New Mozilla Seamonkey Web Browser 2.3
default wrote :
Thanks for the info. It's been a long time since I used this one,
think I'll give it another whirl! ;-)
"Ladies, leave your clothes here and spend the afternoon having a good
time." -- A sign in a laundry in Rome.
> default wrote :
> Thanks for the info. It's been a long time since I used this one,
> think I'll give it another whirl! ;-)
...From 3.3.4 to 3.2.3
I have done an upgrade from 3.2.3 to 3.3.4. Installing new needed
components like Digest::SHA.
It works fine and all data are migrated in the MySql database. I moved
the data directory and localconfig-file.
I then tried to go back to 3.2.3 (just to check that would be posiible
if something would go wrong when I upgrade the real server...). Same
localconfig file and data-directory, I run checksetup.pl again without
problem, but when accessing bugzilla page I get:
Bugzilla has suffered an internal error.
Template->process() fail...I ran CVS update from 3.2.3 to 3.2.4, but still display 3.2.3
On Windows Server with Bugzilla 3.2.3 I ran:
cvs update -R -d -rBugzilla_Stable
I thought I was updating to 3.2.4. When I log in, I still see 3.2.3.
Did I do something incorrectly?
Have you run checksetup.pl since the cvs update command? This is
- Brian Small
On Behalf Of Yuri Ivanov
Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 10:31 AM
Subject: I ran...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 3.2.2, 3.0.8, and 3.3.3
Bugzilla 3.2.1, 3.0.7, and 3.3.2 contained a bug that was critical
for any installation running under mod_perl, due to an unintentional
interaction between the various security fixes in those releases. We
are releasing three new releases today to fix the critical issue:
3.2.2, 3.0.8, and 3.3.3. They are identical to the previous release
except that they have this one fix for installations running under
Bugzilla is available at:
Details of the fix are in the Security Adviso...error after upgrading Bugzilla from 3.2.2 to 3.2.3
I have two Windows Server 2003 machines running Bugzilla 3.2.2 +
Testopia 2.2, one is production and the other is for test, both have
same configuration. I tried to upgrade it with patch file
bugzilla-3.2.2-to-3.2.3.diff.gz, and my steps are:
1) Shut down your Bugzilla installation by putting some HTML or text
in the shutdownhtml parameter
2) untar the .diff file and use unix2dos.exe to replace Unix line
feed characters with Windows carriage returns
3) run the command: path -p1 < bugzilla-3.2.2-to-3.2.3.diff
4) run the command: perl checksetup.pl
5) remove the text of shut...Upgrade 3.2.3 to 3.2.5
I upgrade from 3.2.3 to 3.2.5 on my test server and everything worked
OK, I'm trying to upgrade my production server and I'm having problems
with my checksetup.pl and the template toolkit.
The checksetup.pl is telling me that I have template-toolkit 2.20 and
bugzilla requires 2.22.
Checking for Template-Toolkit (v2.22) found v2.20
But if I open ppm, I do have 2.22 installed. I uninstall and reinstall
the package but I still have the problems. I can not reboot the server
right now but I'm going to do it at 5:00am to see if this solve the
Do you ...Mozilla Seamonkey 2.3.2
...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 3.2.8, 3.4.8, 3.6.2, and 3.7.3
Today we have four new releases. One new development snapshot
(3.7.3), one new stable release (3.6.2) and two security updates
for the old stable releases (3.4.8 and 3.2.8).
Bugzilla 3.6.2 is our latest stable release. It contains various
useful bug fixes and security improvements for the 3.6 branch.
Bugzilla 3.4.8 and 3.2.8 are security updates for the 3.4
branch and the 3.2 branch, respectively.
Bugzilla 3.7.3 is our third unstable development release leading to
Bugzilla 4.0. We have done a fair amount of QA on this release.
However, QA found many bugs that have not ye...Security Advisory for Bugzilla 3.0.3, 3.1.3, 2.22.3, and 2.20.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Bugzilla is a Web-based bug-tracking system, used by a large number of
This advisory covers three security issues that have recently been
fixed in the Bugzilla code:
* Users without the "canconfirm" privilege could enter a bug as NEW
or ASSIGNED by using the XML-RPC interface.
* When viewing several bugs at once, there was a Cross-Site Scripting
* The inbound email interface allowed you t...[ANN] Release of Bugzilla 3.2.1, 3.0.7, 2.22.7, and 3.3.2
Today we have some major security improvements for Bugzilla in the
form of four releases. We strongly recommend that all Bugzilla
administrators read the Security Advisory for these releases, which is
linked below in this email.
Bugzilla 3.2.1 is our latest stable release. It contains various
useful bug fixes in addition to major security improvements.
Bugzilla 3.0.7 and Bugzilla 2.22.7 are security updates for their
Bugzilla 3.3.2 is an unstable development release. In addition to the
security fixes that all the other releases contain, this release
contains n...[ANN] Security Advisory for Bugzilla 3.2.8, 3.4.8, 3.6.2, and 3.7.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bugzilla is a Web-based bug-tracking system used by a large number of
software projects. The following security issues have been discovered
* There is a way to inject both headers and content to users, causing
a serious Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability.
* It was possible to see graphs from Old Charts even if you did not
have access to a particular product, and you could browse a
particular URL to see all product names.
* YUI 2.8.1, which shipped with Bugzilla starting with 3.7.x,
contain...Seamonkey 2.2-2.3.3 Individual History Item Will No Longer Delete :-(
I upgraded one of my installations of Seamonkey 2.0.14 to 2.2. Once I
had upgraded I noticed I was unable to delete history item in the
history window. I can however delete *.domain.com or www.doamin.com. I
figured this would have been fixed in a later Seamonkey update. But
after two or three more updates the problem continues. This happens on
clean installs as well as upgraded installations. Developers: Please
fix! I make heavy use of my history.
Bug 672429 - Deleting Browser History (Ctrl+H) is Fubar'd, Deleting
Far More then Wanted
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=...From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...Bugzilla Upgrade
Hi Support Team,
I plan to upgrade from Bugzilla 3.0.3 to 3.2.2 .
Our bugzilla setup has a lot of "Custom fileds" .=20
I went thro' the upgrade notes but that does not explicitly=20
mention about the steps that I need to follow with "Custom Fields".=20
Do I need to copy some files from template/en/custom to the new location
Please let me know the steps that I need to follow for the upgrade with
Thanks for your help!