Duplicate Security Roles Showing up In Security Roles Manager
Anyone have any ideas? We have had and instance of 3.0.13 with one child portal running for about a month now. A few days ago our adminstrator noticed that we have duplicate entries for security roles. For example, the Security Roles Manager shows:Name Description Fee Every Period Trial Every Period Public Auto Administrators Portal Administration False False Administrators Portal Administration False False Registered Users Registered Users &n...RSA Secure ID enabled website along with role based access to the RSA Secure ID Users
I am trying to implement RSA Security to my intranet website. I want to access the 'RSA Secure ID User Name' and 'Password(Passcode here if possible)' in my application to set the roles of the user
in the website. I want the RSA Secure ID user as my website user if it is registered into my database only. It means 'RSA access' and 'allocating the page access rights' to the user is totally depends upon the 'secure Id user' . I have to retrieve this information from RSA server and use it into my applic...Configuring Roles and Security within VS.NET to use SQL2000/Access
Is there anyway to get the roles and security controls to use an EXISTING database which is either SQL2000 or an Access 2000 database?
TIA and regards
Here's a post explaining how to hook up the ASP.Net v2 security to SQL Server 2000 or 2005. ...Security Roles and User management
I have a question concerning Sercurity roles in 2.0 beta 3.
I noticed that I am unable to delete the registered security role from user profiles where as I was able to do this in 1.x will this be the same in the final release?
I ask because I would really like to set up 3 security roles just like I currently have in 1.x:
Public - no rights other then read ony
Registered - allowed to make content changes but not move modules or add users and such
Admin - full control
Will this be possibe in 2.0? This is kind of a criticle issue for us as we are going to be using DotNetNuke f...when is secure, secure?
I wrote a custom authentication handler for PureFTPD, using a combination of
authentication methods, for about 4 different types of users.
So far, from testing it, it does look to work properly, and does it's job
pretty well (and fast). I use #!/usr/bin/perl -W as well as use Strict, and
use warnings, and the code returns no errors or warnings when run.
I am right to presume that this basically only really tells me the my syntax
and structure of the application is right? What's a good way to see whether
it is actually SECURE... There is a couple of lines of...security too secure
Summary: security too secure
The security thing won't let me in this sight no matter how I accept,
confirm, get certificate, etc.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-GB; rv:1.9.1b4) Gecko/20090423 Firefox/3.5b4
From URL: http://hendrix.mozilla.org/
Note to readers: Hendrix gives no expectation of a response to this feedback
but if you wish to provide one you must BCC (not CC) the sender for them to
...How secure is secure?
Thanks to this group and all the high tech individuals who frequent it I
have learned how to protect my PC from the inside out. But what about
security risks to my info 'before' it gets to my computer? Like my mail
box on the server. Could someone hack into that and thumb through my
If so, how would I ever know?
(The short story)
We have a rogue employee at my work who one day decided to run the web
site, she got in tight with the ISP, got tools to set and delete
passwords on a protected directory on the server. Who knows if she has
telnet access to other things, li...Review: User management with PortSight Secure Access
Anand Narayanaswamy, Microsoft MVP, reviews PortSight Secure Access at ASPAlliance.com.
Go to http://www.aspalliance.com/articleViewer.aspx?aId=269 for full article.
(PortSight Secure Access is a .NET component for user management and access control for ASP.NET applications)....Creating User Account Without Default Security Role (Registered User Role)
My DNN version is 3.1.1. The portal is set to Private Registration. Unauthenicated users have access to the basic pages of the site. We require my company's current customers to register and be approved to have access to all other pages that contain information restricted to them (the major part of the site). As you know, authorizing a user account applys the Registered User security role by default and this is how I control access to the customer areas. We want to create a page that will be used by Marketing to allow potential customers by login to...Manage Users For This Role / Manage Roles For This User Question
In the roles/user management pages there is a link called Manage Users For This Role and Manage Roles For This User respectively. I want non Admins to be able to see these pages, and currently I have it so that they can see the manage users and manage roles pages. However, when a non admin clicks on Manage Users For This Role or Manage Roles For This User link it does not display the control, just an empty page. I can get around this by giving edit rights to the page, but I do not want them to have edit rights for the page. Any ideas?
...Authorization Manager (AzMan) -v- .NET role based security
Comparing Windows Authorization Manager (AzMan) with .NET role based security, consider an application with these requirements:
The roles which will exist at run time are completely user-definable.
Role/operation assignments are completely user-definable.
Need hierarchical role support (create roles from other roles).
Users may be assigned different roles for different things.
Windows Authorization Manager seems to provide all the above, with user definable roles, operations, role/task/operation assignments, hierarchical roles, "scopes" to give users different roles for differe...Security
I have set up the membership and roles provider with Active directory and SQL server respectively, and everything was fine. However I am having this problem in the ASP.NET web Adminstration Tool when I go to Manage Users, and try to edit and save a users Email/Description, it returns an error saying:
Please correct the errors below.
Type 'System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier' in assembly 'mscorlib, Version=188.8.131.52, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089' is not marked as serializable.
Yet, I do not have any problem with updating the roles database. A search on ...changed SQL Security Db and now can't access the Security tab to add new users.
I have changed my SQL provider for my web site from the default ASPNet.mdf file to a SQL 2005 db.
1/ I used the ASP.Net SQL Server Registration Tool to create the correct schema on the new empty db, but I only used Windows authentication. I am wondering if this is causing the problems.
2/ I added entries in my web.config file specifying the new connection string and the new membership, role, and profile providers.
3/ I then modified the connection string in the DB Explorer of VWD to connect to the new SQL 2005 db, again using Windows Authentication. I test...Subject: Welcome "Securely manage the access needs of your ever-changing user community"?
1) When our users have logged onto UserApp (this is a straight UserApp not
provisioning), the top of their Page shows
Novell Identity Manager
Securely manage the access needs of your ever-changing user community
Followed by a teal coloured block of bullet points about "Manage the full
user lifecycle" : etc etc
2) I have found how to modify the contents of the teal coloured block, but
I have not been able to determine how to edit the text that reads "Novell
Identity Manager" or the text that reads "Securely manage the access nee...Why is it an error to have both X-Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only ?
If both a X-Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header and a
X-Content-Security-Policy header are present in the same response, a warning
is posted to the user agent's error console and any policy specified in
X-Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only is ignored. The policy specified in
X-Content-Security-Policy headers is enforced.
Why is this? This seems like an unnecessary burden which prevents groups
from tightening their security policies over time.
For example, here at Google, I'm interested in helping resol...