Upgrading from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???

Hi all,

My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.

However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.

What is going on?

Regards,
alex

0
ozgwei
3/25/2007 11:41:00 PM
mozilla.support.firefox 24319 articles. 9 followers. Post Follow

17 Replies
1382 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 19

ozgwei@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
> 
> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
> 
> What is going on?
> 
> Regards,
> alex
> 

Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting 
messages about 2.0.0.2?

Lee

-- 
Leonidas Jones, Netscape/Mozilla Champion
The Champs: http://mozillachampions.ufaq.org
Links: http://www.ufaq.org/ http://mozilla.com http://kb.mozillazine.org
Posting Etiquette: http://www.mozilla.org/community/etiquette.html
0
Leonidas
3/26/2007 12:31:43 AM
> Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3
Yes. It's updated automatically, just as usual.

> and are not getting messages about 2.0.0.2?
What messages?

I should point out that the "About FireFox" still shows the version as
2.0.0.3:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/
20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3

0
ozgwei
3/26/2007 1:21:44 AM
On 25/03/2007 7:41 PM, _ozgwei@gmail.com_ spoke thusly:
> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
> 
> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
> 
> What is going on?

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
-- 
Chris Ilias <http://ilias.ca>
List-owner: support-firefox, support-thunderbird
mozilla.test.multimedia moderator
(Please do not email me tech support questions)
0
Chris
3/26/2007 5:27:22 AM
On 3/25/2007 4:31 PM Leonidas Jones opined:

> ozgwei@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
>> 
>> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
>> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
>> 
>> What is going on?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> alex
>> 
> 
> Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting 
> messages about 2.0.0.2?
> 
> Lee
> 
Lee, lets stretch a point here.
About 2 weeks or so ago, I whined here about  FF updating upon opening
w/o asking 1st
as my settings request.
I received no response to my post.  A day or so later, someone else
asked the same question and AFAICT
the only replies were a few "happened to me too" but no indication of
what the problem could be.
Maybe ozgwei is victim to the same anomaly but reversed.
Sometime /after/ he upgraded himself manually to 2.0.0.3, the mystery
updater worked its magic, again unrequested and reverted him
to 2.0.0.2.
Sounds plausable, illogical as it may seem.
Also sounds like a trip to bugzilla is in order, but I have a hard time
searching there...
0
goodwin
3/27/2007 2:36:37 PM
On 3/27/2007 6:36 AM goodwin opined:

> On 3/25/2007 4:31 PM Leonidas Jones opined:
> 
>> ozgwei@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
>>> 
>>> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
>>> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
>>> 
>>> What is going on?
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> alex
>>> 
>> 
>> Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting 
>> messages about 2.0.0.2?
>> 
>> Lee
>> 
> Lee, lets stretch a point here.
> About 2 weeks or so ago, I whined here about  FF updating upon opening
> w/o asking 1st
> as my settings request.
> I received no response to my post.  A day or so later, someone else
> asked the same question and AFAICT
> the only replies were a few "happened to me too" but no indication of
> what the problem could be.
> Maybe ozgwei is victim to the same anomaly but reversed.
> Sometime /after/ he upgraded himself manually to 2.0.0.3, the mystery
> updater worked its magic, again unrequested and reverted him
> to 2.0.0.2.
> Sounds plausable, illogical as it may seem.
> Also sounds like a trip to bugzilla is in order, but I have a hard time
> searching there...

Oops - just saw Chris' post - sounds like what OP was talking about.
But I didn't get a /report/ of an update - I got the update installed,
which can
be a bit more disconcerting.
0
goodwin
3/27/2007 2:51:28 PM
On 26.03.2007 00:41 UK Time, ozgwei@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
> 
> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
> 
> What is going on?

I never had an update problem before, but now I have the same problem as 
as the OP.

I read the link provided by Chris in his reply, but the problem does in 
fact appear to be worse than reported.

<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version> 
says "A bug can cause Firefox to report that updates are available even 
when none exist."

In my case the Software Update window says "Firefox has downloaded and 
verified an important update", despite the fact that I have set FF to 
ask me what to do!

This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF? =-O

-- 
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
0
Herb
3/27/2007 4:39:48 PM
Herb wrote:

> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF? =-O
> 

"https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"

0
Nir
3/27/2007 5:31:29 PM
Nir wrote:
> Herb wrote:
> 
>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
>> =-O
>> 
> 
> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
> 
and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
close firefox.
goto firefox program folder.
Delete active-update.xml, updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
start Firefox

0
Nir
3/27/2007 5:41:36 PM
On 27.03.2007 18:31 UK Time, Nir wrote:
> Herb wrote:
> 
>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF? =-O
>>
> 
> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
> 

Thanks for the link, although it refers to Firefox 2.0.0.1 auto-updating 
to 2.0.0.2

In my case it's 'updating' from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2 =-O

-- 
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
0
Herb
3/27/2007 9:42:40 PM
On 27.03.2007 18:41 UK Time, Nir wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> Herb wrote:
>>
>>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
>>> =-O
>>>
>>
>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>>
> and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
> and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
> close firefox.
> goto firefox program folder.
> Delete active-update.xml, updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
> start Firefox
> 

Thanks for your advice.

I haven't yet shut down FF since the message appeared.

Do you think the advice is still relevant, despite the fact that in my 
(and in the OP's case) the 'update' is from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2, not from 
2.0.0.1 to 2.0.0.2??

By the way, I'm surprised there aren't more complains about this recent 
update experience. How come only the OP and I appear to be affected by 
this specific situation?

Something to do with extensions, perhaps?

-- 
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
0
Herb
3/27/2007 9:47:26 PM
On 3/27/2007 10:41 AM, Nir wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> Herb wrote:
>>
>>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
>>> =-O
>>>
>>
>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>>
> and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
> and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
> close firefox.
> goto firefox program folder.
> Delete active-update.xml, updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
> start Firefox
> 


Thanks, Nir.......that solved the problem I was seeing with Firefox 
wanting to upgrade from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2.

Mack L.
0
Mack
3/27/2007 10:19:24 PM
On 27.03.2007 18:41 UK Time, Nir wrote:
> Nir wrote:
>> Herb wrote:
>>
>>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
>>> =-O
>>>
>>
>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>>
> and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
> and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
> close firefox.
> goto firefox program folder.
> Delete active-update.xml, updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
> start Firefox
> 

That seems to have worked, thank you.

It is basically the information given in the link provided by Chris 
(<http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version 
 >), although the description on that page is somewhat different than my 
situation, as I said.

Anyway, hopefully everything is OK now, and hopefully the situation 
won't repeat itself.

-- 
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
0
Herb
3/28/2007 4:55:37 AM
Herb wrote:
> On 27.03.2007 18:31 UK Time, Nir wrote:
>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D372123"
>>=20
>=20
> Thanks for the link, although it refers to Firefox 2.0.0.1=20
> auto-updating to 2.0.0.2
>=20
> In my case it's 'updating' from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2 =3D-O
>=20

"Bug 372123 =96 Firefox 2.0.0.1 auto-updated to 2.0.0.2 even though
updates were disabled"

and you said "In my case the Software Update window says "Firefox has
downloaded and verified an important update", despite the fact that I
have set FF to ask me what to do! " - what seemed to be similar issue.

well, I think this bug will not occur in future versions
"https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D368661"





0
Nir
3/28/2007 6:58:09 AM
On 28.03.2007 07:58 UK Time, Nir wrote:
> Herb wrote:
>> On 27.03.2007 18:31 UK Time, Nir wrote:
>>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the link, although it refers to Firefox 2.0.0.1 
>> auto-updating to 2.0.0.2
>>
>> In my case it's 'updating' from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2 =-O
>>
> 
> "Bug 372123 � Firefox 2.0.0.1 auto-updated to 2.0.0.2 even though
> updates were disabled"
> 
> and you said "In my case the Software Update window says "Firefox has
> downloaded and verified an important update", despite the fact that I
> have set FF to ask me what to do! " - what seemed to be similar issue.

Yes, it is/was indeed similar, except it was a backwards 'update' 
attempt =-O

> 
> well, I think this bug will not occur in future versions
> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=368661"

I'm pleased to hear it, thank you :-)

-- 
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk
0
Herb
3/28/2007 8:07:37 AM
Well, here we are two weeks later and the same thing just happened to me, i.e., a popup
saying v. 2.0.0.2 has just been downloaded...(etc)
even though I've been running 2.0.0.3 since March 23!  My prefs are set for automatic update,
but one would think the script would be clever enough to recognize it is going backwards!
This 2.0.0.3 version has been cranky, but if I recall correctly, the 2.0.0.3 update was
primarily for security reasons.  If in fact it does degrade to .2, I suppose I can just
manually reinstall the .3.
It's a pain to retrain NoScript, etc. though!

dAVEr


Herb wrote:
> On 27.03.2007 18:41 UK Time, Nir wrote:
>> Nir wrote:
>>> Herb wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
>>>> =-O
>>>>
>>>
>>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>>>
>> and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
>> and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
>> close firefox.
>> goto firefox program folder.
>> Delete active-update.xml, updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
>> start Firefox
>>
> 
> Thanks for your advice.
> 
> I haven't yet shut down FF since the message appeared.
> 
> Do you think the advice is still relevant, despite the fact that in my 
> (and in the OP's case) the 'update' is from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2, not from 
> 2.0.0.1 to 2.0.0.2??
> 
> By the way, I'm surprised there aren't more complains about this recent 
> update experience. How come only the OP and I appear to be affected by 
> this specific situation?
> 
> Something to do with extensions, perhaps?
> 
0
dAVEr
4/13/2007 5:57:48 PM
dAVEr wrote:
> Well, here we are two weeks later and the same thing just happened to
>  me, i.e., a popup saying v. 2.0.0.2 has just been downloaded...(etc)
>  even though I've been running 2.0.0.3 since March 23!  My prefs are
> set for automatic update, but one would think the script would be
> clever enough to recognize it is going backwards! This 2.0.0.3
> version has been cranky, but if I recall correctly, the 2.0.0.3
> update was primarily for security reasons.  If in fact it does
> degrade to .2, I suppose I can just manually reinstall the .3. It's a
> pain to retrain NoScript, etc. though!

To Herb , Dave ,
its a bug "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710"

0
Nir
4/13/2007 7:29:13 PM
On Apr 13, 1:57 pm, dAVEr <lod...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Well, here we are two weeks later and the same thing just happened to me, i.e., a popup
> saying v. 2.0.0.2 has just been downloaded...(etc)
> even though I've been running 2.0.0.3 since March 23!  My prefs are set for automatic update,
> but one would think the script would be clever enough to recognize it is going backwards!
> This 2.0.0.3 version has been cranky, but if I recall correctly, the 2.0.0.3 update was
> primarily for security reasons.  If in fact it does degrade to .2, I suppose I can just
> manually reinstall the .3.
> It's a pain to retrain NoScript, etc. though!
>
> dAVEr
>
> Herb wrote:
> > On 27.03.2007 18:41 UK Time, Nir wrote:
> >> Nir wrote:
> >>> Herb wrote:
>
> >>>> This is not good, and I wonder what will happen when I restart FF?
> >>>> =-O
>
> >>> "https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372123"
>
> >> and if you find that firefox has downloaded(without permission) update
> >> and ask you to restart FF , select 'No'
> >> close firefox.
> >> goto firefox program folder.
> >> Delete active-update.xml,updates.xml and the complete "updates" folder.
> >> start Firefox
>
> > Thanks for your advice.
>
> > I haven't yet shut down FF since the message appeared.
>
> > Do you think the advice is still relevant, despite the fact that in my
> > (and in the OP's case) the 'update' is from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2, not from
> > 2.0.0.1 to 2.0.0.2??
>
> > By the way, I'm surprised there aren't more complains about this recent
> > update experience. How come only the OP and I appear to be affected by
> > this specific situation?
>
> > Something to do with extensions, perhaps?

I had the same thing happen to me just now. I changed to 'Ask me what
to do' if it really makes any difference. This is the first time it
happened.

0
Sekretar
5/3/2007 2:53:40 AM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

Upgraded from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???
Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... is there a reason? On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The > downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... > is there a reason? I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems" process, and then...

Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: badidea Email: very_bad_ideaathotmaildotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I don't know what changed since 2.0.0.1 but the new releases (2.0.0.2, 2.0.0.3) seem very buggy. Random crashes, slow responses and additionally problems with administrator rights. I had similar problems on 2 out of 2 systems. Best solution for me (and probably a lot of other users) is to go back to 2.0.0.1 and disable automatic update. Success! Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2....

Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2?
Name: Russell Nelson Email: rnelsonatgenedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2? Comments: I am currently using a version of Firefox with the version number of 2.0.0.3. This is the second time that I have been told that it has now been updated to a newer version of Firefox with a version number of 2.0.0.2. I assume that 2.0.0.3 is newer (and better) than version 2.0.0.2. How can I stop this "update"? Russ Nelson 650-225-7212 Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070...

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure #2
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3
Name: Alexander Wijnhamer Email: arvwijnhameratlycosdotnl Product: Firefox Summary: Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 Comments: I get a pop-up that: "Firefox was unable to verify the integrity of the incremental update it downloaded, so it is now downloading the complete update package" However the counter is at 4 of 4 kb and has been for 5 minutes now. It doesn't seem to be doing anything. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3
Name: Ed Strait Email: estraitateds-placedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3 Comments: A week or so ago I was prompted to download and install version 2.0.0.3 as an upgrade from 2.0.0.2. I selected the upgrade and was running the ..3 version since. This morning, out of now where, it downloaded the .2 version and ask to to install which it looked as if I had no choice. After it restarted it was showing that I was running the .2. I then went and checked for any updates and it found the .3 again and installed it. Now I'm back to the .3 again. Any rea...

Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: John P Wright Email: klemnoctraatyahoodotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I have been reminded at regular intervals ( when online) by a pop up indicating that upgrade to 2.0.0.3 is recommended. I have now performed this exercise twice but the reminder pop up keeps re-appearing. Also the 'about Mozilla Firefox' tab persists in indicating that I am running 2.0.0.2 The update appeared in both cases to download and update without error or information on any problem found. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win...

Firefox 2.0.0.2 & 2.0.0.3 niggly problem
I just upgraded both my desktop and my laptop to FF v2.0.0.2 a couple days ago. Both began doing the same annoying thing. When I click a URL shortcut on my desktop or a link in my newsreader, an error box pops up saying "File http://blahblahblah or one of its components not found. Make sure the path and filename are correct." Then FF goes ahead and loads the page. This doesn't happen if FF is already running. If it's not running, it happens every time. I just downloaded 2.0.0.3. Same story. Any clues? -- Dale Beckett Dale Beckett wrote:...

Firefox 2.0.0.3 and 2.0.0.4
In order to fix a small number of serious regressions, we are looking to do a very quick 2.0.0.3/1.5.0.11 release to pick up some fixes for recent regressions. 2.0.0.4/1.5.0.12 will be the next regular security/stability releases. 2.0.0.3 blockers https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi? keywords_type=nowords&keywords=fixed1.8.1.3 +verified1.8.1.3&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=b locking1.8.1.3%2B&order=map_assigned_to.login_name,bugs.bug_id We are going to be looking at nominations over the next few days, based on the follo...

superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 #2
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 262259: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=262259&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> Updated with comments, I'm going to comm...

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Firefox 2.0.0.17 / 3.0.2, 3.0.3 Post Mortem
Hey all, We'll be doing a post-mortem on the recent branch releases - long overdue, sorry for the delay in scheduling. Details: * Thursday - 2:00pm Pacific, 5:00pm Eastern, 21:00 UTC * Mozilla Building S - <script> conference room * 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x91 Conf# 8605 (US/INTL) * 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 8605 (US) * irc.mozilla.org #postmortem for backchannel Agenda * identifying problems that caused the respins * identifying issues missed which caused 3.0.3 * analysis of large vs. small releases * communic...

superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> I've cleaned up the last patch a little, a...

XP SP2 DDE problems with Firefox anyone? (v.2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3)
I had a strange issue crop up the other day, shortly after (but not immediately after) I had upgraded Firefox to v2.0.0.3. Every time I launched a shortcut, or typed a URL from the "run..." line, I got an error message: :"Windows cannot find '[full url here]'. Make sure you typed the name correctly, :and then try again. To search for a file, click the Start button, and then :click Search." [Dialogue button: OK] The site would launch normally, but the annoying dialogue would always pop up. If the browser was open already, there was no error message. ...

Web resources about - Upgrading from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2??? - mozilla.support.firefox

Facebook Starts Upgrading Profiles To Timeline
A couple of readers told us that timeline previews have kicked in on their profiles without their having initiated the change themselves. A welcome ...

Facebook Upgrading “Insights” Metrics Dashboard for Page Managers Tonight
Facebook has just begun pushing an upgrade to its “Insights” metrics dashboard for Facebook Pages that gives administrators more visibility into ...

Flickr: Help: Free Accounts, Upgrading and Gifts
Flickr is almost certainly the best online photo management and sharing application in the world. Show off your favorite photos and videos to ...

Mac Spoofed: Upgrading [Low Quality]
PC teaches Mac about the benefits of upgradability.

Coalition's NBN will need ongoing, costly upgrading, experts warn
The Coalition's planned broadband infrastructure will "freeze" broadband speeds, and need ongoing and expensive upgrading to resemble the system ...

Beware of unintended and costly consequences when upgrading houses
Meeting the Building Code measures on energy efficiency is a potentially tricky business, even if you are upgrading or extending only one part ...

Nuclear states still upgrading stocks
Nuclear armed states continue to upgrade their stockpiles despite s trend towards global disarmament.

Looks like Labor's upgrading from Tarago to minibus
The people of Stafford have done the rest of Queensland a favour by electing Dr Anthony Lynham.

Promise check: $16m towards upgrading Hobart's Cadbury factory
Keep track of the Coalition's promise to spend $16 million on upgrading Hobart's Cadbury chocolate factory.

Upgrading IOIO to Bluetooth - YouTube
An instructional video showing how to upgrade IOIO's firmware in order to make it Bluetooth capable. Downloads are at: https://github.com/yt ...

Resources last updated: 1/16/2016 6:30:04 PM