2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure #2Name: firefox_fan
Product: Firefox
Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure
Comments:
The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP
SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries
to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over
come this problem.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
...
2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3Name: Ed Strait
Email: estraitateds-placedotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: 2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3
Comments:
A week or so ago I was prompted to download and install version 2.0.0.3
as an upgrade from 2.0.0.2. I selected the upgrade and was running the
..3 version since. This morning, out of now where, it downloaded the .2
version and ask to to install which it looked as if I had no choice.
After it restarted it was showing that I was running the .2. I then went
and checked for any updates and it found the .3 again and installed it.
Now I'm back to the .3 again. Any rea...
Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3Name: John P Wright
Email: klemnoctraatyahoodotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Comments:
I have been reminded at regular intervals ( when online) by a pop up
indicating that upgrade to 2.0.0.3 is recommended. I have now performed
this exercise twice but the reminder pop up keeps re-appearing. Also the
'about Mozilla Firefox' tab persists in indicating that I am running
2.0.0.2 The update appeared in both cases to download and update
without error or information on any problem found.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.2
...
Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3Name: Alexander Wijnhamer
Email: arvwijnhameratlycosdotnl
Product: Firefox
Summary: Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3
Comments:
I get a pop-up that: "Firefox was unable to verify the integrity of the
incremental update it downloaded, so it is now downloading the complete
update package"
However the counter is at 4 of 4 kb and has been for 5 minutes now. It
doesn't seem to be doing anything.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
...
Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3Name: badidea
Email: very_bad_ideaathotmaildotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Comments:
I don't know what changed since 2.0.0.1 but the new releases (2.0.0.2,
2.0.0.3) seem very buggy. Random crashes, slow responses and
additionally problems with administrator rights.
I had similar problems on 2 out of 2 systems. Best solution for me (and
probably a lot of other users) is to go back to 2.0.0.1 and disable
automatic update.
Success!
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2....
2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failureName: firefox_fan
Product: Firefox
Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure
Comments:
The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP
SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries
to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over
come this problem.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
...
Upgraded from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The
downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
is there a reason?
On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The
> downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ...
> is there a reason?
I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not
weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems"
process, and then...
Upgrading from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???Hi all,
My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
What is going on?
Regards,
alex
ozgwei@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week.
>
> However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have
> just received 2.0.0.2 as an update.
>
> What is going on?
>
> Regards,
> alex
>
Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting
messages about 2.0.0.2?
Lee
...
Firefox 2.0.0.2 & 2.0.0.3 niggly problem
I just upgraded both my desktop and my laptop to FF v2.0.0.2 a couple days
ago. Both began doing the same annoying thing. When I click a URL
shortcut on my desktop or a link in my newsreader, an error box pops up
saying "File http://blahblahblah or one of its components not found. Make
sure the path and filename are correct." Then FF goes ahead and loads the
page.
This doesn't happen if FF is already running. If it's not running, it
happens every time.
I just downloaded 2.0.0.3. Same story.
Any clues?
--
Dale Beckett
Dale Beckett wrote:...
Firefox 2.0.0.3 and 2.0.0.4In order to fix a small number of serious regressions, we are looking
to do a very quick 2.0.0.3/1.5.0.11 release to pick up some fixes for
recent regressions. 2.0.0.4/1.5.0.12 will be the next regular
security/stability releases.
2.0.0.3 blockers
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?
keywords_type=nowords&keywords=fixed1.8.1.3
+verified1.8.1.3&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=b
locking1.8.1.3%2B&order=map_assigned_to.login_name,bugs.bug_id
We are going to be looking at nominations over the next few days,
based on the follo...
superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 #2Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth
Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview:
Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710
Attachment 262259: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add
debugging code, rev. 1.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=262259&action=edit
------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@)
<benjamin@smedbergs.us>
Updated with comments, I'm going to comm...
Have 2.0.0.3.Name: Mickey Mouse
Email: grabthebonusatgmaildotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: Have 2.0.0.3. - just received 2.0.0.2. as an "Update"?
Comments:
Hi,
I have version 2.0.0.3 installed. I just got a dialogue box telling me
that I have received 2.0.0.2 as an update. This obviously doesn't make
sense. What is going on here?
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
...
Firefox 2.0.0.17 / 3.0.2, 3.0.3 Post MortemHey all,
We'll be doing a post-mortem on the recent branch releases - long
overdue, sorry for the delay in scheduling. Details:
* Thursday - 2:00pm Pacific, 5:00pm Eastern, 21:00 UTC
* Mozilla Building S - <script> conference room
* 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x91 Conf# 8605 (US/INTL)
* 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 8605 (US)
* irc.mozilla.org #postmortem for backchannel
Agenda
* identifying problems that caused the respins
* identifying issues missed which caused 3.0.3
* analysis of large vs. small releases
* communic...
2.0.0.3 Says it found new version, but it's 2.0.0.2The Updated version dialog pops up and says the latest version is
2.0.0.2, but I'm running 2.0.0.3! I went ahead and did the update, and
sure enough, I now have 2.0.0.2. And when I check for updates, it
says there are no new versions. Did Mozilla do this on purpose? Is
this happening to anyone besides me?
jishcat@gmail.com wrote:
> The Updated version dialog pops up and says the latest version is
> 2.0.0.2, but I'm running 2.0.0.3! I went ahead and did the update, and
> sure enough, I now have 2.0.0.2. And when I check for updates, it
> says there are no new...
Firefox 2.0.0.2.0. updateName: aprilneault
Email: aprilneault24athotmaildotcom
Product: Other (please state)
Summary: Firefox 2.0.0.2.0. update
Comments:
It seems as if your new version quickly sets up a network that my
computer is meant to connect to before the internet. However, the stops
me from connecting to the internet. And now my Internet Explorer
doesn't work due to your update. This is very frustrating. I have been
circumventing the process by restoring my computer to an earlier date.
However, there is no escaping your updates. It just keeps popping up
and I don't even have a ...
updating 2.0.0.1 to 2.0.0.2 is confusing at best.Name: Raymond Gray
Email: rcg123atoptonlinedotnet
Product: Firefox
Summary: updating 2.0.0.1 to 2.0.0.2 is confusing at best.
Comments:
I tried a few times to find the upgrade at the Firefox web site but only
found the complete 2.0.0.2 install file.
then I used the HELP > Check for Updates and found, downloaded and
installed the 2.0.0.2 update. When it was completed, I re-launched
firefox and checked the ABOUT, which showed 2.0.0.2
Yet today I got a firefox notice that an update was available; checked
ABOUT again and it's back to 2.0.0.1.
This does not give me...
superreview cancelled: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has cancelled
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us>'s request for
superreview:
Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710
Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add
debugging code, rev. 1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit
------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@)
<benjamin@smedbergs.us>
Updated with comments, I&...
superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth
Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview:
Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710
Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add
debugging code, rev. 1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit
------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@)
<benjamin@smedbergs.us>
I've cleaned up the last patch a little, and added some logging code which I
can use to manually detect whether this is working properly. Unfortunately, I
can't figure out a way to do an automated test of this without polluting
c:\Program Files, which is not a good thing to do on test machines anyway.
To test, install Firefox to c:\Program Files\SomeDir and run firefox
-print-xpcom-dir UpdRootD; check the JS console or stdout (if dump is enabled)
for a message about a path under the local user's home. Running the same test
from a Firefox installed anywhere else should dump <Not Provided>.
...
XP SP2 DDE problems with Firefox anyone? (v.2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3)I had a strange issue crop up the other day, shortly after (but not immediately
after) I had upgraded Firefox to v2.0.0.3.
Every time I launched a shortcut, or typed a URL from the "run..." line, I got
an error message:
:"Windows cannot find '[full url here]'. Make sure you typed the name correctly,
:and then try again. To search for a file, click the Start button, and then
:click Search." [Dialogue button: OK]
The site would launch normally, but the annoying dialogue would always pop up.
If the browser was open already, there was no error message.
...
in Firefox 2.0.0.6 Firefox 2.0.0.3 is still downloading under HelpName: Marika
Email: controlatrocketpropdotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: in Firefox 2.0.0.6 Firefox 2.0.0.3 is still downloading under Help
Comments:
Circle spinning next to Downloading Firefox 2.0.0.3
but Firefox 2.0.0.6 has been downloaded and installed.
MacBook (Intel)Boot Camp installation WinXP Pro SP2
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6
...
Online Firefox Update ver. 2.0.0.0 to ver. 2.0.0.1 failsName: user - europe
Product: Firefox
Summary: Online Firefox Update ver. 2.0.0.0 to ver. 2.0.0.1 fails
Comments:
The online update ver. 2.0.0.0 to ver. 2.0.0.1 indicates
that a number of files could not be updated resp. installed,
although I folowed your instruction and closed as many running
applications as possible.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0
...
printing issues with firefox 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.3Name: ledatica
Email: ledaticaathotmaildotcom
Product: Firefox
Summary: printing issues with firefox 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.3
Comments:
OS - windows XP home edition with SP2
After installing Firefox version 2.0.0.3 I noticed that web page
printing is out of order, when the xp user account is a limited account.
I checked to see the print preview and that showed me only partial page
displayed and only prints partial page. I logged back on as XP admin
account and checked the same web page again. This time both the print
preview and the actual printing came out exactly as the web...
Update of Firefox 2.0.0.5 to 2.0.0.6 failsName: Franz Baader
Email: FranzdotBaaderatt-onlinedotde
Product: Firefox
Summary: Update of Firefox 2.0.0.5 to 2.0.0.6 fails
Comments:
Update of Firefox 2.0.0.5 to 2.0.0.6 (German) fails with a message in
German like "one or more files couldn't be updated".
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.1.5) Gecko/20070713 Firefox/2.0.0.5
...
Firefox 2.0.0.3hi;
my site is http://www.nedir.net. it's frame based. any user login to
this site and server create a session. user click any subject from
left frame and show content to main frame, session ok! but users when
jump to other page (1-2-3 .. ) at content page, session cannot load.
this problem for only some firefox users, not ie, opera etc..
math wrote:
> hi;
> my site is http://www.nedir.net. it's frame based. any user login to
> this site and server create a session. user click any subject from
> left frame and show content to main frame, session ok! but users w...