">
> <DIV>where can I find ss203?&nbsp; I did all kinds of searches and they must be hidden.</DIV>
> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
> <DIV>Tom</DIV>
> <DIV><BR><BR>&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/3/2006 6:13 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>SS203 is only like a week old. In production I run 8.8.1+ss203+FTF1.<BR><BR>On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:06:08 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR><BR>&gt; Is that the new patch that came out last month?<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jeff Johnson&lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt; Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt; On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:<BR>&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&nbsp; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; Thanks Jim.<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; Tom<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Jim Henderson&lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &gt;&gt;&gt;<BR>&gt;&gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering made<BR>&gt;&gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.<BR>&gt;&gt; <BR>&gt;&gt; Jim&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;<BR>&gt; &lt;META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-15"&gt;<BR>&gt; &lt;META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=GENERATOR&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;<BR>&gt; &lt;BODY style="MARGIN: 4px 4px 1px; FONT: 10pt Tahoma"&gt;Is that the new patch that came out last month?&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Jeff Johnson&amp;lt;jedijeffREMOVETHIS@gmail.com&amp;gt; 11/2/2006 3:42 PM &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;Also you best be running SS202 or SS203(needs FTF) if you are running 881.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;On Thu, 02 Nov 2006 17:30:20 +0000, Tom Hafemann wrote:&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; I thought so, but as I was looking, I saw two folders in the updates.&amp;nbsp; One labeled 8.8 and the other 8.8.1.&amp;nbsp; Both contain 8.8 sp1.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Thanks Jim.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Tom&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Jim Henderson&amp;lt;Jim.Henderson@SysOps.NSC&amp;gt; 11/2/2006 11:22 AM &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; 8.8.1 is 8.8 SP1.&amp;nbsp; I believe what's different is that engineering made&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; 8.8.1 directly installable as well as upgradable from 8.8.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; &lt;BR&gt;&amp;gt; Jim&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;<BR><BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>

0
Jeff
11/4/2006 2:54:15 AM
Tom Hafemann wrote:

> where can I find ss203?  I did all kinds of searches and they must be
> hidden.

It is not hidden but at a slightly different place. Security Services
can be downloaded through download.novell.com

http://download.novell.com/index.jsp?product_id=&search=Search&build_typ
e=SDBuildBean&families=2653&version=&date_range=&keywords=&x=23&y=14


-- 
Cheers,
Edward
0
Edward
11/4/2006 3:22:51 AM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

eDirectory 8.8.1 running linux coexist with eDir 8.8.1 running netware
Hi All, Can you have eDirectory 8.8.1 running on linux be part of the same tree running netware edirectory 8.8.1? Thanks, Steve In article <NmRkh.21228$jS4.17837@prv-forum2.provo.novell.com>, wrote: > Can you have eDirectory 8.8.1 running on linux be part of the same tree > running netware edirectory 8.8.1? > I don't see why not. Craig Johnson Novell Support Connection SysOp Of course. What triggers the question? Are you seeing anything that implies not? -- Andrew C Taubman Novell Support Forums Volunteer SysOp http://support.novell.com/...

eDir 8.8 vs 8.8.1
Is 8.8.1 a full blown install or a patch? Don -- D.Lohr Technical Services James Madison University ++ Bad command or file name ++ Either. You can intall it on 87x or 88. It is a full blown install. SS202 is a needed patch after 881 so be sure to get it. On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:27:49 +0000, D.Lohr wrote: > Is 8.8.1 a full blown install or a patch? > > Don Thanks a bunch for the info. Don :) Jeff Johnson wrote: > Either. You can intall it on 87x or 88. It is a full blown install. SS202 > is a needed patch after 881 so be sure to get it. > ...

Cannot upgrade eDirectory from 8.8.1 to 8.8.2
When upgrading the eDirectory on a single server tree, the nds-install fails with a "-2" error when trying to open the DIB. There are no errors in eDirectory NDSrepair before the upgrade. When the script reaches the point of opening the DIB, we get the following errors "inconsistent database -618" and the DIB refuses to open and cannot be repaired using NDSREPAIR. Does anyone know a TID or anything else on how to fix this issue. We are completely stuck as to what is causing the problem. -- JohnAtDET ---------------------------------------------------...

eDir 8.8 sp1 to 8.8 sp2
Running the upgrade from 8.8 sp1 to 8.8 sp2. I receive the following error message "unable to install novell-kerberos-ldap-extensions" the upgrade stops. -- jxn2083 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jxn2083 wrote: > > Running the upgrade from 8.8 sp1 to 8.8 sp2. I receive the following > error message "unable to install novell-kerberos-ldap-extensions" the > upgrade stops. any errors in /var/log/messages ? Not sure if there is a proper logfile for the upgrade process. -- Cheers, Edward ...

eDir 8.8.2 vs 8.8.3
I am on eDir 8.7.3.9 and is working on upgrading eDir to 8.8.2. Should I do 8.8.3 instead but it is very new. What is everyone's option? Wilson -- wilsonhandy ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8.8.3 is not out yet. 882 with the latest ftf is very stable. On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:06:01 +0000, wilsonhandy wrote: > I am on eDir 8.7.3.9 and is working on upgrading eDir to 8.8.2. Should I > > do 8.8.3 instead but it is very new. > > What is everyone's option? > > Wilson > > > >...

eDir 8.7.3.8 v. 8.8
Hello everyone. We're currently running eDir 8.7.3.7 on several NetWare 6.5 sp5 servers. What are the pros/cons of upgrading to eDir 8.8 vs. applying the 8.7.3.8 patch? Any compelling reason not to do the upgrade? Thanks, Travis Travis Montgomery, > What are the pros/cons of upgrading to eDir 8.8 vs. > applying the 8.7.3.8 patch? > Basically that so many apps have ptroblems with 8.8. It should really have been called 9.0. Lots of new features though. - Anders Gustafsson, Engineer, CNE6, ASE NSC Volunteer Sysop Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20) ...

Edirectory 8.8.2 & 8.8.4
I am getting ready to install my first OES2 SP1 SLES box. The documentation says edirectory needs to be at v8.8.4. All my Netware and OES boxes are running edirectory v 8.8.2. I have many netware boxes and want to know if I need to upgrade them all to edirectory v8.8.4 or can i upgrade them slowly? Basically, will Edirectory behave if some servers are running v8.8.2 and others are running v8.8.4? -- wanman ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The documentation says edirectory needs to be at v8.8.4. It does? Can you point us...

eDirectory 8.8.3 vs 8.8.4
Are there any extra features/functionality provided in 8.8.4 that aren't in 8.8.3? Is there a reason to go with one over the other? Or is the only difference in these versions their platform combatibility (OES2) ? -- thrabak ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 You don't really have a choice between the two.... if you are on OES 2 SP1 and maybe NW 6.5.8 you get 8.8.4... otherwise the highest you can use is 8.8.3. 8.8.5 will be available everywhere I believe so it will clear...

upgrade edir 8.7.3 to 8.8.2 or 8.8.3?
Our tree: Netware 6.5SP7 and OES2/Linux, edir 8.7.3.10b ftf1 and edir 8.8.SP2 ftf2 I started to install new servers with edir 8.8 some month ago, some of the edir 8.7.3 servers will be switched of before long. Now I want to upgrade the remaining 8.7.3 servers to 8.8. It seemed clear to me that I wouldn't install 8.8.2 if 8.8.3 is out. But after reading the postings here, I am quite unsure... My questions: Isn't it dangerous to stay at 8.8.2? Some of the fixed problems are overflows - these might be security relevant? I saw two problems with 8.8.3 here: the ldap probl...

Netware 6.5sp7 edir 8.8 sp2 --> 8.8 sp3 errors
Good Morning! On a tree with all netware 6.5sp7 boxes, I am getting the following error on all of the servers that had edir 8.8 sp2 installed. Any server that still had 8.7.x installed upgraded fine. During the install of edir 8.8.3, as nwconfig restarts with the nds8.ncf file (which follows) I get the errors listed below. nds8.ncf file ----------------- delay 3 # 9/18/2008 3:21:48 unload nwconfig # 9/18/2008 3:21:48 nwconfig b=SYS:\SYSTEM\NDS8TEMP\install\nls\4\nds8.ils s=SYS:\SYSTEM\NDS8TEMP d=C:\NWSERVER e=c:\error.log rf=sys:\_netware\response.rsp # 9/18/2008 ...

[IDM 3] eDir 8.7.3.8 or 8.8
Hello, I'm going to install a IDM 3 on SLSE 9 in a production environment to synchronize some systems. What is the best solution for the identity vault version , eDir 8.7.3.8 or eDir 8.8 ? This meta directory will be used only to consolidate some information that will be accessed with a web interface and will do some provisioning. Are there some known bugs with eDir8.8 ? R�mi. If you are ever going to want to go to 8.8 and above I would start with it. It probably isn't quite as stable as 8.7.3.8, but upgrading to 8.8 once IDM is installed is problematic and requires ...

Edir 8.73 and Edir 8.8 beside each other
Hello all, I have a question for you all. We are currently running a mixed enviroment 6.5 / 5.1 netware with Edir 8.7.3. We are planning to install a OES SP1 or 2 on Linux into the same tree wich has Edir 8.8 So my question is can these 2 Edir's run beside each other? -- TheSmoker TheSmoker wrote: > > Hello all, > > I have a question for you all. > > We are currently running a mixed enviroment 6.5 / 5.1 netware with > Edir 8.7.3. > > We are planning to install a OES SP1 or 2 on Linux into the same tree > wich has Edir 8...

8.8.4 vs 8.8.5
Should I or should I not? I have 24 NW65sp8 Edir 8.8.4 in my small school system. I see not only that 8.8.5 is out but also a FTF1 sp that looks to fix some serious issues. My question is this. Is 8.8.4 stable enough that I can wait or are their issues that I may not see yet that should push me towards upgrading as soon as possible. We also use the LDAP for authentication purposes for an Astaro firewall. The content filter for surfing allows us to have multiple profiles for allowed surfing. And based on who you are is what profile you get. This has been problematic in that we ...

How to upgrade from 8.8 SP4 to 8.8 SP5
I am running on one NW 6.5.8 server Version 20217.07 30 January 2009 I can only find 08 Oct 2010 - eDirectory 8.8 SP5 Patch5 for NetWare x86 but that one states: The server must be running eDirectory 8.8 Support Pack 5. The "DS.NLM" version should be "20219.15" or later. Seb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 True... patch to 8.8.5 before patching to 8.8.5.5. Go to download.novell.com, choose eDirectory from the drop-down, and look for the full 8.8.5 install for all platforms. Should be here: http://download.novell.com/Download?build...

Web resources about - eDir 8.8 or 8.8.1 - novell.edirectory.netware

Brazil's Edir Macedo: 'I Am the Richest Man in the World'
Edir Macedo has built an empire preaching faith as the path to prosperity. Brazilian prosecuters say Macedo's approach to wealth amounts to a ...

Brazilian Billionaire Bishop Edir Macedo Is Now A Banker, Too
One of the new additions to this year's FORBES Billionaires List, Edir Macedo, the founder and leader of the Universal Church of the Kingdom ...

Brazilian evangelical leader Bishop Edir Macedo charged with fraud - World news - The Guardian
Bishop Edir Macedo of the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God accused of siphoning off billions of dollars in donations

Twitter
Sign in Sign up You are on Mobile because you are using an old version of Internet Explorer. Learn more here Khadija Ismayilova @ Khadija0576 ...

Rede Globo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rede Globo ( Globe Network ), or simply Globo , is a Brazilian television network , launched by media mogul Roberto Marinho on April 26, 1965. ...

Mourning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mourning is, in the simplest sense, synonymous with grief over the death of someone. The word is also used to describe a cultural complex of ...

Caspian Group
Caspian Group Azerbaijan Caspian Invest Azerbaijan Caspian Marine Azerbaijan Caspian Events Azerbaijan

Ramiz Mehdiyev ABŞ-ı “rəngli inqilab” hazırlamaqda ittiham edir
Интернет ресурс CONTACT создан для получения доступа к оперативной информации об Азербайджане и в мире по экономике, политике, культуре, спорту ...

Gadabay - Discover Azerbaijan
This district is rich in black and white marble and iron reserves and used to be a summer pasture for surrounding villages. It was called “The ...

The AzerTimes - South and Norh Azerbaijan News
Bizi izlə Mugam Radio Socialize Facebook Twitter RSS Feed Ana səhifə Cənubi Azərbaycan Şimali Azərbaycan English Məqalələr About South Azerbaijan ...

Resources last updated: 12/9/2015 7:22:20 PM