Dropping 1.9.2, Going 1.9.3 for SeaMonkey 2.1
here in the groups/lists]
I blogged on SeaMonkey 2.1 planning earlier in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-01/seamonkey_2_1_planning and also about
the fact that we have been unsure if we should go 1.9.2 or 1.9.3 in
terms of the platform there.
I sent mails to the SeaMonkey Council and a few quite active developers
in the last days, and asked for opinions on dropping support for 1.9.2
and going for firmly basing SeaMonkey 2.1 on Mozilla platform 1.9.3 instead.
Nobody was really against th...SeaMonkey 1.1.18 vs SeaMonkey 2.1 (if/when 2.1 is released)
I will clearly state that I am not a computer whiz...thus, I have a
number of concerns regarding SeaMonkey 2.0 installation on my system.
I have been reading the many SeaMonkey 2.0 messages on this newsgroup
with some concern about my ability to fix the problems that could occur
with the installation of 2.0. It seems that the move from 1.1.18 to 2.0
is not happening without a number of glitches along the way. Thus, in
light of what I have read, I am wondering if it would wise for me to
wait for a future release of SeaMonkey before upgrading my system...I
suppose I am hoping tha...From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...SeaMonkey 1.0.9 and 1.1.2 he-IL
now that i have a job, i have very little time left for the l10n work.
so these came out a little later than they should have.
the language packs should be used with their respective RTL themes,
Mozilla Hebrew L10n team
Tsahi Asher wrote:
> now that i have a job, i have very little time left for the l10n work.
> so these came out a little later than they should have.
> language pack:
> language pack:
> the language packs should be used with their respective RTL themes,
> released earlier.
> Tsahi A...SeaMonkey 1.0.9 and 1.1.2 in italian
since kairo said we can start making builds based on the latest
candidates, here there are the italian ones. If there'll be problem with
the candidates, i'll make them again.
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/mozilla-italia/seamonkey-1.0.9.it-IT.win32.i...SeaMonkey 1.1.2/1.0.9 soon?
MoCo will release Firefox 22.214.171.124/126.96.36.199 soon:
Are there any plans to have a SM 1.1.2/1.0.9 at the same time?
Adrian (Adrianer) Kalla schrieb:
> MoCo will release Firefox 188.8.131.52/184.108.40.206 soon:
> Are there any plans to have a SM 1.1.2/1.0.9 at the same time?
Not yet. We are looking closely at what patches will be included there,
but I currently see no immediate reason why we need t...SeaMonkey 1.0.9 and 1.1.2 upcoming
I'd like to give you a notice of our upcoming SeaMonkey 1.0.9 and 1.1.2
Both are planned to go public in sync with the Firefox updates currently
scheduled for next week, see their schedule at
Our candidate builds for those releases are here:
From QA up till now, we believe that builds in those directories are
ready to go final unchanged, so you shou...SeaMonkey 1.0.9 and 1.1.2 in Brazilian Portuguese
for the first time we've completed the job and we're releasing the first
The language packs and builds are here:
and the langpacks are alternatively here:
> for the first time we've completed the job and we're releasing the first
> pt-BR version.
Always nice to see new L10n version appear :)
> The language packs and builds are here:
> http://s...Thoughs on 1.9, 1.9.1, and 2
One of the common discussions that seems to come up often is what
happens when 1.9 is done: do we go full-bore on 2? Do we plan for an
interim release? Do we have a way of fixing small polish/regression
bugs that we weren't able to get to 1.9 before the next major release?
The main thing I'll assert here is that I think it is vitally
important that the entire engineering team commits fully to work that
will benefit whatever initial release "Mozilla 2" becomes: being able
to make API-breaking changes, architectural improvements, potentially
doing some of the large ...Important App Update changes on the 1.9.1 and 1.9.2 branches
The value for the %BUILD_TARGET% parameter of the app.update.url
preference is changing for Mac OS X Universal builds on the Mozilla
1.9.1 and 1.9.2 stable branches and should land for 220.127.116.11 and
18.104.22.168 releases unless an unforeseen issue comes up.
Previously the value was always Darwin_Universal-gcc3 which doesn't
distinguish which architecture the application is running on. The value
will be Darwin_ppc-gcc3-u-ppc-i386 for Universal builds using the PPC
architecture and Darwin_x86-gcc3-u-ppc-i386 for Universal builds using
the i386 architecture. This is necessary to d...selecting ? selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6. is slow (1-3 second) then selecting of 7.,8.,9. go on is so fast (0.1 second or more fast).. how can i get fast for selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6
selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4.(sometime even 5., 6.) is slow (1-3 second) then selecting of 7.,8.,9.(sometimes 5., 6.,) go on is so fast (0.1 second or more fast).. how can i get fast for selecting of 1., 2. , 3., 4., 5., 6. is slow ?? recordcount is almost 1.050.000.. i do selecting 1.2.3. go on same page with treeview1.. treeview1 in masterpage.master..
gridview1 and datasource1 are in pagelist.aspx (it connets datasource1)..productnumber is primarykey for index.. kategori, kategori1 and kategori2, price, datemin are index from keys/index in table1 (right clicking menu)....SeaMonkey 1.1.2 and 1.0.9 es-ES binaries and XPIs
We've got ready binaries and updated XPIs for both SeaMonkey 1.1.2 and
* Win32 (11525242 bytes, MD5: 14cf01788adb2f8b9b6979d77397b45f)
* Linux (15332421 bytes, MD5: c0a4926f2f3c10ee448bffdf743304f2)
* Langpack (745765 bytes, MD5: e13ac911179b048a3ff57ececc038b89)
http://descargas.proyectonave.es/productos/seamonke...Merging of 1.9.1 to 1.9.2 done
I just finished merging a whole ton of locales from 1.9.1 via
l10n-central to 1.9.2.
I only touched those locales that didn't work on central nor 1.9.2
outside of 1.9.1. That is, if there were commits on central, I usually
didn't merge that over.
If you think that you can benefit from getting 1.9.1 content over, get
in touch with me or someone else from the l10n-drivers team and we'll
try to help you with more attention to detail. In particular, we'd need
to know what of central to keep, and what of 1.9.1 to use.
...Some bugs: SeaMonkey 1.1.9 #2
Sites get displayed in long lines.
It still happens with Seamonkey 1.1.9 and used to be only on ebay now
also happens on CNN with 1.1.9
What is the reason as this bug seemingly is not fixed.
Here is a screenshot
> Sites get displayed in long lines.
What do you mean by "long lines"?? Your screen shot looks o.k. to me!
> It still happens with Seamonkey 1.1.9 and used to be only on ebay now
> also happens on CNN with 1.1.9
> What is the reason as this bug seemingl...1.9.1 and 1.9.2 unit tests on minis
I have enabled unit tests on the minis for the Fedora and OSX machines
(only 32-bit plaforms).
Once I see enough activity I will be disabling them from running on the
builders side .
As we improve our infrastructure we will enable more and more branches
and disabling more and more of them from the builders side and therefore
reduce the load on that side.
Let me know if you have any questions,
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Are...examples of l10n updates on 1.9.1, 1.9.2
following up on the discussion on the delivery call, here's a list of
changes that I think we should take as minor updates. They're a bit more
content-ish on 1.9.2 thanks to lorentz strings.
I hope the links make it allright, there should be one per line, 8 for
3.5 and 12 for 3.6.
A bit on reading those diffs:
It only offers rich content for things it knows about. I.e., not for
dictionaries or README.txt. For dictionaries, that's a feature because
those diffs are huge quite often. README.txt wasn't important enough so
far for me to hook up revisi...Same profile in Seamonkey 2.4.1 and Seamonkey 2.6.1 ?
I will switch a computer from windows to linux and from Seamonkey 2.6.1
to Seamonkey 2.4.1 (I don't know why Ubuntu only have 2.6.1 on Precise
I think there no big differences between these two releases that will
bring bug into profile. Am I false?
On my computer I directly use Seamonkey from Mozilla, on that computer I
don't want to have work, so I only keep Ubuntu repositories.
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
St�phane Gr�goire wrote:
> I will switch a computer from windows to linux and...Heads up, the next Firefox 3.6.x platform version is 22.214.171.124 instead of 126.96.36.199
It was suggested in a bug I mention this to the list...
Firefox 3.6.4 has a platform version of 188.8.131.52. The version number =
184.108.40.206 is currently being used by Fennec. We=92ll be taking fixes above =
and beyond that version, so the next platform version Firefox will use =
will be named 220.127.116.11. We will keep the version numbers coherent by =
naming it Firefox 3.6.6 (essentially skipping over 3.6.5).
I will be moving the blocking flags and status flags as appropriate, so =
if you see activity in bugs don=92t worry. Also, If you have approvals =
for 18.104.22.168 they are now for 22.214.171.124 (...Xulrunner 126.96.36.199 vs Xulrunner 1.9.2
I must say, after having a few good months playing with xulrunner
1.9.2, that it is in many ways less stable than 188.8.131.52 which is a
shame. I've tried pretty much everything to stabilise the platform,
primarily by optimising my code, but it is just pointless. I am
switching back to 184.108.40.206.
Is there any reason why Xulrunner 1.9.2 is so crashy?
On 6/3/10 1:28 PM, <i>bebo</i> wrote:
> I must say, after having a few good months playing with xulrunner
> 1.9.2, that it is in many ways less stable than 220.127.116.11 which is a
> shame. I've tried pretty much everyt...Restricting the 1.9.2 tree leading up to 1.9.1 freezes?
The 1.9.1 branch will be freezing in a few days for FF3.1 Beta 3. This
will be the first freeze since branching 1.9.1 from trunk, and is also
(afaik) the first freeze where we've had two development trees (1.9.1,
1.9.2) in addition to a normal public release branch (1.9.0).
Seeing as there is still a significant volume of work happening on 1.9.1
-- all of which must land on 1.9.2 first -- would it make sense to
restrict checkins on 1.9.2 in the days leading up to the freeze?
The risk is that if the 1.9.2 tree is in a bad state, we're effectively
blocked from landing o...SeaMonkey 1.1.1 and 1.0.8 he-IL #2
Hebrew SeaMonkey 1.1.1 and 1.0.8 win32 installer and langpack are now
1.1.1 win32 installer:
1.0.8 win32 installer:
the language packs should be used with the...How to upgrade from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2?
I have 2.1.1 wokring fine and I have spent a lot of time making it just right but I want to make sure I have the latest & greatest so I am trying to get 2.1.2 to work so I can upgrade.
When I try to set-up 2.1.2 I get a few errors such as:
Could Not Load Skin: ~/Portals/_default/Skins/_default/admin.ascx Error: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.40607\Temporary ASP.NET Files\dnn212\295dc47c\1861dacc\3z6nxty1.0.vb(159): error BC30560: 'admin_ascx' is ambiguous in the namespace 'ASP'.
Is there a simple way to upgrade from 2.1.1 to 2.1.2?
Iff you have not made any cha...Bug 378409
Bug 378409 - Update ChatZilla version from 0.9.75.1 to 0.9.78.1 for SM
has been Released into the Wild, Wild World Wide Web (...WWWWW.
> Bug 378409 - Update ChatZilla version from 0.9.75.1 to 0.9.78.1 for SM
> has been Released into the Wild, Wild World Wide Web (...WWWWW.
> 378409.Bug.Bugzilla.Mozilla.Org/Print :).
Sorry, this won't be done. No new ...SeaMonkey 1.1.9 sv-SE ready #2
Here are the Swedish SeaMonkey 1.1.9 (sv-SE) files:
MLP staff: Please upload these to ftp.mozilla.org. Thank you.
Cheers /Lars P M
Mozilla released Firefox 9.0 and 9.0.1 within a day of each other. Will
there be a SeaMonkey 2.6.1 forthcoming as a result?
Firefox, as of this hour, has not yet updated their Release Notes page
to reflect 9.0.1.
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 111222-0, 12/22/2011
Tested on: 12/22/2011 9:37:11 AM
avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2011 AVAST Software.
> Mozilla released Firefox 9.0 and 9.0.1 within a day of each other. Will
> there be a SeaMonkey 2.6.1 forthcoming as a result?