Installed VS.NET 2002. That installed 1.0, but I HAD 1.1 installed. How to remove 1.0?

I haven't seen this anywhere, so I figured I would add it here.  First of all, it is incorrect to recommend to anyone that who has VS.NET 2002 to do ANYTHING but first install VS.NET 2002.  The installl order for VS.NET 2002 and .Net Framwork 1.1 SHOULD BE:

0. Install ALL windows updates for your pc EXCEPT FOR .NET Framwork 1.1
1. Install VS.NET 2002
2. Install MSDE that comes w/VS.NET 2002 (USE A NAMED INSTANCE! Never usee the default instance)
2. Install MDAC 2.8
3. Install .Net Framework 1.1
4. SOMEHOW GET RID OF .NET Framework and get VS.NET and IIS 5.x to work with .Net Framework 1.1
5. Install MSDeskSP3.Net
6. Install MSSQL Client Tools if you have MSSQL. Don't even bother trying to install the instance.
This SHOULD be the order, and NOT anything else. I want to make sure I give the benefit of this to anyone else who has VS.NET 2002 and is trying to install everything on a new XP Pro PC. Unfortunately it's not the way it was recommended to me, and more important is my question now.
MY QUESTION IS HOW DO I get VS.NET and IIS 5.x to work with .NET Framework 1.1 so I can get rid of .NET Framework 1.0? I don't want both on my PC. And I don't want to work w/an old version of 1.1 as most of you would agree. Can anyone help me that KNOWS the answer? Anyone from microsoft? It's frustrating when you've spent 1000's of dollars on microsoft software yet can't get ANY support.
Thanks in advance for any knowledgable help.
0
andyhock
6/2/2004 11:51:50 AM
asp.net.installation-setup 5668 articles. 1 followers. Follow

3 Replies
1611 Views

Similar Articles

[PageSpeed] 22

I should really have title this thread 'the proper way to install vs.net 2002 instead of what it is.  If a mod could change it, I'd appreciate it.  No one who has VS.NET 2002 will find this with this subject, and there's a thread I found that discusses at least switching from 1.0 to 1.1, though the tool discussed doesn't address all the issues unfortunately.
0
andyhock
6/2/2004 2:50:27 PM
The point is fairly easy: VS.NET 2002 was written when ASP.NET v1.0 was developed and thus needs v1.0 to work with. VS.NET 2003 uses the framework v1.1 and thus uses ASP.NET v1.1. To get a clean start, use VS.NET 2003 instead (which is a rather cheap upgrade when coming from VS.NET 2002!).
Bart De Smet [MVP]



Visit www.msdn.be, www.bartdesmet.net
0
bdesmet
6/4/2004 11:32:07 PM
please , any one  can tell me how can i setup the new Etheryatri toolkit ?

i have some problems in setup ,please tell me exactlly....
tnank you
0
Ebrahim
6/5/2004 8:44:06 PM
Reply:

Similar Artilces:

superreview granted: [Bug 283181] installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175188] Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6
Ben Goodger <bugs@bengoodger.com> has granted Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 283181: installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283181 Attachment 175188: Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175188&action=edit ...

superreview requested: [Bug 283181] installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175188] Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6
Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org> has asked Ben Goodger <bugs@bengoodger.com> for superreview: Bug 283181: installer version text needs to be upgraded from 1.0 to 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283181 Attachment 175188: Bump version in installers to 1.0.1/1.7.6 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175188&action=edit ...

installing .net 1.1 framework after .net 2.0 framework has already been installed
I am configuring my server 2003 (standard edition) to host a service application that will be accessed with mobile devices. The requirement for the mobile licenses to work properly is that I install the 1.1 framework. I downloaded the redistributable file and went to install it and was prompted, "The product you are trying to install has already been installed with your operating system. Use Windows update to install the latest updates." Through the "add/remove programs" window there is no indication the .net 1.1 framework is installed. When I navigate to C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft .NET...

Do I need VS 1.0 to install VS 2003 (.NET 1.1)?
I got a new computer where I will need to install my copies of VS 2003 and VS 2005.  All copies are legal with original disks.   I purchased VS 2003 as an upgrade to VS.NET that came before VS 2003.  Do I need to install that very first version 1.0 of VS in order to install VS 2003? Thank you in advance.   If it's an upgrade version, then you will need the previous version installed.Darrell Norton, MVPDarrell Norton's BlogPlease mark this post as answered if it helped you! Thank you for your reply.  However, I was hoping that VS 2003 coul...

superreview granted: [Bug 283224] mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175211] Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1
Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org> has granted Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org>'s request for superreview: Bug 283224: mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283224 Attachment 175211: Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175211&action=edit ------- Additional Comments from Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org> thanks chase ...

superreview requested: [Bug 283224] mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 : [Attachment 175211] Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1
Chase Phillips <cmp@mozilla.org> has asked Scott MacGregor <mscott@mozilla.org> for superreview: Bug 283224: mail installer version text needs to be bumped from 1.0 to 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283224 Attachment 175211: Bump Tb Windows installer to version 1.0.1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=175211&action=edit ...

Install 1.0 and 1.1 side-by-side and use the 1.1 csc to compile a 1.0
Hi, I have the following (tricky) questions: 1. Can I install the 1.0 and 1.1 .NET Framework side-by-side with NO drawbacks on MY PC where I develop the .NET applications? (I do NOT use VS.NET) 2. After installing the 1.1 version, am I STILL ABLE to compile a 1.0 version, since our production web-server still runs on 1.0 (our development web-server was upgraded to 1.1) ?? thx Eau .... as long as you compile DLLs with the right csc.exe/vbc.exe from 1.0 or 1.1 Free ASP.NET Version Switcher may interest you.DNN skins ForumTressleworks modulesDNN & webhostingIEWCtrls...

how to install .ner framework 1.1 after .net framework 2.0 has been installed?
hello everyone!I got a problem, I have installed .net framework 2.0 in my computer, but now I need to install .net framework 1.1.The install process of .net framework 1.1 halt when it is stoping the IIS Admin.Can I install .net framework 1.1 after .net framework 2.0 has been installed?Or I have to remove 2.0 and install 1.1 and 2.0 in sequence?Thank you very much! There is no sequence in .net framework 1.1 and 2.0 installation.You can look into the installation log and check what's the problem.Can you post your installation errors?Maybe I can help you to fix the error through your...

Installation of both .net framework 1.0 & 1.1
I've already installed .net Visual Studio 2002 into my server and by installing this it was also installed 1.0 .net framework SDK into my server I have already download the .net framework 1.1 not the SDK pack and installed it to my server.And my problem is that when I'm trying to open an ASP page to my server which have to do with database let's say MS ACCESS database it bring me this error: The page cannot be displayed There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------...

Installation of both .net framework 1.0 & 1.1
I've already installed .net Visual Studio 2002 into my server and by installing this it was also installed 1.0 .net framework SDK into my server I have already download the .net framework 1.1 not the SDK pack and installed it to my server.And my problem is that when I'm trying to open an ASP page to my server which have to do with database let's say MS ACCESS database it bring me this error: The page cannot be displayed There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it cannot be displayed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------...

Can't install version 2.0 besides 1.1: dotnetfx.exe will only install 1.1
Hi,  I'm trying to install version 2.0 beside version 1.1 on a Win2000 server. First I download the correct version of dotnetfx.exe (for version 2.0), but when I run this, I'm asked if I want to install version 1.1 (which is already present). It does not help to uninstall 1.1 first, I'm still prompted to install 1.1, even if dotnetfx.exe is the one for version 2.0! Could this be due to any settings on the server?     RGDS a newbe...  Check carefully for every copy of DOTNETFX.COM on the machine (check every folder including system ones), and rename them according to the version number. Then try installing again.Don't forget to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helped you.This credits that member, earns you a point and marks your thread as Resolved so we will all know you have been helped. Hi and thanks for the suggestion. I searched the server and did only find those dotnetfx.exe-files I had put there. But then I checked the file properties and my dotnetfx.exe file was really the one for version 1.1........! ("Do you feel stupid?").  I'm pretty shure that the correct verson 2.0 install file was downloaded from Microsoft (if then for some reason they uploaded the older version to me). But somewhere along the line of copying, I must have grabbed an older version present on one of the servers. Anyhow, running the correct dotnetfx.exe did install framework 2.0, indeed...! Once again thanks for ...

.NET SP2 for Framework 1.0 if 1.1 is also installed
if I have installed .NET Frameworks versions both 1.0 and 1.1? Apparently .NEt SP2 is required by .NET Framework 1.0 but not by .NET Framework 1.1 Have anybody experienced problems due to its installation with simultaneously installed .NET Frameworks?Guennadi Vanine - Gennady Vanin - Геннадий Ванин Hi Guenavan I have had both installed on a afew machines at work and both run happily together and I use them both a lot. Cheers GregorGregor SuttieMCSD, MCAD, MCSD.Net...

Help! Installing Seamonkey 1.0.1 messed up system
Something went horribly wrong when I tried to install Seamonkey 1.0.1. First, Seamonkey was missing menu and menu item labels and displayed a partial error message in red at the very bottom of the window (_below_ the row containing the status area, the on-line/off-line indicator, etc.). The message says: <broadcaster id="Communicator:Workmode" --^ The really bad part is that is messed up something on my machine (Windows XP)--when I uninstalled Seamonkey 1.0.1 and tried installing Seamonkey 1.0 and then Mozilla Suite 1.7.12, I get the same symptoms. I also...

VS.net says .net 1.1 not installed
This is really driving me nuts!! I installed VS.net, installed IIS 5, then installed (supposedly) .net framework 1.1 Heres the rub. I try to create a new web app in vs and all I get are messages telling me that the server does not have .net 1.1 installed. I re-installed the .net framework 1.1 and tried again. Still nothing. I am running the server on the same machine that I am working with VS.net for now. I have looked around the Internet and have followed several tutorials and quick fixes that did not work at all. I have tried restarting the server. I have tried renameing w...

Differences between .net 1, .net 1.1, .net 2.0 and .net 3.0
Hi, This seems to be a common question, but i havent got an answer yet:(Can, any one please explain me the differences between these versions.If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have trouble putting on your pants! Have a look into this links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.NET_Framework http://blogs.msdn.com/mohammadakif/archive/2006/12/03/net-3-0-different-versions-of-the-net-framework.aspx http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/ComparisonASP1xASP20.aspAshok Rajawww.iGold.inDon't forget to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helped you. This credits that m...

Unable to debug .net 1.1 applications after installing .net framework 2.0 ?
Help! Oh man, Im confused now... I didn't realize that the .net framework 2.0 wouldn't work through VS 2003... when I installed it, it killed my ability to debug on my local server.  Went to IIS, changed my folder properties to .net 2.0, still didnt' work... (which is when I looked here for info and realized that I can't use the 2.0 framework until I get a copy of VS 2005) So... I uninstalled .net framework 2.0 and went back to IIS and changed the ASPNET folder properties back to framework 1.1 and STILL I can't debug... I tried the "start without debugging" option and my webserver say...

Unable to debug .net 1.1 applications after installing .net framework 2.0 ?
NET Framework 2.0 (CodeName: Whidbey) is the buzz word around and most of us would have installed the BETA versions to try our hands. However, after you install .NET Framework 2.0, if you continue to use Visual Studio.NET 2003 you may be unable to debug the applications developed in .NET 1.1. You may receive the error "Unable to start debugging on the webserver..." This Article explains the scenario and provides the solution for the same. Hope it helps.regards,Harishhttp://geekswithblogs.net/ranganh...

Unable to debug .net 1.1 applications after installing .net framework 2.0 ?
..NET Framework 2.0 (CodeName: Whidbey) is the buzz word around and most of us would have installed the BETA versions to try our hands. However, after you install .NET Framework 2.0, if you continue to use Visual Studio.NET 2003 you may be unable to debug the applications developed in .NET 1.1. You may receive the error "Unable to start debugging on the webserver..." This Article provides the solution for the same. Thanks.regards,Harishhttp://geekswithblogs.net/ranganh...

Just Installed 1.0.4 over 1.0.1
I installed SeaMonkey 1.0.4 last night and allowed it to install over the previous version (1.0.1). Everything seemed to work fine - all my bookmarklets, extensions, and plugins are working. I've used it this morning - no obvious problems..... But I tried to download an image from http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ this morning, and the image does not appear in the directory it says it downloaded to. No file name listed as per the DM function. The DM window appears, I select where the image is to go and click. All seemingly normal. But the image is not saved - not wh...

Unable to debug .net 1.1 applications after installing .net framework 2.0 ? #2
Hi, After you install .NET Framework 2.0, if you continue to use Visual Studio.NET 2003 you may be unable to debug the applications developed in .NET 1.1. You may receive the error "Unable to start debugging on the webserver..." Please check My Article on this issue and the resolution for the same. Comments are welcome. Thanks. regards,Harishhttp://geekswithblogs.net/ranganh...

Differences between .net 1, .net 1.1, .net 2.0 and .net 3.0 #2
Hi, This seems to be a common question, but i havent got an answer yet:(Can, any one please explain me the differences between these versions.If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have trouble putting on your pants! There are too many differences for one email - - from 1.0 to 1.1 (not a whole lot of real change, other than fixes, at least compared to 1.1 to 2.0) With 2.0, there were many new declarative controls, with many new ideas added in With 3.0, it's a superset of 2.0 - instead of replacing the installation completely, it just 'added on' new functionality - I would...

Installing C++2006 wants to install .NET v 1.1
I want to install C++2006 on a laptop that already has .NET v2.0 installed. But the installer won't let me proceed without installing v1.1. Obviously I don't want to install an older version. How do I go forward here? Gord Pollock wrote: > I want to install C++2006 on a laptop that already has .NET v2.0 installed. > But the installer won't let me proceed without installing v1.1. > > Obviously I don't want to install an older version. How do I go forward > here? You must install .net 1.1 . Without it BDS will not install. But you have miscon...

Install Framework 1.1 after Framework 2.0 already installed?
Is there any conflicts installing framework 1.1 on a server after framework 2.0 is already installed?  I have an application that can only run on version 1.1 and I only have 2.0 installed.  Do I have to rollback 2.0 and install 1.1 first or should it be ok? They are individual, can run side by side and can be installed in any order.  Make sure you set the app to run in the correct framework. JeffPlease: Don't forget to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helped you. That way future readers will know which post solved your issue. I've installed in this ...

question on installing VS.NET and .NET Framework 1.1
Question 1: on the download page for v1.1 of the .NET framework, there are two separte download listed, one under Step2 (.NET Framework Redist 1.1) and one under Step4 (.NET Framework SDK 1.1). 1) i downloaded the first((.NET Framework Redist 1.1) and have NO IDEA where it installed the files. can you tell me where these files are installed. 2) when i go to install the second, it prompts me for a directory. do i need to specify where the files for the first were installed? if so where is that? I do not want to have duplicates all over the place Question 2: The installation ...

Web resources about - Installed VS.NET 2002. That installed 1.0, but I HAD 1.1 installed. How to remove 1.0? - asp.net.installation-setup

Pre-installed software - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bundled software is another name for pre-installed software, as pre-installed are all bundled with a hardware device of some kind. However, bundled ...

REPORT: Facebook Home Can Be Installed On All Android Devices Running 4.0 And Up
The good news: Facebook Home can now be run on all Android devices running version 4.0 of the mobile operating system or higher, even if they ...

HTC reveals HTC First, an Android smartphone pre-installed with Facebook Home
HTC today revealed the HTC First, the first Android smartphone that comes with Facebook Home pre-installed on the device. With Facebook Home ...

Introducing installed app category targeting: a new way to target users and gain insights into mobile ...
We’re excited to introduce installed app category targeting: a new tool that enables app advertisers to reach users based on the categories of ...

CPU fan installed - Flickr - Photo Sharing!
Explore Garrette's photos on Flickr. Garrette has uploaded 3652 photos to Flickr.

Gay-friendly traffic lights installed in Vienna - YouTube
Keep up-to-date with the latest news, subscribe here: http://bit.ly/AFP-subscribe Several pedestrian crossings in Vienna are showing symbols ...

Chris Gayle posts photos of strip club installed in his own house
... his party lifestyle off the cricket field, but the West Indian has gone to a whole new level by showing off the new "strip club" he has installed ...

Cameras installed on hull of ISS (00:59)
RAW VIDEO: Russian cosmonauts perform a spacewalk to install photographic and scientific equipment on the hull of the International Space Station. ...

Where in the US is solar installed?
New data shows that Californians' penchant for photovoltaics has them leading in pipeline capacity by a factor of five, while Nevada's love of ...

Giant Gollum installed at airport ahead of Hobbit film
A 12 metre-long sculpture carved using robotics and chainsaws has been installed at Wellington Airport ahead of The Hobbit premiere.

Resources last updated: 3/9/2016 5:24:06 AM