Is dev-platform for platform users or platform developers?

So since dev-tech-xpcom closed, there's been an awful lot of traffic
on dev-platform from platform users.  I don't really have time to
read this, and it probably means I'll be paying less attention to
the platform developer traffic on dev-platform (if any at all; I'd
long since unsubscribed to dev-tech-xpcom until told to resubscribe
to follow the XPCOM memory management discussion).

Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
redirected elsewhere?

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
0
L
9/10/2007 11:45:24 PM
mozilla.dev.platform 6637 articles. 0 followers. Post Follow

11 Replies
1544 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 13

L. David Baron wrote:
> So since dev-tech-xpcom closed, there's been an awful lot of traffic
> on dev-platform from platform users.  I don't really have time to
> read this, and it probably means I'll be paying less attention to
> the platform developer traffic on dev-platform (if any at all; I'd
> long since unsubscribed to dev-tech-xpcom until told to resubscribe
> to follow the XPCOM memory management discussion).

I really object to m.d.t.xpcom being removed due to a bugzilla bug with 
too few parties cc'ed. I've reopened that bug and I am trying to get the 
group recreated.

> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
> redirected elsewhere?

The only sane answer is that this group is for platform developers, not 
users. That is, for those of us developing the Mozilla platform code.

/be
0
Brendan
9/11/2007 12:23:53 AM
L. David Baron wrote:
> So since dev-tech-xpcom closed, there's been an awful lot of traffic
> on dev-platform from platform users.  I don't really have time to
> read this, and it probably means I'll be paying less attention to
> the platform developer traffic on dev-platform (if any at all; I'd
> long since unsubscribed to dev-tech-xpcom until told to resubscribe
> to follow the XPCOM memory management discussion).
> 
> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
> redirected elsewhere?

I don't think we should be making blanket statements that md.platform is for
platform developers only... there's a lot of gray area between developers
and users. But we should definitely be pushing inexperienced questioners to
md.extensions or md.embedding.

--BDS
0
Benjamin
9/11/2007 1:55:04 AM
Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
> L. David Baron wrote:
>> So since dev-tech-xpcom closed, there's been an awful lot of traffic
>> on dev-platform from platform users.  I don't really have time to
>> read this, and it probably means I'll be paying less attention to
>> the platform developer traffic on dev-platform (if any at all; I'd
>> long since unsubscribed to dev-tech-xpcom until told to resubscribe
>> to follow the XPCOM memory management discussion).
>>
>> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
>> redirected elsewhere?
> 
> I don't think we should be making blanket statements that md.platform is for
> platform developers only... there's a lot of gray area between developers
> and users. But we should definitely be pushing inexperienced questioners to
> md.extensions or md.embedding.

I should point out that m.c.mozpad was set up exactly for this purpose 
(i.e. for developers who are using Mozilla platforms).

Matt
0
Matthew
9/11/2007 7:56:03 AM
Brendan Eich wrote:
> L. David Baron wrote:
>> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
>> redirected elsewhere?
> 
> The only sane answer is that this group is for platform developers, not 
> users. That is, for those of us developing the Mozilla platform code.

There are significant benefits to mixing platform users with developers. 
  First, interacting with developers is a great way for platform users 
to learn about the platform, and second, it provides a path to evolve 
those users into developers.

Nevertheless, mixing the groups isn't worth it if it costs us the 
participation of core platform hackers like dbaron and the transparency 
of public discussions on these topics.

So for key issues/technologies that require focused discussion between 
principals, we should set up public fora with restricted posting rights 
that we grant to those with the interest and aptitude for the subjects 
in question.

-myk
0
Myk
9/11/2007 8:03:05 AM
Myk Melez wrote on 11. Sep 2007

>>> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
>>> redirected elsewhere?
>> 
>> The only sane answer is that this group is for platform 
>> developers, not users. That is, for those of us developing 
>> the Mozilla platform code.
> 
> There are significant benefits to mixing platform users with 
> developers. First, interacting with developers is a great way 
> for platform users to learn about the platform, and second, it 
> provides a path to evolve those users into developers.

Platform users should not be encouraged to ask implementatio
questions in mdp, but I think their input and feedback is valuabl
if questions on platform enhancements and further platfor
development arise

> Nevertheless, mixing the groups isn't worth it if it costs us the 
> participation of core platform hackers like dbaron and the 
> transparency of public discussions on these topics.
> 
> So for key issues/technologies that require focused discussion 
> between principals, we should set up public fora with restricted 
> posting rights that we grant to those with the interest and 
> aptitude for the subjects in question.

I think that the openness of the current newsgroups is a ke
improvement over the old times, where many discussions took plac
on closed mailing lists and no communication was done betwee
public and private forums

In addition, every newsreader that I know of is able to ignore thread
and most user implementation questions are easily to identify b
looking at the subject line, so I don't think that having a fe
implementation questions here and there, requires too much effor
from the key platform developers

Cy
Simo

--
Calendar l10n coordinator
Calendar Website Maintainer: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar
Calendar developer blog:     http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/calendar
0
Simon
9/11/2007 9:49:39 AM
On Tuesday 2007-09-11 11:49 +0200, Simon Paquet wrote:
> In addition, every newsreader that I know of is able to ignore threads
> and most user implementation questions are easily to identify by
> looking at the subject line, so I don't think that having a few
> implementation questions here and there, requires too much effort
> from the key platform developers.

I get the groups that are important to me by email.  I have a
newsreader, and every few months I might remember to look at what's
going on in some of the other groups, but usually I don't look at
all.

Right now everything that doesn't arrive as email or RSS I will
stop looking at regularly when I'm busy, and maybe or maybe not
remember to start looking again when I become less busy.

-David

-- 
L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
0
L
9/11/2007 11:56:42 AM
On Sep 11, 1:03 am, Myk Melez <m...@mozilla.org> wrote:
> Brendan Eich wrote:
> > L. David Baron wrote:
> >> Does this discussion belong on dev-platform, or should it be
> >> redirected elsewhere?
>
> > The only sane answer is that this group is for platform developers, not
> > users. That is, for those of us developing the Mozilla platform code.
>
> There are significant benefits to mixing platform users with developers.

You're right, and I shouldn't have replied in haste. What I meant to
write was that we don't want users asking n00b or off-topic questions
repeatedly, drowning out the platform design discussions. The design
discussions are absolutely better with user as well as developer
feedback. No ivory-tower architecture. Benjamin made this point well,
and it applies to other groups already (e.g., mdt.js-engine).

With newsgroups there is no cure for off-topic posts. People need to
remind posters gently one on one, and perhaps with a regularly posted
message steering people to the right groups.

/be

0
brendan
9/11/2007 4:12:00 PM
L. David Baron wrote:
> I don't really have time to
> read this, and it probably means I'll be paying less attention to
> the platform developer traffic on dev-platform (if any at all; I'd
> long since unsubscribed to dev-tech-xpcom until told to resubscribe
> to follow the XPCOM memory management discussion).

For what it's worth, that's exactly the situation I'm in too (including 
unsubscribing and resubscribing).

-Boris

0
Boris
9/12/2007 3:53:38 PM
Just to follow up on this....  In the last three days, .platform has what look 
like 3 on-topic posts and 25 posts that don't really belong there.  In practice, 
when someone asks an extension development question people answer it instead of 
redirecting them to another newsgroup.

I'm pretty seriously considering unsubscribing from .platform (or rather 
switching to reading it via the newsreader once a month or so), because the 
noise-to-signal ratio makes it not worth trying to deal with on a daily basis.

-Boris

0
Boris
9/19/2007 3:42:11 PM
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 10:42:11 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:

> Just to follow up on this....  In the last three days, .platform has what look 
> like 3 on-topic posts and 25 posts that don't really belong there.  In practice, 
> when someone asks an extension development question people answer it instead of 
> redirecting them to another newsgroup.

That's because m.d.t.xpcom was closed and people posting questions there
were officially redirected /here/.

> I'm pretty seriously considering unsubscribing from .platform (or rather 
> switching to reading it via the newsreader once a month or so), because the 
> noise-to-signal ratio makes it not worth trying to deal with on a daily basis.

Well this wouldn't have happened if m.d.t.xpcom wasn't closed, in the
middle of an on topic thread even! (there is a bug to reopen it so you
could consider voting for it).

Phil

-- 
Philip Chee <philip@aleytys.pc.my>, <philip.chee@gmail.com>
http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org
Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief,
oh Night, and so be good for us to pass.
[ ]Don't hit me, Mr. Moderator...I'll get back on topic now!
* TagZilla 0.066.6

0
Philip
9/20/2007 5:28:12 PM
Philip Chee wrote:
> Well this wouldn't have happened if m.d.t.xpcom wasn't closed, in the
> middle of an on topic thread even! (there is a bug to reopen it so you
> could consider voting for it).

The bug is 385041 <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385041>, 
and the newsgroup is mostly back already (except that you can't yet post 
to it from Google Groups).

-myk
0
Myk
9/20/2007 10:37:29 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

platform
Does Power Designer (Physical Architect) run on OS-X? Thanks No. PowerDesigner is a Windows product. Please submit an enhancement request to Sybase, asking for additional platforms. I would love to see a PowerDesigner-Linux. -- Mike Nicewarner [TeamSybase] http://www.datamodel.org mike@nospam!datamodel.org Sybase product enhancement requests: http://www.isug.com/cgi-bin/ISUG2/submit_enhancement "Mike Connell" <mikeconnell@prodigy.net> wrote in message news:40e116b6@forums-1-dub... > Does Power Designer (Physical Architect) run on OS-X? > > ...

PLATFORM
Builds, all tests (that aren't skipped) succeed on FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT on i386. I think this gives a PLATFORMS line of: freebsd5.2-i386 Y Y Y ? ? Y Y How do I verify which runloops/features are working? --kag myconfig: Summary of my parrot 0.0.13 configuration: configdate='Fri Feb 27 15:49:20 2004' Platform: osname=freebsd, archname=i386-freebsd jitcapable=1, jitarchname=i386-freebsd, jitosname=FREEBSD, jitcpuarch=i386 execcapable=1 perl=perl Compiler: cc='cc', ccflags='-DAPPLLIB_E...

PLATForm
Hi, I am just moving to Windows8 and receive the message below. Where do I put the Platform variable? I am sure I never heard of it before. .. wHER DO I WRITE wIN64? Checking project dependencies... Compiling gamma.cbproj (Debug, Win32) [Error Error] Invalid PLATFORM variable "HPD". PLATFORM must be one of the following: "Win32", "Win64", or "OSX32". If PLATFORM is defined by your system's environment, it must be overridden in the RAD Studio IDE or passed explicitly on the command line to MSBuild; e.g., /p:Platform=Win32. ...

Merging dev-tech-layout into dev-platform
Today I found out that I had missed a post from David Baron on dev-tech-layout, because I had no idea that this list exists. I think dev-platform is a better place to have the conversation related to the layout module (people are already having discussions about other modules over there). Does anybody have any objections? Cheers, Ehsan ...

Merging dev-tech-layout into dev-platform
Today I found out that I had missed a post from David Baron on dev-tech-layout, because I had no idea that this list exists. I think dev-platform is a better place to have the conversation related to the layout module (people are already having discussions about other modules over there). Does anybody have any objections? Cheers, Ehsan ...

Running SSIS package developed in 32 Bit Platform to 64 bit Platform.
Componets for SSIS package I used are as follows: 1) SQL Server 2005 2) SSIS in Visual studio 2005 3) Excel File as Input. I have devloped SSIS application on Windows XP which is an 32 bit Application but client also want that package on 64 bit Platform. I dont have 64 bit platform hence I am not sure whether that package will run on 64 bit. Will you help me out for whether this package will be run on 64 bit platform?  Sachin KaleJunior Developer,C# & BI Developer Hi, The 64-bit editions of Microsoft SQL Server include Integration Services, but some Integrat...

Consolidating dev-webapi into dev-platform after Friday (2015-06-19)
Unless you have serious objections, I'm going to request that dev-webapi redirects to dev-platform as of this coming Saturday at 00:00. A few people have pointed out that having the split mailing list is causing confusion about where to send emails and the traffic level doesn't seem to me to justify its continued existence. ...

Platforms
Is web.pb for Netscape servers available for other platforms than NT. We have a customer who is running his web server on AIX, and would like to integrate it with PB. We have done it on NT, but I havent found anything on other platforms. Geir Seim Allianse informasjonssystemer A/S Web.PB is supported on HP/UX 10.x, IBM AI/X 4.15 and Solaris 2.5.x with PB 6.0 and Solaris was also supported on PB 5.0.3. This will require a copy of PB for Unix. ...

Platforms
Can anybody point me to a page on the Sybase web site which identifies certified platforms for PB? In particular, I'm looking for information on using XP as a client. Has anybody tried it? Thanks! -- Have a great day! Jeff Jeffrey R. Garbus Soaring Eagle Consulting, Ltd. www.soaringeagleltd.com 888 289 8170 XP is not a supported OS for any Sybase product at this point. I expect Sybase will begin certifying its products, specifically, PowerBuilder and EASErver, on XP in the near future. -- <hopethishelps /> Roy Kiesler [TeamSybase] mySybase -- ht...

Which platforms?
I can't find anything at Sybase that tells me on which platforms I can run a PB 8 client application? Can anyone point me to some Sybase documentation that states this? Thanks. This has the information you require. http://download.sybase.com/pdfdocs/pbg0800e/pbeinst.pdf /ck <Ben> wrote in message news:815F3F9B29FB7EED003E605785256AD9.003E606485256AD9@webforums... > I can't find anything at Sybase that tells me on which platforms I can run > a PB 8 client application? Can anyone point me to some Sybase documentation > that states this? Thanks. Th...

other platforms
I know that many have wanted Delphi for other platforms. But for any one that CG supports, there are several left out in the cold. It seems like what is needed is a runtime that goes across platforms. .NET promised to be that, but we know how far that got. Is FLEX the answer? http://dobbscodetalk.com/index.php?option=com_myblog&show=Flex-the-interface.html&Itemid=29 98%! of browsers have Flash loaded. Silverlight can only dream. Delphi could support this one platform and an app could easily run on all machines and browsers that have Flash loaded. Reminds me of th...

Platforms
I've been very happy using SeaMonkey on my Windows based machines for years. Now I've obtained a smart phone, primarily for internet access using 3G or 4G when I am traveling. It runs on Android. The clerk at the store said it would run any browser, but when I went to the SeaMonkey site, I could find only versions for windows or linux. Is there some way I can get this phone to run SeaMonkey? They keep talking about Apps, but as I have aged I have not kept up with technology, and don't even know what those are. Interviewed by CNN on 17/10/2012 16:15, Not@home to...

Which platforms?
Sybase literature proudly boasts that EAServer works on NT, Sun Solaris, HP UX and IBM AIX, but I can't find anything that says which of these is possible if you're using PB (version 8) components. Can anyone tell me or, better, point me to a Sybase document which I can quote? ...

Platforms?
Don't get me wrong; I think that SpamExam is a great product for the single end-user. However, from what I've read, this technology could be even more useful to corporations, and has the potential of putting some other companies out of business. If one user can create a 99.99% accurate scanning tool for his/her personal benefit, wouldn't a corporation be benefitted by the same tool at the server level? I currently have to personally, manually handle all the messages that trigger my RBL and content filters because of the high rate of false positives. Once SpamExam is fu...

Web resources about - Is dev-platform for platform users or platform developers? - mozilla.dev.platform

Windows Platform Dev (@wpdev) on Twitter
Log in Sign up You are on Twitter Mobile because you are using an old version of Internet Explorer. Learn more here Windows Platform Dev @ wpdev ...

DailyTech - Xbox One Titles Confirmed, Indie Dev Platform Unveiled
Microsoft tries to stoke sales of its upcoming console

Study Sees Strong HTML5 Growth as Dev Platform
A new survey from industry research firm Strategy Analytics shows that HTML5 has the strongest predicted growth among developer platforms.

SmartThings hires ex-Googler to manage dev platform
... Samsung's hope for a unified smart home platform, has hired Dora Hsu, a former Google executive, as chief platform officer to lead its developer ...

Rhomobile upgrades smartphone dev platform
Rhodes 1.4 adds capabilities for BlackBerry and a screen size API

DreamFactory Adds IBM DB2 Support to Its App Dev Platform
DreamFactory Software has extended the reach of its open source application development platform to include support for IBM DB2 databases.

Meerkat’s Dev platform, APIs may give it edge over Periscope
... even going to rely on Facebook to get them back to the promised land of live-streaming favor. Instead, Meerkat is launching a Developer platform ...

Afero Is An IoT Dev Platform Play Built By Danger Co-Founder Joe Britt
Remember Danger? The mobile maker Microsoft acquired for $500 million back in 2008 in the hopes of firing up its mobile fortunes? Things didn't ...

Techmeme: Windows Phone adds multitasking, deeper OS integration, and sensor access to dev platform (Myriam ...
The web's technology news site of record, Techmeme spotlights the hottest tech stories from all around the web on a single page.

IP Prototyping Kit for PCIe 3.0 Dual Mode Controller, Root Complex Mode w/ARC SW Dev. Platform
The DesignWare IP Prototyping Kits provide the essential hardware and software elements needed to reduce IP prototyping and integration effort ...

Resources last updated: 1/16/2016 3:17:55 PM