Just a test #23

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------AB0B0760632FE2A8F8150DA6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Just another mundane test

X-Face: 
9H)zw+jS7DfSX{\qL9\L3'x)}S<7L&SUbj;&fTCUty@|kf:^MdSWG[R{>?2zJWz22 
CD^F8$veefA8!H:xjYhG}&]_7@js{<]D]9n#u_cX0TAp4


-- 

With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
satisfaction is higher than any previous version of windows.


--------------AB0B0760632FE2A8F8150DA6
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#008000" bgcolor="#faf0e6">
    <p>Just another mundane test</p>
    <p>X-Face:
9H)zw+jS7DfSX{\qL9\L3'x)}S&lt;7L&amp;SUbj;&amp;fTCUty@|kf:^MdSWG[R{&gt;?2zJWz2<dq>2
        CD^F8$veefA8!H:xjYhG}&amp;]_7@js{&lt;]D]9n#u_cX0TAp4</dq></p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      <div style="background-color: blue; color: yellow; font-weight:
        bolder; display: grid; align-items: center; justify-items:
        center; min-height: 80px; font-size: 1.2em; border-radius: 50px;
        ">
        <p>With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10,
          customer satisfaction is higher than any previo
0
UTF
11/14/2020 7:54:32 PM
mozilla.test 6808 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

3 Replies
13 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 35

On 11/14/20 9:54 AM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
> Just another mundane test
> 
> X-Face: 
> 9H)zw+jS7DfSX{\qL9\L3'x)}S<7L&SUbj;&fTCUty@|kf:^MdSWG[R{>?2zJWz22 
> CD^F8$veefA8!H:xjYhG}&]_7@js{<]D]9n#u_cX0TAp4
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
> satisfaction is higher than any previo
> 
i saw it but don't know what it is :(
0
raf
11/14/2020 8:43:25 PM
raf wrote on 15/11/20 07:43:
> On 11/14/20 9:54 AM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
>> Just another mundane test
>>
>> X-Face: 
>> 9H)zw+jS7DfSX{\qL9\L3'x)}S<7L&SUbj;&fTCUty@|kf:^MdSWG[R{>?2zJWz22 
>> CD^F8$veefA8!H:xjYhG}&]_7@js{<]D]9n#u_cX0TAp4
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
>> satisfaction is higher than any previo
>>
> i saw it but don't know what it is :(

and did that disappoint you, raf?? ;-P

Hmm!! That's interesting!! I was going to ask you, raf, why your TB 
didn't remove GG's sig file, ..... but, then, I remembered that 
HTML-composing has a problem which causes the sig-delimiter (Dash Dash 
Space) to be included WITH-IN the HTML envelope rather than at the start 
of the signature..... but, then, we're only supposed to be seeing the 
PLAIN TEXT portion of GG's post.

So why is the sig-delimiter for the PT portion still, apparently, 
with-in the HTML envelope that we're not supposed to be seeing??
-- 
Daniel

Win7 User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.5 Build identifier: 20190609032134

Linux User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) 
Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.49.1 Build identifier: 20171015235623
0
Daniel
11/15/2020 1:01:23 AM
On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 12:01:23 +1100 Daniel <dxmm@spam.albury.net.au> wrote:
> raf wrote on 15/11/20 07:43:
>> On 11/14/20 9:54 AM, 😉 Good Guy 😉 wrote:
>>> Just another mundane test
>>>
>>> X-Face: 
>>> 9H)zw+jS7DfSX{\qL9\L3'x)}S<7L&SUbj;&fTCUty@|kf:^MdSWG[R{>?2zJWz22 
>>> CD^F8$veefA8!H:xjYhG}&]_7@js{<]D]9n#u_cX0TAp4
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> With over 1.2 billion devices now running Windows 10, customer 
>>> satisfaction is higher than any previo
>>>
>> i saw it but don't know what it is :(
>
> and did that disappoint you, raf?? ;-P
>
> Hmm!! That's interesting!! I was going to ask you, raf, why your TB 
> didn't remove GG's sig file, ..... but, then, I remembered that 
> HTML-composing has a problem which causes the sig-delimiter (Dash Dash 
> Space) to be included WITH-IN the HTML envelope rather than at the start 
> of the signature..... but, then, we're only supposed to be seeing the 
> PLAIN TEXT portion of GG's post.
>
> So why is the sig-delimiter for the PT portion still, apparently, 
> with-in the HTML envelope that we're not supposed to be seeing??
disappointed? no i prefer slrn anyway. no pictures.^>^. 
0
raf
11/15/2020 10:49:25 PM
Reply: