Differences between .net 1, .net 1.1, .net 2.0 and .net 3.0 #2
Hi, This seems to be a common question, but i havent got an answer yet:(Can, any one please explain me the differences between these versions.If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have trouble putting on your pants!
There are too many differences for one email - - from 1.0 to 1.1 (not a whole lot of real change, other than fixes, at least compared to 1.1 to 2.0)
With 2.0, there were many new declarative controls, with many new ideas added in
With 3.0, it's a superset of 2.0 - instead of replacing the installation completely, it just 'added on' new functionality - I would...
Differences between .net 1, .net 1.1, .net 2.0 and .net 3.0
Hi, This seems to be a common question, but i havent got an answer yet:(Can, any one please explain me the differences between these versions.If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have trouble putting on your pants!
Have a look into this links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework
http://blogs.msdn.com/mohammadakif/archive/2006/12/03/net-3-0-different-versions-of-the-net-framework.aspx
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ComparisonASP1xASP20.aspAshok Rajawww.iGold.inDon't forget to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helped you. This credits that m...
Upgrade/migration issues from VS2003+.NET 1.1 to VS2005+.NET 2.0
Hi,
Visual Studio is great when everything works well and you don't know what is happening under the hood. However when things don't work it is really frustrating since you just don't know what is going on.
I have a project (a web site) that was originally developed for VS2003 and ASP.NET 1.1. When I loaded this project on VS2005 (and ASP.NET 2.0), VS told me that it will migrate it to the new environment: it did a number of things, generated a migration report and created/moved files under App_code and such directories. I tried this process a number of times b...
enigmail-1.0.1 for TB-3.0.x and enigmail-1.1.2 for TB-3.1.x availableHi,
enigmail-1.0.1 (TB-3.0.x) and enigmail-1.1.2 (TB-3.1.x) are available
at http://enigmail.mozdev.org. Note for Seamonkey-2.0.x you can
download and install enigmail-1.0.1.
Have fun, Walter
...
From 2.1.2 to 3.1 or 2.1.2 to 3.0.13 to 3.1
I'm checking back in after being away for a couple of months and I missed the 3.1 release. I can't seem to find any info on what's new in 3.1 and also what the upgrade path should be. So, is the recommended path for upgrading from v 2.1.2 to go directly to 3.1 or do I need to go to 3.0.13 first? Are there any big issues in 3.1 that make it a "gotta have it" version?I did a couple of 2.1.2 to 3.0.12 upgrades but haven't upgraded to or tested 3.1 yet. I have one 2.1.2 site that is commercial and I need it to be down as little time as possible. It also has a lot of third party modules...
Converting 1.1 Web Project to a 2.0 Web Application Project, then and now...
Hey all,
I hope I can explain this correctly, as I am completely lost as to what was and is going on.
About 6-8 months ago, I installed VS2005 Professional on my notebook and got the VS2005 WAP conversion installation, which was a seperate add on at the time. I took a couple small 1.1 applications and as I recall pointed to the .vbproj file and allowed the conversion wizard to do it's thing and then went through the output fixing all the code which was no longer 2.o compliant (ie. Like the SMTP class changes).
Now, on my Desktop I was told to install VS2005 Team System and patc...
after migrating 1.1 to 2.0, project still compiles to 1 single dll, how to convert to "website project"?
Hi, just converted a 1.1 project to 2.0 with VS 2005 SP1. I wanted to convert it to the "website" model so that pages would compile to different dlls versus 1 single dll.
However it converted to 1 single dll. How do i covert it to where it compiles every page separately?
Any tips would be appreciated
Thanks
Hi,
Here are 2 articles which provide detailed steps for migrating ASP.NET 1.1 to 2.0 including using the "website" model.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa479567.aspxhttp://www.pointercorp.com/Convert_ASPDOTNET_11_20.htm
Hope that h...
updated 1.2.2 to 2.0.1 but still shows 1.2.2I just reinstalled the SBS 6 with the NW6 SP3 Overly cd and i put web
access, iprint, dhcp/dns, naas on the initial install. I then proceded to
upgrade edir to 8.7.1 ( i updated jvm and the other stuff that 8.7.1
required first) and everything went great. I then udated imanager from
1.2.2. to 2.0.1 and the install went as expected no errors or anything.
Here is the problem when i surf to iManager with internet exploder 6 it
shows me i am using 1.2.2. I read the instructions and they talk about some
migrating but the direction don't match imanager 1.2.2 (i assume they are
reffe...
Enigmail-1.0.1 for OS/2 TB-3.0.x and SM-2.0.x available at enigmail.mozdev.orgI'm glad to announce that after a while, where some smaller quirks had
to be ironed out, enigmail-1.0.1 can be downloaded from
enigmail.mozdev.org. Thanks to the developers for the upload to their
site. Enigmail-1.0.1 works only with Thunderbird-3.0.x and
Seamonkey-2.0.x. If you still use TB-2.0.0.x or SM-1.1.x you should
stick to enigmail-0.95.7.
In case of trouble please post to this list here.
Have Fun, Walter
...
Problem with Project Migrating from .net 1.1 to .net 2.0
Hi
i am working in .net 1.1 and i am working on a web service. it 's working fine in .net 1.1 with vs2003 but when i migrated my WS from .net 1.1 to .net 2.0 i am getting System.FormatException while converting datetime from string using DateTime.Parse method. it was not happening earlier when i was using .net 1.1. My WS converted from vs2003 to vs2005 using a wizard and it doesn's shows a single error.
i did lots of googling on this issue but didnot gets any help ,
so any reply in the matter will be highly appericiable.
thanks
vishal sharma
vishalsharma808...
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2Name: R. Bijster
Product: Firefox
Summary: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
Comments:
I want to report that Windowsbrowser V 6.0.2900_SP2, 12 seconds faster
started then FireFoxbrowser.
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070219 Firefox/2.0.0.2
...
Updates after 1.5.0.7 (1.5.0.9, 2.0.0.1)can't access the web.Name: Jay
Product: Firefox
Summary: Updates after 1.5.0.7 (1.5.0.9, 2.0.0.1)can't access the web.
Comments:
see summary
Browser Details: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7
...
Making a .NET 1.1 Web Project .NET 2.0 enabled
We were able to use such things as below in the InstantASP forum source code. I'm trying to do the same with Presstopia but it errors out when putting the below in their web.config. <machineKey validationKey="..." decryptionKey="..." validation="SHA1" decryption="3DES" />So what did InstantASP have to do to make their 1.1 code able to use machinekey then if it's not a .NET 2.0 application? I want to do the same for Presstopia. I figure there are general things you can do to allow a 1.1 app to make it able to ...
Mozilla 1.7/1.8a2, Thunderbird 0.6/0.7, Firefox 0.9 and Impos/2 2.1All recent builds (Mozilla 1.7/1.8a2, Thunderbird 0.6/0.7, Firefox 0.9)
crash Impos/2 2.1 as soon they are started, or the other way round
(Impos/2 started afterwards)
06-22-2004 22:38:55 SYS3175 PID 002d TID 0001 Slot 006e
D:\IMPOS21\IMPOS.EXE
c0000005
00069d94
P1=00000001 P2=0000000d P3=XXXXXXXX P4=XXXXXXXX
EAX=00000001 EBX=1c865dec ECX=1c86866c EDX=00000004
ESI=1c865dec EDI=1c87ef80
DS=0053 DSACC=d0f3 DSLIM=7fffffff
ES=0053 ESACC=d0f3 ESLIM=7fffffff
FS=150b FSACC=00f3 FSLIM=00000030
GS=2b43 GSACC=10f3 GSLIM=00003fff
CS:EIP=005b:00069d94 CSACC=d0df CSL...
Any advantages of migrating to .NET 2.0 on still using .NET 1.1 projects?
Sorry for the noob Q - but will I get any advantages in installing .NET 2.0 Framework alongside .NET 1.1 if I dont plan to upgrade my ASP .NET 1.1 web applications?I have a few servers that I will be installing the .NET 2.0 Framework so as to develop in VS2005, however on some servers that will not (at this stage) be used for .NET 2.0 apps and that I may not have the time to convert some VS2003 applications to VS2005, I was in the 'if it aint broke, dont fix it' kind of thinking and didn't know if installing .NET 2.0 would bring any advantages.TIA.
I happen to agree. If you don't nee...