superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 #2

Benjamin Smedberg  [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth
Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview:
Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710

Attachment 262259: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add
debugging code, rev. 1.1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=262259&action=edit

------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg  [:bs] (bsmedberg@)
<benjamin@smedbergs.us>
Updated with comments, I'm going to commit this on trunk. Seth, I'd still like
you to look over this if you have time.
0
bugzilla
4/20/2007 3:15:10 PM
mozilla.dev.super-review 29307 articles. 3 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
1316 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 1

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> I've cleaned up the last patch a little, a...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has cancelled Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us>'s request for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> Updated with comments, I&...

Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: badidea Email: very_bad_ideaathotmaildotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I don't know what changed since 2.0.0.1 but the new releases (2.0.0.2, 2.0.0.3) seem very buggy. Random crashes, slow responses and additionally problems with administrator rights. I had similar problems on 2 out of 2 systems. Best solution for me (and probably a lot of other users) is to go back to 2.0.0.1 and disable automatic update. Success! Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2....

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure #2
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

superreview requested: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2. 0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. #2
T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org> has asked Robert O'Callahan <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 261164: compact logic https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261164&action=edit ...

Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2?
Name: Russell Nelson Email: rnelsonatgenedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2? Comments: I am currently using a version of Firefox with the version number of 2.0.0.3. This is the second time that I have been told that it has now been updated to a newer version of Firefox with a version number of 2.0.0.2. I assume that 2.0.0.3 is newer (and better) than version 2.0.0.2. How can I stop this "update"? Russ Nelson 650-225-7212 Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070...

Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3
Name: Alexander Wijnhamer Email: arvwijnhameratlycosdotnl Product: Firefox Summary: Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 Comments: I get a pop-up that: "Firefox was unable to verify the integrity of the incremental update it downloaded, so it is now downloading the complete update package" However the counter is at 4 of 4 kb and has been for 5 minutes now. It doesn't seem to be doing anything. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3
Name: Ed Strait Email: estraitateds-placedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3 Comments: A week or so ago I was prompted to download and install version 2.0.0.3 as an upgrade from 2.0.0.2. I selected the upgrade and was running the ..3 version since. This morning, out of now where, it downloaded the .2 version and ask to to install which it looked as if I had no choice. After it restarted it was showing that I was running the .2. I then went and checked for any updates and it found the .3 again and installed it. Now I'm back to the .3 again. Any rea...

Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: John P Wright Email: klemnoctraatyahoodotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I have been reminded at regular intervals ( when online) by a pop up indicating that upgrade to 2.0.0.3 is recommended. I have now performed this exercise twice but the reminder pop up keeps re-appearing. Also the 'about Mozilla Firefox' tab persists in indicating that I am running 2.0.0.2 The update appeared in both cases to download and update without error or information on any problem found. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win...

Upgraded from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???
Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... is there a reason? On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The > downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... > is there a reason? I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems" process, and then...

Upgrading from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???
Hi all, My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week. However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have just received 2.0.0.2 as an update. What is going on? Regards, alex ozgwei@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week. > > However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have > just received 2.0.0.2 as an update. > > What is going on? > > Regards, > alex > Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting messages about 2.0.0.2? Lee ...

superreview requested: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2. 0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1.
T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org> has asked Robert O'Callahan <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 260740: add test as suggested https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=260740&action=edit ...

Firefox 2.0.0.2 & 2.0.0.3 niggly problem
I just upgraded both my desktop and my laptop to FF v2.0.0.2 a couple days ago. Both began doing the same annoying thing. When I click a URL shortcut on my desktop or a link in my newsreader, an error box pops up saying "File http://blahblahblah or one of its components not found. Make sure the path and filename are correct." Then FF goes ahead and loads the page. This doesn't happen if FF is already running. If it's not running, it happens every time. I just downloaded 2.0.0.3. Same story. Any clues? -- Dale Beckett Dale Beckett wrote:...

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Web resources about - superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 #2 - mozilla.dev.super-review

Biz & Finance Magazines
Australian magazine subscriptions price comparison.

Ehsan Akhgari
Bugzilla is an essential tool to the working process of Mozilla, and many of us spend a good portion of their day in Bugzilla. The Bugzilla Tweaks ...

Resources last updated: 12/20/2015 11:37:03 PM