SeaMonkey 2.1 release candidate 1 available for OS/2
I've uploaded the first release candidate for the upcoming SeaMonkey
2.1. There were no OS/2 specific changes compared to the recently
published beta 3. However, it should contain cross-platform fixes for
bugs present in the beta.
You can get it from here:
Have fun, Walter
...SeaMonkey 1.1.18 vs SeaMonkey 2.1 (if/when 2.1 is released)
I will clearly state that I am not a computer whiz...thus, I have a
number of concerns regarding SeaMonkey 2.0 installation on my system.
I have been reading the many SeaMonkey 2.0 messages on this newsgroup
with some concern about my ability to fix the problems that could occur
with the installation of 2.0. It seems that the move from 1.1.18 to 2.0
is not happening without a number of glitches along the way. Thus, in
light of what I have read, I am wondering if it would wise for me to
wait for a future release of SeaMonkey before upgrading my system...I
suppose I am hoping tha...SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 2
SeaMonkey 2.1 Release Candidate 2 is now available for free download 
on the SeaMonkey website. We encourage testers to get involved  in
discussing and reporting problems as well as further improving the product.
SeaMonkey 2.1 RC 2 includes a total of 21 languages, including en-US and
brings our backend up to date with the latest Gecko (Firefox) releases.
(Two new languages over what was in 2.1 RC 1, namely en-GB and tr)
We have a targeted Release Date of June 10, 2011.
This release candidate fixes the issue of our default themes being
marked incompatible on first laun...SeaMonkey 2.2 #2
I have just re-installed 2.0.14 and it works a treat.
Don't mess with wot ain't broke.
...updated 1.2.2 to 2.0.1 but still shows 1.2.2
I just reinstalled the SBS 6 with the NW6 SP3 Overly cd and i put web
access, iprint, dhcp/dns, naas on the initial install. I then proceded to
upgrade edir to 8.7.1 ( i updated jvm and the other stuff that 8.7.1
required first) and everything went great. I then udated imanager from
1.2.2. to 2.0.1 and the install went as expected no errors or anything.
Here is the problem when i surf to iManager with internet exploder 6 it
shows me i am using 1.2.2. I read the instructions and they talk about some
migrating but the direction don't match imanager 1.2.2 (i assume they are
reffe...How to upgrade from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2?
I have 2.1.1 wokring fine and I have spent a lot of time making it just right but I want to make sure I have the latest & greatest so I am trying to get 2.1.2 to work so I can upgrade.
When I try to set-up 2.1.2 I get a few errors such as:
Could Not Load Skin: ~/Portals/_default/Skins/_default/admin.ascx Error: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.40607\Temporary ASP.NET Files\dnn212\295dc47c\1861dacc\3z6nxty1.0.vb(159): error BC30560: 'admin_ascx' is ambiguous in the namespace 'ASP'.
Is there a simple way to upgrade from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2?
Iff you have not made any cha...From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...Seamonkey 2.2 to 2.3.1 Fer it or Again it?
So I got 2.2, a huge disappointment with lots of annoying bugs in mail
and one big one in web (RMB context menu bug).
The new level of issues makes me scared to update, even though this is
the most buggy version of since perhaps Moz 0.6.
So what are the big new 2.3.1 issues that were not in 2.2? Should I be
scared or should I update? I have never had an update before 2.2 that I
questioned going back before.
> So I got 2.2, a huge disappointment with lots of annoying bugs in
> mail and one big one in web (RMB context menu bug). (...)
> So what ar...220.127.116.11/18.104.22.168 release update... respinning for 22.214.171.124 rc5, new target release date Tue. 2/27
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
A new blocker was discovered recently what will require a respin for
Bug 370521 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370521>
-- TextArea not firing onchange event (edit
was caused by the checkin for:
Bug 357684 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357684>
-- onchange on ...Firefox OS 2.1 and 2.2 developer release note drafts
Bhavana, Peter, and I have been working together to produce developer =
release notes for Firefox OS 2.1 and 2.2:
At this point, I think they are looking relatively complete, so I=E2=80=99=
d love to find some able volunteers from the engineering teams to review =
I doubt it will take too long to review the docs. The main areas of =
concern are the #Platform_changes_and_additions_in_detail sections. Just =
have a quick look for items that are r...Firefox 4.0 and SeaMonkey-2.1 Beta 3 for OS/2 released
Firefox-4.0 final is available at
The latest (and presumably last) Beta of SeaMonkey
Be sure to download and carefully _read_ the new Readmes
Two points ...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 2.22 (also 2.20.2 and 2.23.1)
The Bugzilla Project is proud to announce the official release of
Bugzilla 2.22. Bugzilla 2.22 is a major new feature release for
Bugzilla, containing a large number of bug fixes and enhancements,
including complete PostgreSQL support, UTF-8 support, user-impersonation
capabilities, and more.
You can see a description of all the new features in Bugzilla 2.22 at:
The Bugzilla Project is also releasing 2.20.2, a bug-fix release for the
2.20 branch recommended for all 2.20 branch users.
We also have a development snapshot, B...Firefox Release Candidate and Release Candidate 2 #2
Name: William E. Ward III
Summary: Firefox Release Candidate and Release Candidate 2
Browser is stable using 12 Tabs, no degrading of speed noticed.
Browser is noticeably faster than IE 7, Safari, and Firefox the older,
as Wall Street Journal's Walter Mossberg's 06/05/08 article reported.
Like the larger round "Go Back" key upper left corner.
Thank you for your excellent work.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9) Gecko/2008052906 Firefox/3.0
From URL: http://h...Version 2.1.1 to 2.1.2 upgrade
I upgraded from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2 last night.
In case anybody wants it, I created a ZIP file containing the changed RUNTIME files - all you need to do is extract and ftp over the top of your 2.1.1 install - assuming you've NOT MODIFIED anything yourself... ;)
Get the ZIP file here.
Hope someone finds it helpful.