superreview canceled: [Bug 93725] 'bolder' and 'lighter' keywords of 'font-weight' don't work : [Attachment 323226] possible patch for this and #77882

Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> has canceled Zack Weinberg
<zweinberg@mozilla.com>'s request for superreview:
Bug 93725: 'bolder' and 'lighter' keywords of 'font-weight' don't work
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93725

Attachment 323226: possible patch for this and #77882
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=323226&action=edit

------- Additional Comments from Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
retracting review request.
0
bugzilla
6/1/2008 5:04:21 PM
mozilla.dev.super-review 29307 articles. 3 followers. Post Follow

0 Replies
618 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 33

Reply:

Similar Artilces:

superreview requested: [Bug 93725] 'bolder' and 'lighter' keywords of 'font-weight' don't work : [Attachment 323226] possible patch for this and #77882
Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> has asked David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron@mozilla.com> for superreview: Bug 93725: 'bolder' and 'lighter' keywords of 'font-weight' don't work https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D93725 Attachment 323226: possible patch for this and #77882 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D323226&action=3Dedit ------- Additional Comments from Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com> This proved to be pretty simple to fix, with some caveats. The attached pa= tch passes Hixie's test linke...

''''''''''''''''''''
Name: haznen Email: haznenatyahoodotcom Product: Gran Paradiso Alpha 8 Summary: '''''''''''''''''''' Comments: '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20061204 UGES/1.7.2.0 GranParadiso/3.0a1 From URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/granparadiso/ Note to readers: Hendrix gives...

'''''
Name: mario Email: ramar17atfastwebnetdotit Product: Gran Paradiso Alpha 2 Summary: ''''' Comments: K: Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9a2) Gecko/20070206 GranParadiso/3.0a2 ...

'do' won't 'do' if '/'
Greetings to All from Au, Have a NetWare Perl 5.8.4 and wanted to tweak File\Spec\NW.pm to try and standardise on '/' separators. If I run a test script (t/uni/lower.t) with an unmodified NW.pm, it calls t/uni/case.pl, that, in case.pl, (when the path separators are '\'), the $file is '..\lib\unicore\To\Lower.pl' and the following code portion works, with $simple getting a returned table: sub casetest { my ($base, $spec, $func) = @_; my $file = File::Spec->catfile(File::Spec->catdir(File::Spec->updir, "lib", &qu...

'''
Name: L Lachowsky Email: e2brutus_10atyahoodotcom Product: Firefox Summary: ''' Comments: why duddn this surprise me... I change default server from IE to Mozilla, and then i get error messages. well, shud I decide to not get on my computer with Mozilla..or shud I risk security breeches with IE....hmmm at least i can get on the internet with IE Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008120122 Firefox/3.0.5 From URL: http://hendrix.mozilla.org/ Note to readers: Hendrix gives no expectation of a response to this fee...

Cast from type ''''DBNull'''' to type ''''String'''' is not valid.
How do I avoid getting this error: Cast from type ''''DBNull'''' to type ''''String'''' is not valid. I am trying to get values from the database into a form for updating using a Datareader, SQL is set to allow nulls for certain fields as they are not required but the only way I can get the form to display is by adding a space in SQL. Is there another way around this? Check if it is equal to DBNull.Value first and if it is, don't do the cast.Stanley Tan theSpoke Blog Where in the code does it need to go? I am using the following and it's the profile that isn't always requi...

table_info('','','','%') cannot return any types
I was recently confirming table_info special cases and discovered the case for getting table_types cannot work. table_info('','','','%') should return a list of table types but it returns a list of empty strings instead: my @types = $h->tables('', '', '', '%'); print "all types:\n", join("xxx\n", @types), "\n"; # should output something like: # "dbo" # "INFORMATION_SCHEMA" # "sys" # and actually outputs: xxx xxx It seems to be down to the following ...

'b'..'a'
Hello. I'm using defferent 5.6.0's for Win32. I wonder wheter following behaviour is intentional or not: d:\>perl -e "print 'b'..'c'" bc d:\>perl -e "print 'b'..'a'" bcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz I expected empty list in latter case, like in perl -e "print 'bb'..'a'" <!ENTITY Vadim REALLIFE "Vadim V.Konovalov, St.Petersburg, Russia"> &Vadim; On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 03:14:41PM +0400, Konovalov, Vadim wrote: > Hello. > > I'm using defferent 5.6.0'...

'IN' Clause or 'OR'
Hello, [1]: select * from TABLEA where COL1 IN('value1','value2''valu3'....) [2]:select * from TABLEA where COL1 = 'value1' OR COL1= 'value2' OR COL1='valu3'. TABLEA is a huge table and it has non-clustered index on COL1. Among the above 2 queries, which query will give me the better performance or fast response and WHY? What is the difference between 'IN' and 'OR' clauses as for as Sybase Optimization is concerned. Which is the better one to be used on huge tables. Thanks. Mac An IN list is treated ...

'or' or 'union'
Hello I was just wondering, in general what is better to use, an 'or' clause in a select or a 'union' to join two selects together. Do both statements create work tables? Many thanks Alex I think OR will be better than union. because suppose u have 3 tables and using OR u can join table a and table b and table c so each table will have only one read. but using union you will join table a and table b and in another query of union u will use table (a or b) and table c so ur one read is more in union . Ramdas Alex Cheung wrote: > Hello > >...

superreview granted: [Bug 430650] '^' and '=?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A8?=' chars don't work in password fields : [Attachment 318391] Patch v1.1
Masayuki Nakano (Mozilla Japan) <masayuki@d-toybox.com> has granted=20 superreview: Bug 430650: '^' and '=C2=A8' chars don't work in password fields https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D430650 Attachment 318391: Patch v1.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D318391&action=3Dedit ------- Additional Comments from Masayuki Nakano (Mozilla Japan) <masayuki@d-toybox.com> Thank you, Roc and Katakai-san.= ...

superreview granted: [Bug 430650] '^' and '=?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A8?=' chars don't work in password fields : [Attachment 317954] Patch v1.0
Robert O'Callahan (:roc) <roc@ocallahan.org> has granted Masayuki Nakano (Mozilla Japan) <masayuki@d-toybox.com>'s request for superreview: Bug 430650: '^' and '=C2=A8' chars don't work in password fields https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D430650 Attachment 317954: Patch v1.0 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D317954&action=3Dedit ------- Additional Comments from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) <roc@ocallahan.or= g> + if (aState =3D=3D mIMEData->mEnabled) {=0D mIMEData->mEnabled =3D aState;=0D =0D...

superreview requested: [Bug 430650] '^' and '=?UTF-8?Q?=C2=A8?=' chars don't work in password fields : [Attachment 317954] Patch v1.0
Masayuki Nakano (Mozilla Japan) <masayuki@d-toybox.com> has asked Robert O'Callahan (:roc) <roc@ocallahan.org> for superreview: Bug 430650: '^' and '=C2=A8' chars don't work in password fields https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D430650 Attachment 317954: Patch v1.0 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D317954&action=3Dedit ------- Additional Comments from Masayuki Nakano (Mozilla Japan) <masayuki@d-toybox.com> Katakai-san, please hurry up to review this, if you can.=0D =0D Roc: Would you r+sr for this? Even if we...

superreview cancelled: [Bug 228448] Remove '=='/'!=' 'PR_FALSE'/'PR_TRUE' : [Attachment 137404] (Av1) <nsInternetSearchService.cpp>
Alec Flett <alecf@flett.org> has cancelled Serge GAUTHERIE <gautheri@noos.fr>'s request for superreview: Bug 228448: Remove '=='/'!=' 'PR_FALSE'/'PR_TRUE' http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=228448 Attachment 137404: (Av1) <nsInternetSearchService.cpp> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=137404&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Alec Flett <alecf@flett.org> reviewers do not compile and test. Don't ask for a review until you've done that much yourself. ...

Web resources about - superreview canceled: [Bug 93725] 'bolder' and 'lighter' keywords of 'font-weight' don't work : [Attachment 323226] possible patch for this and #77882 - mozilla.dev.super-review

Resources last updated: 12/19/2015 2:34:13 PM