superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3

Benjamin Smedberg  [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth
Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview:
Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710

Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add
debugging code, rev. 1
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit

------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg  [:bs] (bsmedberg@)
<benjamin@smedbergs.us>
I've cleaned up the last patch a little, and added some logging code which I
can use to manually detect whether this is working properly. Unfortunately, I
can't figure out a way to do an automated test of this without polluting
c:\Program Files, which is not a good thing to do on test machines anyway.

To test, install Firefox to c:\Program Files\SomeDir and run firefox
-print-xpcom-dir UpdRootD; check the JS console or stdout (if dump is enabled)
for a message about a path under the local user's home. Running the same test
from a Firefox installed anywhere else should dump <Not Provided>.
0
bugzilla
4/18/2007 4:30:15 PM
mozilla.dev.super-review 29307 articles. 3 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
829 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 36

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 #2
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has asked Seth Spitzer [:ss] (away until 4/30) <sspitzer@mozilla.com> for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 262259: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=262259&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> Updated with comments, I'm going to comm...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3
Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> has cancelled Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us>'s request for superreview: Bug 375710: Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0.2 from 2.0.0.3 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375710 Attachment 261972: Normalize to longnames using a dirprovider, and add debugging code, rev. 1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261972&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Benjamin Smedberg [:bs] (bsmedberg@) <benjamin@smedbergs.us> Updated with comments, I&...

Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: badidea Email: very_bad_ideaathotmaildotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Buggy firefox 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I don't know what changed since 2.0.0.1 but the new releases (2.0.0.2, 2.0.0.3) seem very buggy. Random crashes, slow responses and additionally problems with administrator rights. I had similar problems on 2 out of 2 systems. Best solution for me (and probably a lot of other users) is to go back to 2.0.0.1 and disable automatic update. Success! Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2....

superreview requested: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2. 0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. #2
T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org> has asked Robert O'Callahan <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 261164: compact logic https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261164&action=edit ...

Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2?
Name: Russell Nelson Email: rnelsonatgenedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Firefox version 2.0.0.3 is being updated to 2.0.0.2? Comments: I am currently using a version of Firefox with the version number of 2.0.0.3. This is the second time that I have been told that it has now been updated to a newer version of Firefox with a version number of 2.0.0.2. I assume that 2.0.0.3 is newer (and better) than version 2.0.0.2. How can I stop this "update"? Russ Nelson 650-225-7212 Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070...

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure #2
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Upgrading from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???
Hi all, My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week. However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have just received 2.0.0.2 as an update. What is going on? Regards, alex ozgwei@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > My Firefox was upgraded to 2.0.0.3 last week. > > However, last night I got a pop-up window informing me that I have > just received 2.0.0.2 as an update. > > What is going on? > > Regards, > alex > Did you have 2.0.0.2 and updated to 2.0.0.3, and are not getting messages about 2.0.0.2? Lee ...

Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3
Name: Alexander Wijnhamer Email: arvwijnhameratlycosdotnl Product: Firefox Summary: Update from 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 Comments: I get a pop-up that: "Firefox was unable to verify the integrity of the incremental update it downloaded, so it is now downloading the complete update package" However the counter is at 4 of 4 kb and has been for 5 minutes now. It doesn't seem to be doing anything. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Upgraded from 2.0.0.3 to 2.0.0.2???
Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... is there a reason? On May 16, 1:45 pm, Dean Kay <dean...@earthlink.net> wrote: > Just downloaded a FireFox prompted update. I was running 2.0.0.3. The > downloaded update is 2.0.0.2 ... seems to me that's a step backwards ... > is there a reason? I had a weird instance today, where Firefox locked up (no, that's not weird...lol) on Vista, and so Vista did the "checking for problems" process, and then...

2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3
Name: Ed Strait Email: estraitateds-placedotcom Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to version 2.0.0.3 Comments: A week or so ago I was prompted to download and install version 2.0.0.3 as an upgrade from 2.0.0.2. I selected the upgrade and was running the ..3 version since. This morning, out of now where, it downloaded the .2 version and ask to to install which it looked as if I had no choice. After it restarted it was showing that I was running the .2. I then went and checked for any updates and it found the .3 again and installed it. Now I'm back to the .3 again. Any rea...

Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3
Name: John P Wright Email: klemnoctraatyahoodotcom Product: Firefox Summary: Update between 2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: I have been reminded at regular intervals ( when online) by a pop up indicating that upgrade to 2.0.0.3 is recommended. I have now performed this exercise twice but the reminder pop up keeps re-appearing. Also the 'about Mozilla Firefox' tab persists in indicating that I am running 2.0.0.2 The update appeared in both cases to download and update without error or information on any problem found. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win...

superreview requested: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2. 0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1.
T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org> has asked Robert O'Callahan <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 260740: add test as suggested https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=260740&action=edit ...

Firefox 2.0.0.2 & 2.0.0.3 niggly problem
I just upgraded both my desktop and my laptop to FF v2.0.0.2 a couple days ago. Both began doing the same annoying thing. When I click a URL shortcut on my desktop or a link in my newsreader, an error box pops up saying "File http://blahblahblah or one of its components not found. Make sure the path and filename are correct." Then FF goes ahead and loads the page. This doesn't happen if FF is already running. If it's not running, it happens every time. I just downloaded 2.0.0.3. Same story. Any clues? -- Dale Beckett Dale Beckett wrote:...

Firefox 2.0.0.3 and 2.0.0.4
In order to fix a small number of serious regressions, we are looking to do a very quick 2.0.0.3/1.5.0.11 release to pick up some fixes for recent regressions. 2.0.0.4/1.5.0.12 will be the next regular security/stability releases. 2.0.0.3 blockers https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi? keywords_type=nowords&keywords=fixed1.8.1.3 +verified1.8.1.3&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&type0-0-0=equals&value0-0-0=b locking1.8.1.3%2B&order=map_assigned_to.login_name,bugs.bug_id We are going to be looking at nominations over the next few days, based on the follo...

2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure
Name: firefox_fan Product: Firefox Summary: 2.0.0.2 to 2.0.0.3 update failure Comments: The new update fails to install other than in admin mode (Windows XP SP2). Now every time I start Firefox (other than admin mode), it tries to update but fails due to lack of privileges. Let me know how to over come this problem. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2 ...

Firefox 2.0.0.17 / 3.0.2, 3.0.3 Post Mortem
Hey all, We'll be doing a post-mortem on the recent branch releases - long overdue, sorry for the delay in scheduling. Details: * Thursday - 2:00pm Pacific, 5:00pm Eastern, 21:00 UTC * Mozilla Building S - <script> conference room * 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x91 Conf# 8605 (US/INTL) * 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 8605 (US) * irc.mozilla.org #postmortem for backchannel Agenda * identifying problems that caused the respins * identifying issues missed which caused 3.0.3 * analysis of large vs. small releases * communic...

XP SP2 DDE problems with Firefox anyone? (v.2.0.0.2 and 2.0.0.3)
I had a strange issue crop up the other day, shortly after (but not immediately after) I had upgraded Firefox to v2.0.0.3. Every time I launched a shortcut, or typed a URL from the "run..." line, I got an error message: :"Windows cannot find '[full url here]'. Make sure you typed the name correctly, :and then try again. To search for a file, click the Start button, and then :click Search." [Dialogue button: OK] The site would launch normally, but the annoying dialogue would always pop up. If the browser was open already, there was no error message. ...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2. 0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1.
T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org> has cancelled T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 260740: add test as suggested https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=260740&action=edit ...

superreview granted: [Bug 372232] text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0. 0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1.
Robert O'Callahan <roc@ocallahan.org> has granted T Rowley (IBM) <tor@acm.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 372232: text inside <svg> won't render in FF 2.0.0.2 (it shows in DOM tree). However, it renders inside 2.0.0 and 2.0.0.1. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=372232 Attachment 261164: compact logic https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=261164&action=edit ...

in Firefox 2.0.0.6 Firefox 2.0.0.3 is still downloading under Help
Name: Marika Email: controlatrocketpropdotcom Product: Firefox Summary: in Firefox 2.0.0.6 Firefox 2.0.0.3 is still downloading under Help Comments: Circle spinning next to Downloading Firefox 2.0.0.3 but Firefox 2.0.0.6 has been downloaded and installed. MacBook (Intel)Boot Camp installation WinXP Pro SP2 Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6) Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6 ...

Firefox 2.0.0.3
hi; my site is http://www.nedir.net. it's frame based. any user login to this site and server create a session. user click any subject from left frame and show content to main frame, session ok! but users when jump to other page (1-2-3 .. ) at content page, session cannot load. this problem for only some firefox users, not ie, opera etc.. math wrote: > hi; > my site is http://www.nedir.net. it's frame based. any user login to > this site and server create a session. user click any subject from > left frame and show content to main frame, session ok! but users w...

printing issues with firefox 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.3
Name: ledatica Email: ledaticaathotmaildotcom Product: Firefox Summary: printing issues with firefox 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.3 Comments: OS - windows XP home edition with SP2 After installing Firefox version 2.0.0.3 I noticed that web page printing is out of order, when the xp user account is a limited account. I checked to see the print preview and that showed me only partial page displayed and only prints partial page. I logged back on as XP admin account and checked the same web page again. This time both the print preview and the actual printing came out exactly as the web...

I like firefox 2.0.0.0 better than 2.0.0.1
Name: tsit chan Email: chantsitathkbndotnet Product: Firefox Summary: I like firefox 2.0.0.0 better than 2.0.0.1 Comments: 2.0.0.1 version allows minimized pages pop up when open multi- tabs in one page ,until this fixed i prefer 2.0.0.0 before any new release. Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061010 Firefox/2.0 ...

firefox 2.0.0.1 and 2.0.0.2 download window problem
I am having a problem with the download options in the browser. Hope I can explain this correctly so it makes sense. I went to "options" "download" and tried changing it there for various settings with no change. Problem just started with 2.0.01 and unfortunately the browser updated to 2.0.0.2 before I could stop it but problems still there. My other computer works fine with both versions so I think something got corrupted but don't know what or how to fix it. I don't want to uninstall FF and reinstall it and lose all my bookmarks. Is there a r...

Web resources about - superreview requested: [Bug 375710] Firefox wants to downgrade to 2.0.0. 2 from 2.0.0.3 - mozilla.dev.super-review

Biz & Finance Magazines
Australian magazine subscriptions price comparison.

Ehsan Akhgari
Bugzilla is an essential tool to the working process of Mozilla, and many of us spend a good portion of their day in Bugzilla. The Bugzilla Tweaks ...

Resources last updated: 2/25/2016 3:26:16 AM