Mozilla Seamonkey Web Browser 2.4.1
...Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.10.1 Web Browser
New SeaMonkey 2.10.1
...SeaMonkey 1.1.18 vs SeaMonkey 2.1 (if/when 2.1 is released)
I will clearly state that I am not a computer whiz...thus, I have a
number of concerns regarding SeaMonkey 2.0 installation on my system.
I have been reading the many SeaMonkey 2.0 messages on this newsgroup
with some concern about my ability to fix the problems that could occur
with the installation of 2.0. It seems that the move from 1.1.18 to 2.0
is not happening without a number of glitches along the way. Thus, in
light of what I have read, I am wondering if it would wise for me to
wait for a future release of SeaMonkey before upgrading my system...I
suppose I am hoping that some changes will be incorporated into a future
upgrade, that would make the move go more smoothly. Any comments would
Also, a list of actions to take, or not to take, during the
installation of 2.0 would also be very helpful...just in case I get
brave enough to proceed with the 2.0 installation.
Windows XP Pro SP3
I have always allowed previous SeaMonkey installations to be loaded
using default locations. I suppose that I do have concerns about what
happens to the plug I have downloaded.
I only have one profile on my system.
> I will clearly state that I am not a computer whiz...thus, I have a
> number of concerns regarding SeaMonkey 2.0 installation on my system.
> I have been reading the many SeaMonkey 2.0 messages on this newsgroup
> with some concern about my ability to fix the problems...Seamonkey web browser 2.14.1
...Mozilla SeaMonkey 2.3.3 Web Browser
...New Mozilla Seamonkey Web Browser 2.3
default wrote :
Thanks for the info. It's been a long time since I used this one,
think I'll give it another whirl! ;-)
"Ladies, leave your clothes here and spend the afternoon having a good
time." -- A sign in a laundry in Rome.
> default wrote :
> Thanks for the info. It's been a long time since I used this one,
> think I'll give it another whirl! ;-)
...New Mozilla Seamonkey Web Browser 2.09
Security, stability, and lots of bug fixes.
> Security, stability, and lots of bug fixes.
2.0.10 is out.
A Security fix.
"Ed" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message news:email@example.com...
> default wrote:
>> Security, stability, and lots of ...Seamonkey Web Browser 2.2
...[ANNOUNCE] l10n-mozilla-2.0 open for business for SeaMonkey 2.1, and Firefox 4.0.1
the http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/l10n-mozilla-2.0/ repositories are
now open for business.
Please land everything you want to ship in SeaMonkey 2.1 and Firefox
4.0.1 on that repository.
Probably something similar applies for Thunderbird.
SeaMonkey 2.1 should be good for sign-offs, I'll wrap up Firefox 4.0x
tomorrow when I'm awake.
I did not go into the business of mass porting content from central to
2.0, so please make sure that you really have the contents in that
repository that you're looking for.
If there are changesets to suite, editor/ui...downloads for mozilla browser 1.2.1
Name: beth lancaster
Summary: downloads for mozilla browser 1.2.1
i need a browser download for my os 9.1 preferably mozilla 1.2.1
Browser Details: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.14; Mac_PowerPC)
...Same profile in Seamonkey 2.4.1 and Seamonkey 2.6.1 ?
I will switch a computer from windows to linux and from Seamonkey 2.6.1
to Seamonkey 2.4.1 (I don't know why Ubuntu only have 2.6.1 on Precise
I think there no big differences between these two releases that will
bring bug into profile. Am I false?
On my computer I directly use Seamonkey from Mozilla, on that computer I
don't want to have work, so I only keep Ubuntu repositories.
Sorry for possible mistakes in English!
St�phane Gr�goire wrote:
> I will switch a computer from windows to linux and...SeaMonkey 1.1.2
My problem just started up a few days ago and it originated when I was
using v 1.1.1 and then upgraded to 1.1.2 and the problem persists
Seems as if there has developed a full 2 second and almost 3 second
delay when I click on the "X" in the top right corner to close a window
(the problem is there also when I go to "File -- Close"). If I have four
or five windows open it gets confusing because I've click on the first
window and "thought" I missed the "X" and clicked again only to have the
window behind also close after the delay.
I got those traps when trying to 'Edit as new'(?) a previous sent mail and
wanted to change the language via right click in subject line. Was reproduce
able a few times but now it works. Maybe I tried to fast switching spell checker?
12-06-2011 21:37:47 SYS3171 PID 006e TID 0001 Slot 0077
P1=00000002 P2=0002fffc P3=XXXXXXXX P4=XXXXXXXX
EAX=00030064 EBX=00030180 ECX=00030180 EDX=27a22940
DS=0053 DSACC=f0f3 DSLIM=ffffffff
ES=0053...Mozilla 1.2.1 for Linux Advanced Server 2.1
Can I know from where can I download mozilla browser v 1.2.1 which is
compatible in Redhat Enterprise Linux Advanced Server 2.1? I searched
the mozilla.org site but I could not find anything specific to Advnced
server. Is the RH 7 or RH 8 versions compatible??
> Can I know from where can I download mozilla browser v 1.2.1 which is
> compatible in Redhat Enterprise Linux Advanced Server 2.1? I searched
> the mozilla.org site but I could not find anything specific to Advnced
> server. Is the RH 7 or RH 8 versions compa...SeaMonkey 2.1
An increasing number of features are diverging between Gecko 1.9.2 and
Gecko 1.9.3; this gives us a number of options, with pros and cons for
each, but please don't consider this an exhaustive list.
1. Stick with 1.9.2 for now, don't use 1.9.3 features at all
* Pro: We know what features we have to port
* Con: Lots of catching up on trunk after comm-central
forks/after releasing 2.1
2. Write code using feature detection for 1.9.3/backward
compatibility for 1.9.2
* Pro: More flexible than any other option
* Con: Some 1.9.3 features can't easily be used compatibly
3. Stick with 1.9.3 for now, people can try building against 1.9.2
but some features might not work; drop 1.9.2 after comm-central
forks (anyone desperately interested could potentially back out
the 1.9.3 specific code on the branch)
* Pro: Thunderbird needs to be 1.9.2-compatible anyway
* Con: 1.9.2 not officially supported or unsupported
4. Drop 1.9.2 now; don't accept code using feature detection or
* Pro: Our best chance of catching up with Firefox 3.7
* Con: No going back
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
> An increasing number of features are diverging between Gecko 1.9.2 and
> Gecko 1.9.3; this gives us a number of options, with pros and cons for
> each, but please don't consider this a...Seamonkey 2.1 and Seamonkey 2.0
I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launch
Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookmarks.
How fixing it?
Seamonkey 2.1b3pre mail window look very pretty!
Sorry for my bad english, the british dictionnary is disabled by nightly
build and I don't speak english fluently.
St=E9phane Gr=E9goire schrieb:
> I'm using Seamonkey 2.1 nightly builds but sometimes by mistake I launc=
> Seamonkey 2.0 and then in Seamonkey 2.1 I have not history and no bookm=
ark...News Reader SeaMonkey 2.32 beta 1 & 2
What is wrong with news reader in SeaMonkey beta 2.32?
It cannot find any new articles for any news group.
Ran with all Add-on off in safe mode, same problem.
Anyone else having this problem?
On 12/19/2014 03:41 PM, George wrote:
> What is wrong with news reader in SeaMonkey beta 2.32?
> It cannot find any new articles for any news group.
> Ran with all Add-on off in safe mode, same problem.
> Anyone else having this problem?
Switch to Thunderbird. I'm getting lots of duplicates in RSS feeds.
One of the millions of "Firefox mak...Downloading email crashes Mozilla 1.7.2 [Was: spam email crashing Mozilla 1.7.2]
I posted recently that flaky spam was causing Mozilla 1.7.2 to crash.
I have since discovered that is incorrect - any email message downloaded
from the mail server causes Mozilla 1.7.2 to crash.
Also, Trying to mark any downloaded email as Junk crashes Mozilla.
I suspect that something has gone a little wrong somewhere within my
Mozilla configuration for this profile - my other profile works fine -
but have no idea what to look for or where.
Does anyone have any idea based on the limited info above?
Peter Brown wrote:
> Hi All
> ...Migration failure from 1.1 to 2.0 for showing pdf in web browser
I am trying to migrate my code from 1.1 to 2.0 I got everything working except the following scenario:
The code below works fine for .net 1.1 without any problem.
Response.ContentType = "application/pdf";
Response.End();But on .net 2.0 and Vista this code executes but the browser does not display pdf. The page that contains this code is opened using window.open().
I was able to get the above code working for my test application but not on my REAL applicatio...Dropping 1.9.2, Going 1.9.3 for SeaMonkey 2.1
here in the groups/lists]
I blogged on SeaMonkey 2.1 planning earlier in
http://home.kairo.at/blog/2010-01/seamonkey_2_1_planning and also about
the fact that we have been unsure if we should go 1.9.2 or 1.9.3 in
terms of the platform there.
I sent mails to the SeaMonkey Council and a few quite active developers
in the last days, and asked for opinions on dropping support for 1.9.2
and going for firmly basing SeaMonkey 2.1 on Mozilla platform 1.9.3 instead.
Nobody was really against th...Unable to load these two/2 keckmedicine.org web sites in SeaMonkey web browsers?
Is anyone else having problems connecting to both
http://myuscchart.keckmedicine.org/ and http://keckmedicine.org/ web
sites under 2/two different SeaMonkey web browsers on two/2 different
machines (v2.26.1 in 64-bit W7 EE SP1 and v2.30 in Mac OS X 10.9.5)?
Redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load the requested
page. This may be caused by cookies that are blocked.
The browser has stopped trying to retrieve the requested item. The site
is redirecting the request in a way that will never complete.
Have you disabl...Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:22.214.171.124) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/126.96.36.199
Name: R. Bijster
Summary: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:188.8.131.52) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/184.108.40.206
I want to report that Windowsbrowser V 6.0.2900_SP2, 12 seconds faster
started then FireFoxbrowser.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:220.127.116.11) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/18.104.22.168
...superreview granted: [Bug 285656] bump browser version to 1.0.2 : [Attachment 177062] bump browser version to 1.0.2
Brian Ryner (IBM) <firstname.lastname@example.org> has granted Chase Phillips
<email@example.com>'s request for superreview:
Bug 285656: bump browser version to 1.0.2
Attachment 177062: bump browser version to 1.0.2
...superreview requested: [Bug 285656] bump browser version to 1.0.2 : [Attachment 177062] bump browser version to 1.0.2
Chase Phillips <firstname.lastname@example.org> has asked Brian Ryner (IBM)
<email@example.com> for superreview:
Bug 285656: bump browser version to 1.0.2
Attachment 177062: bump browser version to 1.0.2