Assigned to Fix - "Assigned To:" = "Reporter"

Hi All:

I have seen this thread on the group but I am unclear on the solution.
Question:
Is there anyway to set the bug as "Fixed" and have it automatically
reassign to the reporter for verification without have to do the
multiple steps?

The solution i have seen on the thread is:

You have to modify process_bug.cgi.
        Look for the line that contains:
        ChangeResolution("FIXED")

Do I change the ChangeResolution(x) to ChangeResolution to (Fixed)?

Thxs john

0
BumNSun
10/17/2007 5:15:27 PM
mozilla.support.bugzilla 10122 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

4 Replies
770 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 52

John,

2007/10/17, BumNSun <jlevstek13@yahoo.com>:
> Is there anyway to set the bug as "Fixed" and have it automatically
> reassign to the reporter for verification without have to do the
> multiple steps?

you may want or need to do it differently at your site, but I find it
of advantage to keep the assignee field as is, so that the person who
worked on the bug is easily visible. Being the assignee field marks my
role in the bug (as opposed to being the one who's got to take the
next action). The one who's got to take the next action depends on the
bug's state -- NEW or ASSIGNED means the assignee needs to take the
next action, RESOLVED may mean it's the reporter, VERIFIED may mean
it's the QA contact.

   Regards
      Marc
0
Marc
10/17/2007 5:57:36 PM
On Oct 17, 10:57 am, "Marc Schumann" <wurbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> John,
>
> 2007/10/17, BumNSun <jlevste...@yahoo.com>:
>
> > Is there anyway to set the bug as "Fixed" and have it automatically
> > reassign to the reporter for verification without have to do the
> > multiple steps?
>
> you may want or need to do it differently at your site, but I find it
> of advantage to keep the assignee field as is, so that the person who
> worked on the bug is easily visible. Being the assignee field marks my
> role in the bug (as opposed to being the one who's got to take the
> next action). The one who's got to take the next action depends on the
> bug's state -- NEW or ASSIGNED means the assignee needs to take the
> next action, RESOLVED may mean it's the reporter, VERIFIED may mean
> it's the QA contact.
>
>    Regards
>       Marc

Thxs Marc.

Question:  How do you have Bugzilla setup so that when a Bug is fixed
the Reporter is notified in their "My Bugs" folder?

The problem we are facing is a Bug is moved from New to fixed.  In our
process the Reporter goes back and verifies the fix.  The only
notification is for the Program manager to review all defects(using
Excel as a tool) and send out an email.It would be nice to have the
Bug pushed back to the Reporter (in My Bugs folder).

Thxs in advance

john

0
BumNSun
10/18/2007 3:26:09 PM

BumNSun wrote:
> 
> On Oct 17, 10:57 am, "Marc Schumann" <wurbl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be nice to have the Bug pushed back to the Reporter (in My Bugs
> folder).
> 

You could create a custom link that would do a query like [MyBugs], but with
the desired options.  Then add that to the footer for your site.

**OR**

have your QA staff set up a search using [product] [status =
resolved][resolution = fixed] and select Email: reporter = them. Then save
the search.

You can skip resolution if they also must look at all resolved bugs. (My
team only deals with Resolved-Fixed while I take care of the other
resolutions)

Once they have a query saved, they can set up a Whine.

**OR**

You could set these searches up for each of your team members and send a
whine to them if you have "White At Others" permissions.

Good Luck,
Unca Ghrys
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assigned-to-Fix---%22Assigned-To%3A%22-%3D-%22Reporter%22-tf4642077.html#a13277852
Sent from the Bugzilla - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

0
Unca
10/18/2007 4:03:43 PM

BumNSun wrote:
> 
> It would be nice to have the Bug pushed back to the Reporter (in My Bugs
> folder).
> 

You could create a custom link that would do a query like [MyBugs], but with
the desired options.  Then add that to the footer for your site.

**OR**

have your QA staff set up a search using [product] [status =
resolved][resolution = fixed] and select Email: reporter = them. Then save
the search.

You can skip resolution if they also must look at all resolved bugs. (My
team only deals with Resolved-Fixed while I take care of the other
resolutions)

Once they have a query saved, they can set up a Whine.

**OR**

You could set these searches up for each of your team members and send a
whine to them if you have "White At Others" permissions.

Good Luck,
Unca Ghrys
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assigned-to-Fix---%22Assigned-To%3A%22-%3D-%22Reporter%22-tf4642077.html#a13277852
Sent from the Bugzilla - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

0
Unca
10/18/2007 4:04:06 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

How can I assign fixed margins to the reports
 Hai        In my report.rdlc in page setup I had set the left margin to .5 and right margin to .2 but when I opens the next report the setup changes to the default left margin ie, 1 and right margin to default 1      How can I assign fixed margins to the reports so that it prints in the correct places Regards Anu Palavila You have the set the page margin for each rdl file (report) seprately if you wish to change the default value for that report.Please feel free to let me know if you are not clear or I’ve misunderstood anything. ...

Bugzilla Workflow question: Assign to QA contact once status is fixed.
Hi, As per the normal work flow of the Bugzilla once the developer change the status to fixed, there is no provision to automatically assign it to the QA contact person.But in Organizations after developer fixing the issue it should automatically go to QA person. Currently we have to re-open the bug to re-assign it to the QA person. How this can be done automatically through Bugzilla.Ie once the bug is fixed it should automatically assign to the QA-Contact even though it is in the fixed state. Request your comments Regards Sandeep -- ...

Bugzilla: Assign to
When I put a New bug, the field Assign To: its a input type text box, but what I want its a dropdown menu, <select>, its this possible ?, someone can help me with this one. I can hack it, but I want to know if there are some preferences / parameters for this issue. Thanks a lot. -- eft0 eft0, this comes with 2.19. Be sure to turn the usemenuforusers parameter on. Kind regards Marc On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:00:58 -0300, eft0 <eft0@gmx.nospam.net> wrote: > When I put a New bug, the field Assign To: its a input type text box, > but what I want ...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 321757] Compound assignment operators (+= etc.) prematurely bind LHS of assignment : [Attachment 210210] proposed fix
Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> has cancelled Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 321757: Compound assignment operators (+= etc.) prematurely bind LHS of assignment https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=321757 Attachment 210210: proposed fix https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=210210&action=edit ...

superreview requested: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233732] fix, take 2
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has asked Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233732: fix, take 2 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233732&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> This is the same patch that I landed, but with these changes: - XUL_FASTLOAD_FILE_VERSION changed yet again - Beefy assertion in JSOP_LEAVEBLOCK to catch any non-blocks on fp->blockChain. - G...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233939] fix, take 3a
Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> has cancelled Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233939: fix, take 3a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233939&action=edit ...

superreview requested: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233939] fix, take 3a
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has asked Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233939: fix, take 3a https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233939&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> What I'm about to land. Same as last time except the jsint count = -1 in the TOK_TRY js_EmitTree case uses 0 as the initializer now, and the assertion that it's non-negative now asserts tha...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233732] fix, take 2
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has cancelled Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233732: fix, take 2 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233732&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> Oops, didn't mean to revert the fix for bug 348685. /be ...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233733] fix, take 3
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has cancelled Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233733: fix, take 3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233733&action=edit ...

superreview requested: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 233733] fix, take 3
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has asked Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 233733: fix, take 3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=233733&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> Oops, didn't mean to revert the fix for bug 348685. /be ...

superreview requested: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 234116] updated to track trunk and fix pn_extra abusage
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has asked Mike Shaver <shaver@mozilla.org> for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 234116: updated to track trunk and fix pn_extra abusage https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=234116&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> This also renames JSOP_INITCATCHVAR to JSOP_SETLOCALPOP (same functionality, stack arity, etc.). It turns out we want popping setters for destructuring at least, ...

Assigning fix elements of array into fix variables efficiently
Hi, Suppose I have this array: @array = (10,11,12) #fix to three element is there any way I can assign each any of these elements into variable ($A, $B, $C) in a quick way. Such that $A = 10, $B =11, $C=12 (this is fixed). The way I can think of is : $A = @array[1], etc.....But this isn efficient. Thanks before hand. Hope to hear from you again. Regards, Edward WIJAYA SINGAPORE did U try this: ($a,$b,$c) = @array; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Edward Wijaya" <ewijaya@i2r.a-star.edu.sg> To: <beginners@perl.org> Sent: Monday, Au...

Creating a Landscape report (without assigning a printer to a report)
I am using Crystal bundled with VS.NET 2003.  I want to design some landscape reports.  I noticed that if you right click on the report and select Designer -> Printer Setup, there is an option to select landscape, but to do so, you must select a printer.  We have our reports currently set up with "No Printer".  The reason we did this, is because in old past versions, when we would have a printer selected, it seemed the report didn't look correct on all printers.If I select a printer, then pick Landscape in this dialog, will that force my report ...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 336379] Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 : [Attachment 234116] destructuring catch variables, updated to track trunk and fix pn_extra abusage
Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> has cancelled Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 336379: Support destructuring assignment in JS1.7 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336379 Attachment 234116: destructuring catch variables, updated to track trunk and fix pn_extra abusage https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=234116&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Brendan Eich <brendan@mozilla.org> Pre-existing code in LetBlock was not combining consequents under one if test, making a gratuitous else (gratuit...

Is it necessary to have a role assignement for each user who views a Reporting Services Report
I am connecting to my Reporting Services Reports via C# and the Report viewer control. I was not able to view my Reporting services reports though, until I associated a new Role Assignment with my Domain and Username for the specific report that I wanted to view. It appears to me that whomever wishes to view the reports my have a new Role Assignment associated with the report. Can anyone tell me if there is a way to bypass having to create a "New Role Assignment" for each report?? This is done through the report manager web interface by going to the Security section associated with...

Web resources about - Assigned to Fix - "Assigned To:" = "Reporter" - mozilla.support.bugzilla

Resources last updated: 11/28/2015 11:48:56 AM